Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1898 Cases
173 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Grant v. Buckner
GRANT v. BUCKNER. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA. No. 89. Submitted November 29,1898. Decided December 19, 1898. Certain real estate in Louisiana, consisting of five plantations standing in the name of J. Morgan, was c
Norwood v. Baker
NORWOOD v. BAKER. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. No. 34. Submitted May 3,1898. Decided December 12,1898. The principle underlying special assessments upon private property to meet the c
Blake v. McClung
BLAKE v. McCLUNG. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OF TENNESSEE. No. 6. Submitted November 8,1897. Decided December 12,1898. Chapter 31 of the acts of Tennessee of 1877, entitled “ An act to declare the terms on which foreign corpora
United States v. Loughrey
UNITED STATES v. LOUGHREY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 22. Argued and submitted April 21,1898. Decided December 12, 1898. Under the act of June 3, 1856, c. H, 11 Stat. 21, the State of Michigan tools t
New Mexico v. United States Trust Co.
NEW MEXICO v. UNITED STATES TRUST COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF NEW MEXICO. No. 106. Argued October 25, 26, 1898. Decided December 5,1898. The provision in Sec. 2 of the act of July 27, 1866, c. 278, 14 Stat. 29
Harkrader v. Wadley
HARKRADER v. WADLEY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. No. 41. Argued October 17, 1898. Decided December 5, 1898. The facts in the record show that there is no merit in the several obje
United States v. Ranlett & Stone
UNITED STATES v. RANLETT AND STONE. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 20. Submitted October 11,1898. Decided December 5, 1898. Section 7 of the act of February 8, 1875, c. 36, 18 Stat. 307, 30S, was repea
McCullough v. Virginia
McCullough v. Virginia. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF VIRGINIA. No. 3. Argued February 21, 23,1898. Decided December 5,1898. On the 29th of May, 1892, the plaintiff below (plaintiff in error here) filed a bill in the
Meyer v. Richmond
MEYER v. RICHMOND. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OR THE STATE OR VIRGINIA. No. 48. Submitted October 14,1898. Decided November 28, 1898. The plaintiffs declaration, in a case pending in a nisi prim court in Virginia, set forth that
Green Bay & Mississippi Canal Co. v. Patten Paper Co.
GREEN BAY & MISSISSIPPI CANAL COMPANY v. PATTEN PAPER COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OE WISCONSIN. No. 14. Argued January 13, 14, 1898. Decided November 28,1898. No particular form of words or phrases in which a claim of F
United States v. Wardwell
UNITED STATES v. WARDWELL. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 53. Argued. October 20, 1898. Decided November 28, 1898. Three cheques were drawn in June, 1869, by authorized army officers upon the Assistant Treasurer of the "United States
Pittsburgh &c. Railway v. Board of Public Works
PITTSBURGH &c. RAILWAY v. BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS OF WEST VIRGINIA. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA. No. 8. Submitted January 25, 1898. Decided November 28,1898. The collection of taxes ass
Andersen v. Treat
ANDERSEN v. TREAT. APPEAL FBOM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. No. 415. Argued November 8,1898. Decided November 14,1898. The principle that a writ of habeas corpus cannot be made use of as a wr
Walla Walla City v. Walla Walla Water Co.
WALLA WALLA CITY v. WALLA WALLA WATER COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON. No. 28. Argued October 12,13,1898. Decided November 14,1898. By an act of November 28, 1883, the legislature o
New York State v. Roberts
NEW YORK STATE v. ROBERTS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. No. 21. Argued April 20, 21, 1898. Decided October 31, 1898. The statutes of the State of New York, providing that “Every corporation, joint stock company or as
Pierce v. Somerset Railway
PIERCE v. SOMERSET RAILWAY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF THE STATE OF MAINE. No. 12. Argued October 11, 12, 1898. Decided October 31, 1898. Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361, affirmed and followed to the points: (1) That to give thi
Naeglin v. De Cordoba
NAEGLIN v. De CORDOBA. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF NEW MEXICO. No. 35. Argued October 13, 1898. Decided October 24, 1898. All order signed in vacation by the several member’s of the Supreme Court of the Territory of Ne
Brown v. United States
BROWN v. UNITED STATES. CURLEY v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE UNITED STATES COURT IN THE INDIAN TERRITORY. Nos. 249, 250. Submitted April 25, 1898. Decided October 24, 1898. This court has no appellate jurisdiction of capital cases from the
Northwestern Bank v. Freeman
NORTHWESTERN BANK v. FREEMAN. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF ARIZONA. No. 18. Argued April 15, 18, 1898. Decided October 24, 1898. A description in a chattel mortgage of a given number of articles or animals out of a larg
Anderson v. United States
ANDERSON v. UNITED STATES. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 181. Argued February 25, 28, 1898. Decided October 24, 1898. The Traders’ Live Stock Exchange' was an unincorporated association in Kansas Cit
Hopkins v. United States
HOPKINS v. UNITED STATES. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 210. Argued February 28, March 1, 1898. Decided October 24, 1898. The Kansas City Live Stock Exchange was an unincorporated volunteer associati
United States v. Joint Traffic Ass'n
UNITED STATES v. JOINT TRAFFIC ASSOCIATION. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 84. Argued February 24, 25, 1898. Decided October 24, 1898. Thirty-one railroad companies, engaged in transportation between Ch
Hubbard v. Tod
HUBBARD, Assignee, v. TOD. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 24. Argued April 22, 25, 1898. Decided October 17, 1898. On the hearing of a case, brought by certiorari from a Circuit Court of Appeals on pe
Briggs v. Walker
BRIGGS v. WALKER. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF 'THE STATE OF KENTUCKY. No. 260. Submitted April 25, 1898. Decided October 17, 1898. Under an act of Congress, entitled “an act for the relief of the estate ” of a certain person deceased,
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.