Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1898 Cases
173 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
United States v. Maish
UNITED STATES v. MAISH. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF' PRIVATE LAND CLAIMS. No. 297. Argued March 15, 16, 1898. Decided May 31, 1898. Ely's Administrator v. United States, ante, 220, affirmed and followed. The case is stated in the opinion. Mr.
Ely's Administrator v. United States
ELY’S ADMINISTRATOR v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF PRIVATE LAND CLAIMS. No. 27. Argued March 15, 16, 1898. Decided May 31, 1898. The grant which is the subject of controversy in this case was one which, at the time of the cessio
Tide Water Oil Co. v. United States
TIDE WATER OIL COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 149. Argued April 29, 1898. Decided May 31, 1898. The court 'of claims made the following findings of fact in this case. I. During the years 1889, 1890 and 1891 t
Hubbell v. United States
HUBBELL v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 198. Argued April 13, 14, 1898. Decided May 31, 1898. On the findings and the facts detailed in the statement and in the opinion of this court, it is held that a former judgment
The Irrawaddy
THE IRRAWADDY. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 591. Submitted April 11, 1898. Decided May 31, 1898. If a vessel, seaworthy at the beginning of the voyage, is afterwards stranded by the negligence of
Young v. Amy
YOUNG v. AMY. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF UTAH. No. 242. Submitted April 27, 1898. Decided May 31, 1898. On error or appeal to the Supreme Court of a Territory, this court is without power to reexamine the facts, and i
District of Columbia v. Bailey
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. BAILEY. BAILEY v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Nos. 390, 420. Submitted January 10, 1898, Decided May 31, 1898. The commissioners of the District of Columbia have n
Pullman's Palace Car Co. v. Central Transportation Co.
PULLMAN’S PALACE CAR COMPANY v. CENTRAL TRANSPORTATION COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FROM THE EASTERN DISTRICT OP PENNSYLYANIA; AND ALSO CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 141
North American Commercial Co. v. United States
NORTH AMERICAN COMMERCIAL COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. CERTIORARI. TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 431. Argued April 18, 19, 1898. Decided May 31, 1898. By the agreement of March 12, 1890, between the United States
Central National Bank v. Stevens
CENTRAL NATIONAL BANK v. STEVENS. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. Motion to amend mandate. Submitted May 9, 1898. Decided May 31, 1898. The motion to amend the mandate is denied. This was a motion to-amend the mandat
Tinsley v. Anderson
TINSLEY v. ANDERSON. SAME v. SAME. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. ERROR TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS. Nos. 632, 633. Argued May 5, 6, 1898. Decided May 31, 1
Johnson v. Drew
JOHNSON v. DREW. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. No. 239. Submitted April 28, 1898. Decided May 31, 1898. The substantial rights of the defendant -were not prejudiced by the ruling of the trial court sustaining the demur
Schollenberger v. Pennsylvania
SCHOLLENBERGER v. PENNSYLVANIA. PAUL v. PENNSYLVANIA. PAUL v. PENNSYLVANIA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA. Nos. 86, 87, 88. Argued March 23, 24, 1898. Decided May 28, 1898. Oleomargarine has, for nearly a quarter o
United States v. Lies
UNITED STATES v. LIES. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 235. Argued April 26, 1898. —Decided May 28, 1898. When the Government takes no appeal from the action of the board of appraisers upon an importer
Clark v. Fitzgerald
CLARK v. FITZGERALD. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA. No. 145. Argued December 7, 8, 1897. Decided May 23, 1898. The answer given to the fourth question in Del Monte Mining and Milling Co. v. Last Chance Mining and Millin
Del Monte Mining & Milling Co. v. Last Chance Mining & Milling Co.
DEL MONTE MINING AND MILLING COMPANY v. LAST CHANCE MINING AND MILLING COMPANY. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 147. Argued December 8, 9, 1897. Decided May 23, 1898. To the first question certified
Detroit Citizens' Street Railway Co. v. Detroit Railway
DETROIT CITIZENS’ STREET RAILWAY COMPANY v. DETROIT RAILWAY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN. No. 236. Argued April 26, 27, 1898. Decided May 23, 1898. At the time when the plaintiff in error received from the city of De
Harrison v. Morton
HARRISON v. MORTON. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND. No. 245. Argued May 2, 3, 1898. Decided May 23, 1898. Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361, affirmed to the points : (1) That to give this court jurisdiction of a writ o
Pounds v. United States
POUNDS v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA. No. 298. Submitted May 6, 1898. Decided May 23, 1898. An indictment under Rev. Stat. § 3296, for the concealment of distilled sp
Collins v. New Hampshire
COLLINS v. NEW HAMPSHIRE. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE. No. 17. Argued March 23, 24, 1898. Decided May 23, 1898. Following the decision in Schollenberger v. Pennsylvania, ante, 1, the court holds that the statute
United States v. Coe
UNITED STATES v. COE. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF PRIVATE LAND CLAIMS. No. 8. Argued March 14, 15, 1898. Decided May 23, 1898. After a careful examination of all the acts of the Mexican authorities upon which the appellee claims that liis-titl
Kingman v. Western Manufacturing Co.
KINGMAN v. WESTERN MANUFACTURING COMPANY. " CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 248. Submitted May 4, 1898. Decided May 23, 1898. A judgment is not final, so that the jurisdiction of the Appellate Court ma
Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Archibald
TEXAS AND PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. ARCHIBALD. error to the circuit court of appeals for the fifth CIRCUIT. No. 20T. Submitted April 15, 1898. Decided May 28, 1898. It is the duty of a railroad company to use reasonable care to see that th
The Carib Prince
THE CARIB PRINCE. certiorari to the circuit court of appeals for the second circuit. No. 45. Argued March 7, 8, 1898. Decided May 23, 1898. Under the settled doctrine of this court, that the concurrent-decisions of. two courts upon a questi
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.