Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1898 Cases
173 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
The Silvia
THE SILVIA. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 5. Argued March 8, 1898 Decided October 17, 1898. A ship, whose port holes between decks are fitted with the usual glass covers and the usual iron shutters,
The G. R. Booth
THE G. R. BOOTH. CERTIFICATE FROM: THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 10. Argued December 17, 1897. Decided October 17, 1898. A provision in a bill of lading, that the carrier “ shall not be liable for loss or damage c
California National Bank v. Stateler
CALIFORNIA NATIONAL BANK v. STATELER. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OE CALIFORNIA. No. 37. Submitted May 4, 1898. Decided October 17, 1898. This case is dismissed because the judgment below was not a final judgment; the settled ru
California National Bank v. Thomas
CALIFORNIA NATIONAL BANK v. THOMAS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. No. 36. Submitted May 4, 1898. Decided October 17, 1898. A judgment of tlie highest court of a State reversing the judgment of the state court below,
Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Campbell
Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railway Company v. David Campbell. No. 235. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Kansas. Submitted with No. 236 on the same brief.
Columbus Construction Co. v. Crane Co.
No. 782. Columbus Construction Company, Petitioner, v. Crane Company, Respondent.
Louisville v. Bank of Commerce
No. 363. Louisville v. The Bank of Commerce. Appeal from the .Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Kentucky.
Henderson Bridge Co. v. Henderson City
Henderson Bridge Company v. Henderson City. Error to the Court of Appeals of the State of Kentucky. No. 31. No. 32. Argued and decided with
Henrietta Mining & Milling Co. v. Hill
No. 138. Henrietta Mining and Milling Company v. Hill. Appeal from the Supreme Court of the Territory of Arizona.
Pierce v. Ayer
Pierce v. Ayer, error to the Supreme Judicial Court of the State of Maine. No. 13. Argued with No. 12.
King v. Panther Lumber Co.
KING v. PANTHER LUMBER COMPANY. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA. No. 240. Argued April 28, 1898. Decided May 31, 1898. King v. Mullins, ante, 404, followed. The case is stated in the opin
King v. Mullins
KING v. MULLINS. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOE THE DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA. No. 157. Argued March 22, 23, 1898. Decided May 31, 1898. The systém established by the State of West Virginia, under which lands liable to
Baldy v. Hunter
BALDY v. HUNTER. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF GEORGIA. No. 241. Argued April 29, 1898. Decided May 31, 1898. Transactions between persons actually residing within the territory dominated by the government of the Confederate St
Thompson v. Missouri
THOMPSON v. MISSOURI. error to the .supreme court of THE STATE OF MISSOURI. No. 623. Submitted April 21, 1898. Decided May 31, 1898. The act of the legislature of Missouri of April 8, 1895, Missouri Laws 1895, page 284-, providing that “ co
White v. Butler
WHITE v. BUTLER. WHITE v. RUCKMAN. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA. Nos. 540, 541. Argued March 21, 22, 1898. Decided May 31, 1898. White v. Berry, ante, 366, affirmed and followed. The
White v. Berry
WHITE v. BERRY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA. No. 539. Argued March 21, 22, 1898. Decided May 31, 1898. A court of equity has no jurisdiction over the appointment and removal of public
Smyth v. Ames
SMYTH v. AMES. SMYTH v. SMITH. SMYTH v. HIGGINSON. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. APPLICATION FOR REHEARING AND MODIFICATION OF JUDGMENTS. Nos. 49, 50, 51. Submitted May 9, 1898. Decided Ma
Patapsco Guano Co. v. North Carolina Board of Agriculture
PATAPSCO GUANO COMPANY v. NORTH CAROLINA BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. 9. Argued March 3, 4, 1898. Decided May 31, 1898. The act of the legislature o
New Orleans v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.
NEW ORLEANS v. TEXAS AND PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. No. 1. Argued January 3, 4, 1898. Decided May 31, 1898. Where an undertaking on one side is in terms
Walrath v. Champion Mining Co.
WALRATH v. CHAMPION MINING COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 230. Argued April 22, 1898. Decided May 31, 1898. On tlie 28th of April, 1871, on a previous location made in 1857, the Providence Gold a
Perrin v. United States
PERRIN v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF PRIVATE LAND CLAIMS. No. 30. Argued March 16, 17, 1898. Decided May 31, 1898. Camou v. United States, ante, 277, followed. The case is stated in the opinion. Mr. Byron Waters and Mr. John T.
Camou v. United States
CAMOU v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF PRIVATE LAND CLAIMS. No. 28. Argued March 16, 1898. Decided May 31, 1898. A valid grant was made in this case, which it was not within the power of ■ a temporary dictator to destroy by an arb
Northern Pacific Railroad v. Smith
NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. SMITH. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 93. Argued March 21, 1898. Decided May 31, 1898. Neither the city of Bismarck, as owner of the town site, nor its grantee Smith, c
Faxon v. United States
FAXON v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF PRIVATE LAND CLAIMS. No. 119. Argued March 18, 1898. Decided May 31, 1898. In order to the confirmation of any claim, the Court of Private Land Claims, under the act of March 3, 1891, c. 539,
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.