Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1901 Cases
177 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
District of Columbia v. Camden Iron Works
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. CAMDEN IRON WORKS. EEEOE TO THE COUET OF APPEALS OK THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 172. Submitted March 7, 1901. Decided May 13, 1901. Any seal may be used and adopted by a corporation as well as an individual, and tb
United States Rubber Co. v. American Oak Leather Co.
UNITED STATES RUBBER COMPANY v. AMERICAN OAK LEATHER COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIROUIT COURT OP APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH circuit. ' No. 150. Argued January 25, 28, 1901. Decided May 13, 1901. The right of an insolvent debtor to prefer one c
Put-in-Bay Waterworks v. Ryan
PUT-IN-BAY WATERWORKS &c. COMPANY v. RYAN. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCÜIT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. ’ No. 332. Submitted February 25, 1901. Decided May 13, 1901. The property and franchises, which are the subject matter of this suit
German National Bank v. Speckert
GERMAN NATIONAL BANK v. SPECKERT. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OE APPEALS POR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 192. Argued March 12, 1901. Decided May 13, 1901. No appeal lies to this court,.under the act of March 3, 1891, c. 517, §-6,'from a judgme
Tucker v. U. S. ex rel. Alexandroff
No. 642. Tucker, Vice Consul, v. U. S. ex rel. Alexandroff. Third Circuit. Mr. F. R. Condert, Jr., Mr. Paul Fuller, and Mr. John F. Lewis for petitioner.
Farrell v. West Chicago Park Commissioners
FARRELL v. WEST CHICAGO PARK COMMISSIONERS. BRROR TO THE SUPREME' COURT OE THE STATE OF ILLINOIS. No. 201. Argued March 18, 19, 1901. Decided April 29, 1901. French v. Barber Asphalt Co. ante, 824, and Wight v. Davidson ante, 371, followed.
Wormley v. District of Columbia
WORMLEY v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. ALLEN v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Nos. 101, 102. Submitted November 12, 1900. Decided April 29, 1901. Parsons v. District of Columbia, 170 U. S. 45, an
Detroit v. Parker
DETROIT v. PARKER. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCÜIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. No. 411. Argued February 26, 1901. Decided April 29, 1901. Cass Farm Company v. Detroit, ante, 396, followed in holding that it was
Cass Farm Co. v. Detroit
CASS FARM COMPANY v. DETROIT. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN. No. 508. Argued February 25, 26, 27, 1901. Decided April 29, 1901. 'The court holds and adheres to its decisions in French v. Asphalt Paving Co., Tonawanda v
Webster v. Fargo
WEBSTER v. FARGO. ERROR TO THE SÜPREME OOURT OF THE STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA. No. 378. Argued and submitted February 27, 1901. Decided April 29, 1901. It is within the power of the legislature of a State to create special taxing districts, and
Tonawanda v. Lyon
TONAWANDA v. LYON. APPEAL PROM THE CIROUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 214. Argued February 26, 1901. Decided April 29, 1901. It was not the intention of the court in Norwood v. Baker, 172 U. S. 269
Wight v. Davidson
WIGHT v. DAVIDSON. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 283. Argued October 26, 29, 1900. Decided April 29, 1901. A constitutional right against unjust taxation is given for the protection of private property, b
French v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.
FRENCH v. BARBER ASPHALT PAVING COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OF MISSOURI. No. 498. Argued February 25, 26, 27, 1901. Decided April 29, 1901. In this case tlie court proceeds on the assumption that the legal import of the
American Sugar Refining Co. v. New Orleans
AMERICAN SUGAR REFINING COMPANY v. NEW ORLEANS. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 535. Argued and submitted March 18, 1901. Decided April 29, 1901. The Circuit Courts of Appeals have power to review the j
Speed v. McCarthy
SPEED v. McCARTHY. EKKOS TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE PENNINGTON COUNTY, SOUTH DAKOTA. No. 230. Argued April 10, 11, 1901. Decided April 29, 1901. As against tlie purchaser of interests in mining claims after the location ■ certificates were rec
Treat v. White
TREAT v. WHITE. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND circuit. No. 227. Argued April 10, 1901. Decided April 29, 1901. What is denominated “ a call,” in the language of New York stock brokers, ■ is an agreement to sel
Wall v. Cox
WALL v. COX. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. ' No. 504. Submitted April 15, 1901. Decided April 29, 1901. Under the Bankrupt Act of 1898, the District Court of the United States in -which proceedings in
Allegheny Oil Co. v. Snyder
No. 617. Allegheny Oil Company v. Snyder. Sixth Circuit. Mr. W H. H. Miller and Mr. J. B. Chapman fo? petitioner. Mr. D. A. Hollingsworth and Mr. Edward McSweeney opposing.
Smith v. St. Louis & Southwestern Railway Co.
SMITH v. ST. LOUIS AND SOUTHWESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY. ERROR TO THE COUET OF CIVIL APPEALS OF THE SECOND SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF TEXAS. No. 155. Submitted January 31, 1901. Decided April 22, 1901. Article 5043c of the Revise
Bedford v. Eastern Building & Loan Ass'n
BEDFORD v. EASTERN BUILDING AND LOAN ASSOCIATION. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 153. Argued January 30, 31, 1901. Decided April 22, 1901. The Building Association, a corporation organized under the la
International Navigation Co. v. Farr & Bailey Manufacturing Co.
INTERNATIONAL NAVIGATION COMPANY v. FARR AND BAILEY MANUFACTURING COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD circuit. No. 193. Argued March 12, 13, 1901. Decided April 22, 1901. The Harter act, so-called, does not rel
Rasmussen v. Idaho
RASMUSSEN v. IDAHO. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO. No. 215. Submitted March 18, 1900. Decided April 22, 1901. The provision in the statute of March 13, 1899, of Idaho that “ whenever the governor of the State of Idaho has
Gregory v. Pike
No. 413. Gregory v. Pike. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts. Motions to dismiss or affirm submitted April 8, 1901. Decided April 15, 1901. Mr. Thomas H. Talbot for the motions. Mr. F. A. Br
Fairbank v. United States
FAIRBANK v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OE THE UNITED .STATES E0R THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. No. 226. Argued December 13, 1900. Decided April 15, 1901. A stamp tax on a foreign bill of lading is, in substance and effect, equi
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.