Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1902 Cases
226 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
McFaddin v. Evans-Snider-Buel Co.
McFADDIN v. EVANS-SNIDER-BUEL COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 217. Argued April 10, 11, 1902. — Decided May 19, 1902. The judgment of the Circuit Court of Appeals, sustaining the act of February S,
Southwestern Coal Co. v. McBride
SOUTHWESTERN COAL COMPANY v. McBRIDE. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 230. Argued April 21, 1902. Decided May 19, 1902. The act of Congress, approved June 28, 1898, known as tlie Curtis Act, did not oper
United States v. Copper Queen Mining Co.
UNITED STATES v. COPPER QUEEN MINING COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF ARIZONA. No. 218. Argued April 11, 14, 1902. — Decided May 19, 1902. In this case there is nothing whatever in the bill of exceptions to show that
Swafford v. Templeton
SWAFFORD v. TEMPLETON. ERROR TO THE' CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ■ TENNESSEE. No. 487. Submitted April 14, 1902. — Decided May 19, 1902. The court below erred in dismissing this action, for want of jurisdiction, as the right w
Barr Car Co. v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.
No. 648. Barr Car Company v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Company. Seventh Circuit. Denied May 5, 1902. Mr. John W. Munday for the petitioner. Mr. George S. Payson opposing.
Carnegie Steel Co. v. Cambria Iron Co.
CARNEGIE STEEL COMPANY v. CAMBRIA IRON COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 17. Argued October 17, 18, 21, 1901. — Decided Decided May 5, 1902. Patent No..404,414, issued Junó 4, 1889, to William R.
Minnesota v. Hitchcock
MINNESOTA v. HITCHCOCK. ORIGINAL. No. 4. Original. Argued November 1, 4, 1901. — Decided Decided May 5, 1902. The original jurisdiction, vested by the Constitution in this court over controversies in which a State is a party, is not affecte
Travellers' Insurance v. Connecticut
TRAVELLERS’ INSURANCE COMPANY v. CONNECTICUT. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ERRORS OF THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT. No. 219. Argued April 14, 15, 1902. — Decided Decided May 5, 1902. The legislation of the State of Connecticut, in respect to th
Woodworth v. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance
WOODWORTH v. NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 222. Argued April 16,1902. Decided May 5, 1902. The obligee in a bond which supersedes an order confirming a
New Orleans Waterworks Co. v. Louisiana
NEW ORLEANS WATERWORKS COMPANY v. LOUISIANA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OF LOUISIANA. No. 590. Submitted March 10, 1902. Decided May 5, 1902. In order to warrant the exercise by this court of jurisdiction over the judgments of
Fidelity Mutual Life Ass'n v. Mettler
FIDELITY MUTUAL LIFE ASSOCIATION v. METTLER. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF "TEXAS. No. 165. Argued January 31, 1902. Decided May 5, 1902. The classification of life and health insurance compani
Lee Gon Yung v. United States
LEE GON YUNG v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE OIROHIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES ‘FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. ■ Argued January 7,1902. Decided May 5, 1902. Fok Yung Yo v. United States, ante 296, followed. The authority of the
Fok Yung Yo v. United States
FOK YUNG YO v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 478. Argued January 7, 1902. Decided May 5, 1902. The power to exclude or expel aliens is vested in the political
Excelsior Wooden Pipe Co. v. Pacific Bridge Co.
EXCELSIOR WOODEN PIPE COMPANY v. PACIFIC BRIDGE COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON. No. 375. Submitted February 3, 1902. Decided May 5, 1902. Where the decree of a Circuit Court and th
Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. Truskett
No. 229. Missouri, Kansas and Texas Railway Company v. Truskett. Error to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Argued April 18 and 21, 1902. Decided April 28, 1902. Mr. James Hagerman, Mr. Clifford L. Jackson a
United States v. Van Duzee
UNITED STATES v. VAN DUZEE. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 604. Submitted and argued March 24, 1902. Decided April 28, 1902. Section 19 of the act of May 28, 1896, c. 252, providing that “ the terms of office of all commissioners of t
Covington v. Covington First National Bank
COVINGTON v. COVINGTON FIRST NATIONAL BANK. APPEAL EROM THE COURT OE CLAIMS. No. 604. Argued and submitted March 24,1902. Decided April 28, 1902. Matters within the pleadings in this case having been left undetermined by the court below, an
United States v. Green
UNITED STATES v. GREEN. CHRISTIE v. UNITED STATES. APPEALS FROM THE COURT OF PRIVATE LAND CLAIMS. Nos. 109, 129. Argued January 27, 28,1902. Decided April 28, 1902. The terms of the act of- March 3, 1891, 26 Stat. 854, (establishing the Cou
United States v. Guggenheim Smelting Co.
No. 631. United States v. Guggenheim Smelting Company. Third Circuit. Denied April 21, 1902. Mr. Attorney General, Mr. Solicitor General Richards and Mr. Assistant Attorney General Hoyt for the petitioner. - Mr. Paul Fuller opposing.
Train v. United States
No. 637. Train v. United States. Second Circuit. Denied April 21, 1902. Mr. Albert Comstock for the petitioners. Mr. Attorney General and Mr. Solicitor General Richards opposing.
Washington State v. Northern Securities Co.
WASHINGTON STATE v. NORTHERN SECURITIES COMPANY. ORIGINAL. Argued April 14, 1902. Decided April 21, 1902. In the exercise of original jurisdiction by this court the usual practice in , equity cases is to hear applications for leave to file
United States v. Finnell
UNITED STATES v. FINNELL. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 523. Submitted February 28, 1902. Decided April 21, 1902. The District and Circuit Courts of the United States are always open for the transaction of some business which may be
United States v. Lee Yen Tai
UNITED STATES v. LEE YEN TAI. CHIN BAK KAN v. UNITED STATES. CHIN YING v. UNITED STATES. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. APPEALS FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
United States v. Pendell
UNITED STATES v. PENDELL. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF PRIVATE LAND CLAIMS. No. 211. Submitted March 20, 1902. Decided April 21, 1902. This was an appeal from a decree of the Court of Private Land Claims, confirming the title of the appellees t
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.