Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1902 Cases
226 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
De Gigmac v. United States
No. 620. De Gigmac v. United States. Seventh Circuit. Denied April 14, 1902. Mr. William S. Forrest for the petitioners. Mr. Attorney General, Mr. Solicitor General Pich-arás and Mr. S. H. Bethea opposing.
Walters v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad
No. 216. Walters, Administratrix, v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company. Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Nebraska. Submitted April 7, 1902. Decided April 14, 1902. Mr. N. C. Abbott for the plai
United States v. Borcherling
UNITED STATES v. BORCHERLING. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 150. Argued January 30, 31,1902. Decided April 14, 1902. The facts and law of this case were so fully and satisfactorily discussed in the Court of Claims that its opinion mi
St. Louis Consolidated Coal Co. v. Illinois
ST. LOUIS CONSOLIDATED COAL COMPANY v. ILLINOIS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP ILLINOIS. No. 197. Submitted March 19, 1902. Decided April 14, 1902. It is within, the power of a state legislature to provide for the appointment o
Talbot v. Sioux National Bank
TALBOT v. SIOUX NATIONAL BANK. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IOWA. No. 190. Argued March 17,1902. Decided April 14, 1902. A motion was made to dismiss on the ground that the record presented no Federal question, which was overr
Talbot v. Sioux City First National Bank
TALBOT v. SIOUX CITY FIRST NATIONAL BANK. ERROr TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OP IOWA. No. 164. Argued March. 17, 18,1902. Decided April 14, 1902. The defendant in error moved to dismiss the action on the ground that no Federal question
Hitz v. Jenks
HITZ v. JENKS. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 99. Argued January 14,15,1902. Decided April 7, 1902. The property involved in this suit is improved real estate in the city of Washington; and the controlling
Erie Railroad v. Purdy
ERIE RAILROAD COMPANY v. PURDY. error to the supreme court of the state of new TORE. No. 171. Argued and submitted March 6, 1902. — Decided April 7, 1902. Where a party, drawing in question in this court a state enactment as invalid under'
Kansas v. Colorado
KANSAS v. COLORADO. ORIGINAL. No. 10. Original. Argued February 24, 25,1902. Decided April 7, 1902. As the remedies resorted to by independent States for the determination of controversies raised by collision between them were withdrawn fro
McIntosh v. Aubrey
McINTOSH v. AUBREY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 107. Submitted January 16,1902. Decided April 7, 1902. Section 4747 of the Revised Statutes, which provides that no sum of money • due, or to become due, to an
Eastern Building & Loan Ass'n v. Ebaugh
EASTERN BUILDING AND LOAN ASSOCIATION v. EBAUGH. EEEOE TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA. No. 177. Argued March 3, 1902. Decided April 7, 1902. This case • was presented to the court below with the facts found by the trial
Michigan Sugar Co. v. Michigan
MICHIGAN SUGAR COMPANY v. MICHIGAN. •ERROR TO THE SUFREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN. No. 199. Argued March 20, 21, 1902. Decided April 7, 1902. The rule reiterated that this court lias no jurisdiction under the third division of sectio
Filhiol v. Maurice
FILHIOL v. MAURICE. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS. No. 50. Argued March 5, 6, 1902. Decided April 7, 1902. In an action of ejectment against private individuals, the jurisdiction of the
New York City v. Pine
NEW YORK CITY v. PINE. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 491. Argued February 25, 26,1902. Decided April 7, 1902. The time at which a party appeals to a court of equity for relief affects largely the cha
Rodgers v. United States
RODGERS v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 317. Argued February 26,1902. Decided April 7, 1902. Where there are two statutes, the earlier special and the later general, (the terms of the general being broad enough to inc
Vicksburg Waterworks Co. v. Vicksburg
VICKSBURG WATERWORKS COMPANY v. VICKSBURG. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI. No. 392. Submitted December 4,1901. Decided April 7, 1902. By the act of March 18, 1886, the city of Vic
Wilson v. Iseminger
WILSON v. ISEMINGER. ERROR TO THE' SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP PENNSYLVANIA. No. 193. Argued March 19, 1902. Decided April 7, 1902. The seventh section of the act of Pennsylvania of April 27, 1855, is as follows: “ That in all cases where
French-Glenn Live Stock Co. v. Colwell
FRENCH-GLENN LIVE STOCK COMPANY v. COLWELL. EBBOE TO THE SUPREME COURT OF OREGON. No. 125. Argued January 20, 21, 1902, Decided April 7, 1902. French-Glenn Live Stock Company v. Springer, ante, p. 47, affirmed and followed.. This case was a
French-Glenn Live Stock Co. v. Springer
FRENCH-GLENN LIVE STOCK COMPANY v. SPRINGER. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON. No. 124. Argued January 20, 21, 1902. Decided April 7, 1902. A Federal question was presented by the contentions of the plaintiff in error, and
Sweringen v. St. Louis
SWERINGEN v. ST. LOUIS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI. No. 187. Argued March 4, 5, 1902. Decided April 7, 1902. The question involved in this case upon the merits is, in substance, whether the plaintiff is entitled to
Stockard v. Morgan
STOCKARD v. MORGAN. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF TENNESSEE. No 195. Submitted March 19,1802. Decided April 7, 1902. Giving to the statute of Tennessee the same meaning that was given to it by the Supreme Court of that State, w
Tulare Irrigation District v. Shepard
TULARE IRRIGATION DISTRICT v. SHEPARD. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 508. Submitted January 13,1902. Decided March 24, 1902. The Tulare irrigation_district, in. California, issu
Howard v. United States
HOWARD v. UNITED STATES.. error to the united states circuit court of appeals for the eighth circuit. No. 121. Argued January 20,1802. Decided March 24, 1902. This suit was upon a bond taken by a Circuit Court of the United States . from it
Gwin v. United States
GWIN v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 172. Argued February 26, 28, 1002. Decided March 24, 1902. A decree of the District Court of the United States for the N
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.