Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1904 Cases
244 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Cramer v. Wilson
CRAMER v. WILSON. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS. No. 47. Submitted November 3, 1904. Decided December 5, 1904. Where the trustee in bankruptcy sells the interest of the bankrupt in land, • the purchaser acquires only t
Hill v. McCord
HILL v. McCORD. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WISCONSIN. No. 49. Argued November 3, 4, 1904. Decided December 5, 1904. Where a commutation entry made in good faith after the passage of the act of March 3, 1891, 26 Stat. 1098, w
Helena Water Works Co. v. Helena
HELENA WATER WORKS COMPANY v. HELENA. APPEAL PROM THE UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 27. Argued October 28, 1904. Decided November 28, 1904. Nothing is to be taken against the public by implication; under
Baltimore Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. Baltimore
BALTIMORE SHIPBUILDING AND DRY DOCK COMPANY v. BALTIMORE. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE' STATE OF MARYLAND. No. 39. Argued November 2, 3, 1994. Decided November 28, 1904. A State may tax different estates in land to the different par
Citizens' National Bank v. Donnell
CITIZENS’ NATIONAL BANK OF KANSAS CITY v. DONNELL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI. No. 36. Argued November 1, 1904. Decided November 28, 1904. Under §§ 5197, 5198, U. S. Rev. Stat., a national bank which compounds inter
The Blackheath
THE BLACKHEATH. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA. No. 34. Argued October 31, 1904. Decided November 28, 1904. Admiralty has -jurisdiction of a libel in rem against a vessel for the dam
City of Seattle v. Kelleher
THE CITY OF SEATTLE v. KELLEHER. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON. No. 29. Argued October 28, 1904. Decided November 28, 1904. An assessment on lands for the entire expense of opening a stree
Birkett v. Columbia Bank
BIRKETT v. COLUMBIA BANK. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP NEW YORK. No. 26. Argued October 28, 1904. Decided November 28, 1904. Actual knowledge of the proceedings contemplated by section 17 of the Bankruptcy Act is a knowledge i
Olsen v. Smith
OLSEN v. SMITH. ERROR TO THE COURT OP CIVIL APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF TEXAS.- No. 42. Argued November 3, 1904. Decided November 28, 1904. State laws regulating pilotage, although regulations of commerc
Metropolitan Railroad v. District of Columbia
METROPOLITAN RAILROAD COMPANY v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. APPEAL PROM AND IN ERROR TO THE COURT OP APPEALS OP THE DISTRICT OP COLUMBIA. No. 16. Argued October 24, 1904. Decided November 28, 1904. A condemnation proceeding initiated before a co
Patterson v. Hewitt
PATTERSON v. HEWITT. APPEAL from the supreme court of the territory of NEW MEXICO. No. 23. Argued October 25, 26, 1904. Decided November 28, 1904. The owners of a mining claim in New Mexico transferred their interests to one of their number
Fayerweather v. Ritch
FAYERWEATHER v. RITCH. REYNOLDS v. RITCH. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Nos. 157, 158. Argued October 12, 13, 1904. Decided November 28, 1904. Where the appellant’s contention is
Kaufman v. Tredway
KAUFMAN v. TREDWAY. ERROR TO THE SUPERIOR COURT OP THE STATE OP PENNSYLVANIA. No. 17. Argued October 24, 1904. Decided November 28, 1904. In an action by a trustee in bankruptcy to recover a preferential payment the insolvency of the bankru
National Exchange Bank v. Wiley
NATIONAL EXCHANGE BANK OF TIFFIN v. WILEY. IN ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEBRASKA. No. 53. Argued November 7, 1904. Decided November 28, 1904. A warrant of attorney executed by the maker of a note and authorizing, in case of
New v. Oklahoma
NEW v. OKLAHOMA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF OKLAHOMA. No. 226. Argued October 14, 17, 1904 Decided November 28, 1904. Writs of error from this court to the Supreme Court of Oklahoma in capital cases do not lie. The facts
Bradford v. Southern Railway Co.
BRADFORD v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY. CERTIFICATE' FROM THE UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. ' No. 151. Submitted October 19, 1904. Decided November 28, 1904. The act of July 20, 1892, providing when a plaintiff
Daly v. Elton
DALY v. ELTON. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. No. 108. Argued October 11, 12, 1904. Decided November 14, 1904. Decided on authority of Dobbins v. Los Angeles, ante, p. 223. The facts are stated in the opinion. Mr. Ly
Dobbins v. Los Angeles
DOBBINS v. LOS ANGELES. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. No. 107. Argued October 11, 12, 1904. Decided November 14, 1904. While every intendment is to be made in favor of the lawfulness of the exercise of municipal pow
Wright v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad
WRIGHT v. LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY. certiorari to the circuit court of appeals for the fifth CIRCUIT. No. 20. Argued October 25, 1904. Decided November 14, 1904. The constitution and laws of Georgia do not exempt from taxatio
Thomas v. Board of Trustees of the Ohio State University
THOMAS v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY. certificate from the circuit court of appeals for the SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 43. Argued March 3, 1904. Decided November 14, 1904. Jurisdiction of a Circuit Court of the United States mus
Lubin v. Edison
No. 66. Siegmund Lubin, Appellant, v. Thomas A. Edison. Appeal from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Motion to dismiss submitted October 31, 1904. Decided November 7, 1904. Mr. Charles N. Butler for appellan
Aikens v. Wisconsin
AIKENS v. WISCONSIN. HUEGIN v. WISCONSIN. HOYT v. WISCONSIN. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP WISCONSIN. Nos. 3, 4, 5. Argued November 7, 1903. Reargued October 17, 1904. Decided November 7, 1904. Malicious mischief is a familiar
Crawford v. Burke
CRAWFORD v. BURKE. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP ILLINOIS. No. 22. Argued April 25, 26, 1904. Decided November 7, 1904. A plea puis darrien continuance waives all prior pleas and amounts to an admission of the plaintiff’s cause
Amado v. United States
AMADO v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF PORTO RICO. ' No. 33. Submitted October 25, 1904. Decided November 7, 1904. The review of the final judgment of the District Court of the United St
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.