Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1904 Cases
244 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Schweer v. Brown
SCHWEER v. BROWN. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS. No. 162. Submitted October 31, 1904. Decided November 7, 1904. Where the question is whether a District Court sitting in bankruptcy
Stevenson v. Fain
STEVENSON v. FAIN. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 8. Argued October 18, 19, 1904. Decided November 7, 1904. The Circuit. Courts do not possess original jurisdiction over controversies between citizens of
Jessup v. Trustees of the Freeholders & Commonalty
No. 25. Nathan C. Jessup, Plaintiff in Error, v. The Trustees of the Freeholders and Commonalty of the Town of Southampton. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of New York. Argued October 27, 1904. Decided October 31, 1904. Mr. Charl
Cliff v. United States
CLIFF v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OP ILLINOIS. No. 19. Argued December 2, 1903. Decided October 24, 1904. In enumerating the ingredients of oleomargarine in section 2 of the a
Binyon v. United States
No. 176. Rufus Binyon, Plaintiff in Error, v. The United States. In error to the United States Court of Appeals for the Indian Territory. Argued October 14, 1904. Decided October 17, 1904. Mr. W. H. Green for plaintiff in error. The Attorne
Secundino Mendezona y Mendezona v. United States
SECUNDINO MENDEZONA y MENDEZONA v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT.OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS. No. 584. Argued April 22, 1904. Decided May 31, 1904. Decided on authority of Kepner v. United States, ante, p. 100. No brief filed for
Dorr v. United States
DORR v. UNITED STATES. EEROR-'TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS. No. 583. Argued April 22, 1904. Decided May 31, 1904. While it is settled that the Constitution of the United States is the only source of power authorizing actio
Kepner v. United States
KEPNER v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS. No. 244. Argued April 22, 1904. Decided May 31, 1904. The expressed declarations of the President in Military Order,- No. 58, of April 23, 1900, and in the act o
Schick v. United States
SCHICK v. UNITED STATES. BROADWELL v. UNITED STATES. • ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. Nos. 222, 223. Argued December 2, 1903. Decided May 31, 1904. A written waiver of a jury by a def
McCray v. United States
McCRAY v. UNITED STATES. - ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOI1 THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. No. 301. Argued December 2, 1903. Decided May 31, 1904. The judiciary is without authority to avoid an act of Congress lawfully
Bradley v. Lightcap
BRADLEY v. LIGHTCAP. No. 3. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR ' ' THE' NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 343. Argued April 21, 1904. Decided May 31, 1904. A case does not necessarily arise under the constitution or law
Bradley v. Lightcap
BRADLEY v. LIGHTCAP. No. 2. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE . STATE OF ILLINOIS., No. 306. Argued April 21, 1904. Decided May 31, 1904. This case having been decided by the state court on the ¡authority of its own decision in a case betwe
Bradley v. Lightcap
BRADLEY v. LIGHTCAP. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP ILLINOIS. No. 243. Argued April 21, 1904. Decided May 31, 1904. 1. By the law of Illinois in respect of mortgages the legal title passes to the mortgagee,, who is entitled to p
Fetzer v. Kohn
No. 697. No. 698. John C. Fetzer et al., Receivers, etc., et al., Petitioners, v. David A. Kohn et al.; and John C. Fetzer et al., Receivers, etc., et al., Petitioners, v. Jacob Miller et al.
Insurance Co. of North America v. Norwich & New York Transportation Co.
No. 681. No. 682. No. 683. No. 684. Insurance Company of North America, Petitioner, v. Norwich and New York Transportation Company; Security Insurance Company of New Haven, Petitioner, v. Norwich and New York Transportation Company; Fireman
Mexican Central Railway Co. v. Robinson
No. 663. Mexican Central Railway Company (Limited), Petitioner, v. H. A. Robinson.
Ward v. Cleveland Trust Co.
No. 728. Carrie M. Ward, Plaintiff in Error, v. Cleveland Trust Company et al.
Field v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.
FIELD v. BARBER ASPHALT PAVING COMPANY. BARBER ASPHALT PAVING COMPANY v. FIELD. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. . Nos. 201, 202. Argued April 11, 1904. Decided May 31, 1904. Where th
International Postal Supply Co. v. Bruce
INTERNATIONAL POSTAL SUPPLY COMPANY v. BRUCE. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 215. Argued April 13, 14, 1904 Decided May 31, 1904. Complainant as the owner of letters patent for a cancelling and pos
Shaw v. City of Covington
SHAW v. CITY OF COVINGTON. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY. No. 246. Argued April 22, 25, 1904. Decided May 31, 1904. Corporations having consolidated under a state statute providing t
Chandler v. Dix
CHANDLER v. DIX. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. No. 261. Argued April 28,1904. Decided May 31, 1904. An action cannot be maintained in thé Federal courts to set aside tax sales on th
Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. Indiana ex rel. Ketcham
TERRE HAUTE AND INDIANAPOLIS RAILROAD COMPANY v. INDIANA ex rel. KETCHAM. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF INDIANA.' No. 264. Argued April 29, May 2, 1904. Decided May 31, 1904. Where the state court has sustained a result which c
Burrell v. Montana
BURRELL v. MONTANA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP MONTANA. No. 218. Submitted April 13, 1904. Decided May 31, 1904. A witness who voluntarily testifies cannot resist the effect -of the testimony .by claiming that he could not h
Shepard v. Barron
SHEPARD v. BARRON. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. No. 217. Argued April 14, 15, 1964. Decided May 31, 1904. Where a public improvement is completed, and the assessment made at the insta
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.