Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1904 Cases
244 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Kirby v. American Soda Fountain Co.
KIRBY v. AMERICAN SODA FOUNTAIN COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED' STATES FOB THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. No. 357. Submitted March 21, 1904. Decided April 25, 1904, The general rule is that when the jurisdiction of a
Weil v. Bloomingdale
No. 251. Charles Weil et al., Plaintiff in Error, v. Emanuel W. Bloomingdale, as Assignee, etc., et al.
Hamburg-American Steamship Co. v. Lennan
No. 622. Hamburg-American Steamship Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Mary W. Lennan, as Executrix of the Last Will and Testament of John M. Lennan, Deceased.
Southern Railway Co. v. Carson
SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. CARSON. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA. No. 546. Submitted April 4, 1904. Decided April 18, 1904. In an action in which no application for removal to the Federal court was made at any.
Nederland Life Insurance v. Meinert
No. 624. Nederland Life Insurance Company (Limited), Petitioner, v. Mary Meinert.
Morning Journal Ass'n v. Duke
No. 629. Morning Journal Association, Petitioner, v. James H. Duke.
Linton v. Heye
No. 508. Phœbe R. E. E. Linton et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Fred Heye et al.
Rawson v. Western Sand Blast Co.
OPINIONS PER CURIAM, ETC., FROM APRIL 5, 1904,' TO MAY 31, 1904. No. 168. Charles L. Rawson et al., Petitioners, v. Western Sand Blast Company et al.
Slater v. Mexican National Railroad
SLATER v. MEXICAN NATIONAL RAILROAD COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE, FIFTH - CIRCUIT. No. 162. Argued February 20, 1904. Decided April 11, 1904. A common law action cannot be maintained in a Circuit Court of the
Pacific Electric Railway Co. v. Los Angeles
PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. LOS ANGELES. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 175. Argued March 7,1904. Decided April 11, 1904. The jurisdiction of the Circuit Court is esta
Bates & Guild Co. v. Payne
BATES & GUILD CO. v. PAYNE. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA^ No. 373. Argued March 10, 1904. Decided April 11, 1904. Where the decision of questions of fact is committed by Congress to the • judgment and discret
Smith v. Payne
SMITH v. PAYNE. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 481. Argued March 10, 1904. Decided April 11, 1904. What are periodicals and second class matter decided on authority of Houghton v. Payne, ante, p. 88. This
Houghton v. Payne
HOUGHTON v. PAYNE. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 372. Argued March 10, 1904. Decided April 11, 1904. Contemporaneous construction is a rule of interpretation but it is not an absolute one and does not pre
Beavers v. Henkel
BEAVERS v. HENKEL. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF- THE UNITED STATES FOE THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 535. Argued March 9, 10, 1904. Decided April 11, 1904. Statutory provisions must be interpreted in the light of all that may b
Minnesota v. Northern Securities Co.
MINNESOTA v. NORTHERN SECURITIES COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. No. 433. Argued January 7, 8, 1904. Decided April 11, 1904. Consent of parties can never confer jurisdiction upon a
American Water Works & Guaranty Co. v. City of Little Rock
CASES DISPOSED OF WITHOUT CONSIDERATION BY THE COURT FROM APRIL 5, 1904, TO MAY 31, 1904. No. 248. American Water Works and Guaranty Company, Appellant, v. City of Little Rock et al.
Interstate Commerce Commission v. Baird
INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION v. BAIRD. APPEAL, FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN' DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 409. Argued March 7, 8, 1901. Decided April 4, 1904. The object of construction is to ascertain the leg
Brown v. Schleier
BROWN v. SCHLEIER. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 188. Argued March 18,1994. Decided April 4, 1904. A.national bank erected a building on leased property, the lease securing the landlord by a lien^on th
People's Gas Light & Coke Co. v. Chicago
PEOPLE’S GAS LIGHT AND COKE COMPANY v. CHICAGO. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 132. Argued January 20,1904. Decided April 4, 1904. Where the contract claimed to have been impair
Hall v. First National Bank
No. 567. Helen Potts Hall, Appellant, v. The First National Bank of Bridgeport et al. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Connecticut; April 4, 1904..
Wright v. Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance
WRIGHT v. MINNESOTA MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT -OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. No. 178. Argued March 15, 1904. Decided April 4, 1904. An insurance association organized on the assessmen
United States v. Commonwealth Title Insurance & Trust Co.
UNITED STATES v. COMMONWEALTH TITLE INSURANCE AND TRUST COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 172. Submitted March 3,1904. Decided April 4, 1904. A mortgagee who has foreclosed his mortgage and purchased the property mortgaged at sh
National Mutual Building & Loan Ass'n v. Brahan
NATIONAL MUTUAL BUILDING AND LOAN ASSOCIATION v. BRAHAN. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP MISSISSIPPI. No. 158. Argued February 25, 26,1904. Decided April 4, 1904. Where the plaintiff in error, defendant below, after filing a gene
Pope v. Williams
POPE v. WILLIAMS. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND. No. 503. Argued March 8, 9,1904. Decided April 4, 1904. While the privilege to vote may not be abridged by a State on account of race, color and previous condition of
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.