Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1904 Cases
244 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Dimmick v. Tompkins
DIMMICK v. TOMPKINS. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN- DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 528. Submitted May 16, 1904. Decided May 31, 1904. An appeal directly to this court from the Circuit Court denying a writ
Cleveland v. Cleveland Electric Railway Co.
CLEVELAND v. CLEVELAND ELECTRIC RAILWAY COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. No. 256. Argued April 26, 27, 1904. Decided May 31, 1904. Decided on authority of Cleveland v. City Railw
City of Cleveland v. Cleveland City Railway Co.
CITY OF CLEVELAND v. CLEVELAND CITY RAILWAY COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR ' THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. No. 255. Argued April 27, 1904. Decided May 31, 1904. Where the complainant does not base the contr
Public Clearing House v. Coyne
PUBLIC CLEARING HOUSE v. COYNE. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 224. Argued April 18, 1904. Decided May 31, 1904. The power vested in Congress to establish post offices and post
Wynn-Johnson v. Shoup
WYNN-JOHNSON v. SHOUP. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT. COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA. No. 266. Submitted April 28, 1904. Decided May 31, 1904. Decided on authority of Binns v. United States, ante, p. 486. Mr. S. M. Stockslage
Binns v. United States
BINNS v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR , THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA. Nos. 196, 266. Submitted April 6, 1904. Decided May 31, 1904. While it may not be within the power of Congress by a special system of lic
Knepper v. Sands
KNEPPER v. SANDS. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 233. Submitted April 19, 1904. Decided May 31, 1904. Section 4 of the act of March 3, 1887, 24 Stat. 556, for the adjustment of forfeited railroad g
Crowley v. United States
CROWLEY v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF PORTO RICO. No. 205. Submitted April 12, 1904. Decided May 31, 1904. Where the accused contends in the District Court of the United States for th
In re Christensen Engineering Co.
MATTER OF CHRISTENSEN ENGINEERING COMPANY. IN THE SUPREME COURT OP THE UNITED STATES. No. 15, Original. Submitted April 25, 1904. Decided May 31, 1904. When an order imposing a fine for violation of an injunction is substantially one to rei
Kerr v. Union Marine Insurance
No. 662. John E. Kerr et al., Petitioners, v. Union Marine Insurance Company, Limited.
Kimbell v. Chicago Hydraulic Press Brick Co.
No. 258. Charles B. Kimbell et al., Appellants, v. Chicago Hydraulic Press Brick Company et al.
Davis v. Mills
DAVIS v. MILLS. CERTIFICATE* FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 235. Argued April 19, 1904. Decided May 16, 1904. Section 554 of the Montana Code of Civil Procedure, limiting actions to enforce a special statutory
Ohio ex rel. Lloyd v. Dollison
OHIO ex rel. LLOYD v. DOLLISON. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP OHIO. No. 262. Argued April 28, 29, 1901. Decided May 16, 1904. The first eight articles of the amendments to the Constitution of the United States have reference to
Swarts v. Hammer
SWARTS v. HAMMER. ■' APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 238. Argued April 20, 1904. Decided May 16, 1904. Where Congress has the power to exempt property from taxation the intention must be clearly expresse
Charnock v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.
CHARNOCK v. TEXAS AND PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 194. Argued April 8, 1904. Decided May 16, 1904. Negligence has-always relation to the circumstances in which one is placed, and
Cau v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.
CAU v. TEXAS AND PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 57. Argued April 8, 1904. Decided May 16, 1904. While primarily the responsibility of a common carrier is that expressed by the commo
Hooker v. Burr
HOOKER v. BURR. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. No. 263. Submitted April 26, 1904 Decided May 16, 1904. A- party insisting upon the. invalidity of a statute as.violating any constitutional provision must show that he
Hy-Yu-Tse-Mil-Kin v. Smith
HY-YU-TSE-MIL-KIN v. SMITH. APPEAL ER’OM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH . -CIRCUIT. No. 209. Submitted April 12, 1904. Decided May 16, 1904. An Indian woman, head of a family of the Walla Walla tribe, having asked under the act
United States v. Anderson
UNITED STATES v. ANDERSON. APPEAL PROM THE COURT, OP CLAIMS.- ' No. 560. Submitted Match 21, 1904. Decided May 16, 1904. By the fiction of relation, where thé interest of justice demands it, the legal-title may be held .to relate back to th
Morris v. Hitchcock
MORRIS v. HITCHCOCK. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 272. Submitted April 29, 1904. Decided May 16, 1904. The constitutionality of the Curtis Act, 30 Stat. 495, for the protection of the Indian Territory ha
Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'n v. Edwards
SUN PRINTING AND PUBLISHING ASSOCIATION v. EDWARDS. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 239. Argued April 20, 1904. Decided May 16, 1904. An allegation in the complaint-, which is admitted by the answer
Schefe v. St. Louis
SCHEFE v. ST. LOUIS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI.. No. 62. Argued April 12, 1904. Decided May 16, 1904. Decided on authority of Fischer v. St. Louis, ante, p. 361. Mr. G. N. Fickeissen,. with whom Mr. J. D. Johnson w
Fischer v. St. Louis
FISCHER v. ST. LOUIS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI. No. 204. Argued April 12, 1904. Decided May 16, 1904. It is within the power of a municipality when authorized by the law of the State, to make a general police regu
Filhiol v. Torney
FILHIOL v. TORNEY. EBBOB TO THE CIBCUIT COUET OF THE UNITED STATES FOE THE EASTEBN DISTEICT OF ABKANSAS. No. 252. Submitted April 25, 1904. Decided May 16, 1904. Where, in an ejectment action, the plaintiffs’ statement of their right to the
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.