Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1905 Cases
220 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Board of Trade v. Hammond Elevator Co.
BOARD OF TRADE OF CITY OF CHICAGO v. HAMMOND ELEVATOR COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 215. Argued April 13, 1905. Decided May 29, 1905. The authorities, holding that the
Leonard v. Vicksburg, Shreveport & Pacific Railroad
LEONARD v. VICKSBURG, SHREVEPORT AND PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA. No. 233. Argued April 26, 27, 1905. Decided May 29, 1905. THe rule reiterated that persons may by their acts, or omissions
Cimiotti Unhairing Co. v. American Fur Refining Co.
CIMIOTTI UNHAIRING COMPANY v. AMERICAN FUR REFINING COMPANY CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 192. Argued March 17, 1905. Decided May 15, 1905. A greater degree of liberality and a wider range of equivale
Savannah, Thunderbolt & Isle of Hope Railway v. Savannah
SAVANNAH, THUNDERBOLT AND ISLE OF HOPE RAILWAY v. SAVANNAH. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF GEORGIA. No. 238. Argued April 28, 1905. Decided May 15, 1905. There is no foundation for the jurisdiction of this court to review the ju
Birrell v. New York & Harlem Railroad
BIRRELL v. NEW YORK AND HARLEM RAILROAD COMPANY. KIERNS v. NEW YORK AND HARLEM RAILROAD COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. Nos. 202, 203. Argued April 27, 28, 1005. Decided May 15, 1905. Muhlker v. Harlem R. R. Co
Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. United States
CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE AND ST. PAUL RAILWAY COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 198. Submitted April 6, 1905. Decided May 15, 1905. The Postmaster General is given the power to arrange the railway routes upon which th
United States v. Winans
UNITED STATES v. WINANS. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON. No. 180. Argued April 3, 4, 1905. Decided May 15, 1905. This court will construe a treaty with Indians as they understood it and as
Clark v. Nash
CLARK v. NASH. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT, OF THE STATE OF UTAH. No. 218. Argued April 19, 20, 1905. Decided May 15, 1905. Whether the statute of a State permitting condemnation by an individual for the purpose of obtaining water for his la
Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. Pennsylvania
DELAWARE, LACKAWANNA AND WESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY v. PENNSYLVANIA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 208. Argued April 10, 1905. Decided May 15, 1905. A tax on the value of the capital stock of a corporation is a
Harding v. Harding
HARDING v. HARDING. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. No. 222. Argued April 20, 1905. Decided May 15, 1905. Pursuant to. the statutes of Illinois, a wife living apart from her husband, both being citizens of Illinois, s
Thompson v. Darden
THOMPSON v. DARDEN. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF VIRGINIA. No. 159. Argued March 3, 1905. Decided May 15, 1905. Congress has power to permit,' a^d by the act of 1789 and § 4235, Rev. Stat., has permitted, the severa
Old Dominion Steamship Co. v. Virginia
OLD DOMINION STEAMSHIP COMPANY v. VIRGINIA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF VIRGINIA. No. 231. Argued April, 25, 26, 1905. Decided May 15, 1905. The general rule that tangible personal property is subject to taxation b
Empire State-Idaho Mining & Developing Co. v. Hanley
EMPIRE STATE-IDAHO MINING AND DEVELOPING COMPANY v. HANLEY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 604. Submitted May 1, 1905. Decided May 15, 1905. Where the jurisdiction of the Circuit Court is invoked on the'
First National Bank v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF CHICAGO v. CHICAGO TITLE & TRUST COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 139. Argued January 19, 20, 1905. Decided May 15, 1905. The trustee in bankruptcy claiming the right' o
Darnal v. United States
No. 641. Louis A. Darnal, Petitioner, v. The United States. May 8, 1905. Mr. W. M. Smith for petitioner. No brief filed for respondent:
United States v. Ju Toy
UNITED STATES v. JU TOY. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 535. Argued April 3, 1905. Decided May 8, 1905. Even though the Fifth Amendment does apply to one seeking entrance to this country, and to den
Board of Trade v. Christie Grain & Stock Co.
BOARD OF TRADE OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO v. CHRISTIE GRAIN AND STOCK COMPANY. L. A. KINSEY COMPANY v. BOARD OF TRADE OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF
Harley v. United States
HARLEY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 195. Argued April 6, 1905. Decided May 8, 1905. In order to give the Court of Claims jurisdiction under the act of March 3, 1887, the demand sued on must be founded on a conventi
Harris v. Balk
HARRIS v. BALK. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. 191. Argued April 4, 1905. Decided May 8, 1905. A citizen of North Carolina who owed money to another citizen of that State, was, while temporarily in Maryland,
Holden v. Stratton
HOLDEN v. STRATTON. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 209. Submitted April 6, 1905. Decided May 8, 1905. The statute of the Stale of Washington, Laws of 1897, p., 70, exempting ’ -proceeds or avails of al
Riverdale Cotton Mills v. Alabama & Georgia Manufacturing Co.
RIVERDALE COTTON MILLS, PETITIONER v. ALABAMA AND GEORGIA MANUFACTURING COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 194. Argued April 5, 6, 1905. Decided May 8, 1905. A Federal court exercising a jurisdict
W. L. Wells Co. v. Gastonia Cotton Manufacturing Co.
W. L. WELLS COMPANY v. GASTONIA COTTON MANUFACTURING COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 237. Argued April 28, 1905. Decided May 8, 1905. The charter of a corporation in Mississippi provided that
Schlosser v. Hemphill
SCHLOSSER v. HEMPHILL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IOWA. No. 176. Argued March 13, 14, 1905. Decided May 8, 1905. Where the judgment of the highest court of a State, in reversing a judgment against defendant, does not direct
In re Glaser
Ex parte: In re GLASER, PETITIONER. ORIGINAL. No. 16. Original. Submitted April 20, 1905. Decided May 8, 1905. Since the passage of the act of March 3,1891, this court has no jurisdiction to review judgments or decrees of the District and C
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.