Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1905 Cases
220 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Clyatt v. United States
CLYATT v. UNITED STATES. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 235. Argued December 13, 14, 1904. Decided March 13, 1905. Peonage is a status or condition of compulsory service based upon the indebtedness of
Caro v. Davidson
CARO v. DAVIDSON. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. No. 196. Submitted January 23, 1905. Decided March 13, 1905. Where the record discloses no title, right, privilege or immunity, specially set up or claimed under the Cons
Dallemagne v. Moisan
DALLEMAGNE v. MOISAN. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OP CALIFORNIA. No. 104. Submitted December 15, 1904. Decided March 13, 1905. Power may be conferred upon a átate officer, as such, to execut
Harriman v. Northern Securities Co.
HARRIMAN v. NORTHERN SECURITIES COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 512. Argued March 1, 2, 1905. Decided March 6, 1905. Opinion delivered April 3, 1905. After affirmance of the decree in the North
Gregg v. Metropolitan Trust Co.
GREGG v. METROPOLITAN TRUST COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 141. Argued January 20, 23, 1905. Decided March 6, 1905. Claims for supplies furnished to a railroad company within six months before
McClaine v. Rankin
McCLAINE v. RANKIN. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 58. Argued November 10, 1904. Decided March 6, 1905. In the absence of any provision of the act of Congress creating the liability of .stockholders of nati
Johnson v. Thomas
No. 312. Edward D. Johnson et al., Appellants, v. Elizabeth Thomas. Appeal from the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia. Motion to dismiss submitted February 20, 1905. Decided February 27, 1905.
District of Columbia v. Barnes
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. BARNES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 143. Argued January 23, 1905. Decided February 27, 1905. Findings of fact made by the Court of Claims are conclusive here, and the jurisdiction of this court is limited to
United States v. Whitridge
UNITED STATES v. WHITRIDGE. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 413. Argued January 27, 30, 1905. Decided February 27, 1905. Under the proviso of § 25 of the act of Congress of August 27, 1898, 28 Stat. 50
Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. Texas
SOUTHERN COTTON OIL COMPANY v. TEXAS. ERROR to the court of civil appeals in and for the third* SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF TEXAS. No. 38. Argued November 1, 2, 1904. Decided February 27, 1905. Decided on the authority of .Nat
National Cotton Oil Co. v. Texas
NATIONAL COTTON OIL COMPANY v. TEXAS. ERROR TO THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS IN AND FOR THE THIRD SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF TEXAS. No. 37. Argued November 1, 2, 1901. Decided February 27, 1905. The Anti-Trust Acts of Texas of 1
San Francisco National Bank v. Dodge
SAN FRANCISCO NATIONAL BANK v. DODGE. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH ' CIRCUIT. No. 44. Argued November 7, 1904. Decided February 27, 1905. Section 5219, Rev. Stat., authorizes the taxation by the States of shares of
Kehrer v. Stewart
KEHRER v. STEWART. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF .GEORGIA. No. 152. Argued January 24, 25, 1905. Decided February 27, 1905. As a tax upon the seller of goods is a tax upon the goods themselves, and a tax upon goods sold in one
Utermehle v. Norment
UTERMEHLE v. NORMENT. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS'OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 63. Argued November 28, 29, 1904. Decided February 20, 1905. Mere ignorance of the law standing, alone does not constitute any defense against its enforcem
Jacobson v. Massachusetts
JACOBSON v. MASSACHUSETTS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP MASSACHUSETTS. No. 70. Argued December 6, 1904. Decided February 20, 1905. The' United States does not derive any of its substantive powers from the Preamble of the.Const
Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Hasse
NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. HASSE. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. No. 118. Submitted January 6, 1905. Decided February 20, 1905. This'case is governed by the'decision in Northern Pacific Railway Company v. To
Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Ely
NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. ELY. SAME v. SAME. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. Nos. 102, 88. Submitted December 15, 1904. Decided February 20, 1905. Northern Pacific Railway Company v. Townsend, 190 U. S. 267,
Thompson v. Skillin
No. 518. J. Campbell Thompson, Petitioner, v. Augustus H. Skillin, Trustee, etc. February 20, 1905. Mr. Royer Foster for petitioner. Mr. William Jno. Barr for respondent.
Scottish Union & National Insurance v. Bowland
SCOTTISH UNION AND NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. BOWLAND. BOWLAND v. SCOTTISH UNION AND NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. Nos. 360, 361. Argued January 4, 5, 1
Coulter v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad
COULTER v. LOUISVILLE AND NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY. •APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY. No. 244. Argued November 29, 30, 1904.— Decided February 20, 1905. A railroad company in Kentuck
The Germanic
THE GERMANIC. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 128. Argued January 13, 16, 1905— Decided February 20, 1905. \ foreign vessel from Liverpool arrived at its destination, New York, and made fast to the wha
Doctor v. Harrington
DOCTOR v. HARRINGTON. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 477. Submitted January 25, 1905.— Decided February 20, 1905. The presumption of law that stockholders are deemed to be citiz
United States v. Montana Lumber & Manufacturing Co.
UNITED STATES v. MONTANA LUMBER AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 125. Argued January 13, 1905.— Decided February 20, 1905. While the grant to the Northern Pacific Railroad C
McCaffrey v. Manogue
McCAFFREY v. MANOGUE. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.' No. 131. Argued January 17, 18, 1905.— Decided February 20, 1905. The policy of the law in favor of the heir yields to the intention of the testator, if cl
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.