Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1905 Cases
220 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
In re Heff
MATTER OF HEFF. ORIGINAL. No. 14. Argued January 9, 10, 1905. Decided April 10, 1905. The recognized relation between the Government and the Indians is that of a superior and an inferior, whereby the latter is placed under the care of the f
In re Commonwealth of Massachusetts
In re COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, Petitioner. original. No. 15. Argued February 27, 28, 1905. Decided April 10, 1905. In a proceeding brought by a State on petition for writs of prohibition, mandamus or certiorari, to, restrain the justi
United States v. Cadarr
UNITED STATES v. CADARR. CERTIORARI TO 'THE COURT OP APPEALS OP THE DISTRICT OP COLUMBIA. No. 438. Argued February 28, March 1, 1905. Decided April 3, 1905. Section 939 of the District of Columbia Code, providing that if any person charged
Iron Cliffs Co. v. Negaunee Iron Co.
IRON CLIFFS COMPANY v. NEGAUNEE IRON COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP MICHIGAN. No. 173. Argued March 9, 10, 1905. Decided April 3, 1905. No person can be deprived of property rights by any decree in a case wherein he is
New Orleans Gas Light Co. v. Drainage Commission of New Orleans
NEW ORLEANS GAS LIGHT COMPANY v. DRAINAGE COMMISSION OF NEW ORLEANS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA. No. 172. Argued March 8, 9, 1905. Decided April 3, 1905. The drainage of a city in the interest in the public health
H. Hackfeld & Co. v. United States
H. HACKFELD AND COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 164. Argued March 6, 1905. Decided April 3, 1905. Section 10 of the act of March 3, 1891, 26 Stat. 1084, which imposes upon one
Stillman v. Combe
STILLMAN v. COMBE. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. No. 174. Argued March 10, 13, 1905. Decided April 3, 1905. All the parties to an action in the United States Circuit Court, to deter..
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.
LOUISVILLE AND NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY v. BARBER ASPHALT PAVING COMPANY. ERROR TO THE COURT OP APPEALS' OP THE STATE OP KENTUCKY. No. 170. Argued March 7, 8, 1905. Decided. April 3, 1905. In determining whether an improvement does, or do
Lincoln v. United States
LINCOLN v. UNITED STATES. WARNER, BARNES AND COMPANY, LIMITED, v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. APPEAL FROM THE .COURT OF CLAIMS. Nos. 149, 466. Argued March 3, 1905.
Pennsylvania Lumbermen's Mutual Fire Insurance v. Meyer
PENNSYLVANIA LUMBERMEN’S MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY v. MEYER. CERTIFICATE FROM. THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 182. Argued March 14, 15, 1905 Decided April 3, 1905. In order that a Federal court may obtain juris
Middletown National Bank v. Toledo, Ann Arbor & Northern Michigan Railway Co.
MIDDLETOWN NATIONAL BANK v. TOLEDO, ANN ARBOR AND NORTHERN MICHIGAN RAILWAY COMPANY. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT' COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 167. Argued March 7, 1905. Decided April 3, 1905. Article XIII, § 3, of the cons
United States v. Smith
UNITED STATES v. SMITH. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 184. Argued March 15, 1905 Decided April 3, 1905. The word "arrest” as employed in Article 43 of § 1624, Rev. Stat., requiring service of the charge on which the accused is to be
Keppel v. Tiffin Savings Bank
KEPPEL v. TIFFIN SAVINGS BANK. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS' FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 116. Argued January 6, 1905. Decided April 3, 1905. The word “surrender,” as generally defined, may. denote either compelled or volunta
Carter v. Gear
CARTER v. GEAR. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF HAWAII. No. 442. Submitted March 3, 1905. Decided April 3, 1905. The statutes of 1892 of the Territory of Hawaii purporting to confer upon the judges of the several courts, at c
McMillen v. Ferrum Mining Co.
McMILLEN v. FERRUM MINING COMPANY. ERROR TO- THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP COLORADO. No. 185. Argued March 15, 16, 1905. Decided April 3, 1905. Where the Federal question is not raised until the petition for rehearing to the highest cou
Bishop v. United States
BISHOP v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE- COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 92. Argued March 23, 1905. Decided April 3, 1905. An officer in the Navy failing to report at the time ordered, while his vessel - was in Japanese waters, in 1865, was placed un
In re Strauss
IN THE MATTER OF STRAUSS. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 186. Argued March 1, 1905. Decided April 3, 1905. Words in the Constitution of■ the United States do not ordinarily receive a narrow and con
Chrisman v. Miller
CHRISMAN v. MILLER. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. No. 171. Argued March 8, 1905. Decided April 3, 1905. This court does not.review- questions of fact in cases coming from a state • court but accepts the conclusions
McMichael v. Murphy
McMICHAEL v. MURPHY. -ERROR TO, AND APPEAL FROM, THE SUPREME COURT OP THE TERRITORY OP OKLAHOMA. No. 166. Submitted March 7, 1905. Decided April 3, 1905. A settlement or entry on public land already covered of record by another entry, valid
Western Electrical Supply Co. v. Abbeville Electric Light & Power Co.
WESTERN ELECTRICAL SUPPLY COMPANY v. ABBEVILLE ELECTRIC LIGHT AND POWER COMPANY. error' to the supreme court of the state of south CAROLINA. No. 178. Argued March 14, 1905. Decided April 3, 1905. A foreign corporation sued in a state court
City of Dawson v. Columbia Avenue Saving Fund, Safe Deposit, Title & Trust Co.
CITY OF DAWSON v. COLUMBIA AVENUE SAVING FUND, SAFE DEPOSIT, TITLE AND TRUST COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA. No. 154. Argued January 20, 27, 1905. Decided March 27, 1905. An arr
Greer County v. Texas
GREER COUNTY, OKLAHOMA TERRITORY, v. TEXAS. ERROR TO THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS' FOR THE THIRD> SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF TEXAS. No. 160. Submitted March 6, 1905. Decided March 20, 1905. The decision in United States v. Texa
Bartlett v. United States
BARTLETT v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 259. Submitted February 27, 1905. Decided March 13, 1905. The words “waters and'shores” of a river as used in §§ 2550, 2551, Rev. Stat., are broad enough to include- the whole
United States v. Mills
UNITED STATES v. MILLS. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 509. Submitted February 20, 1905. Decided March 13, 1905. The ten per cent increase over and above pay proper allowed to an officer of the United States Army for service in Porto
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.