Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1907 Cases
247 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
United States v. Paine Lumber Co.
UNITED STATES v. PAINE LUMBER COMPANY. ÍN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT ‘OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT.OP WISCONSIN. No. 101. Submitted April 15, 1907. Decided May 27, 1907. The title of Indians to lands belonging to the tribe
Illinois Central Railroad v. Interstate Commerce Commission
ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY, GULF AND SHIP ISLAND RAILROAD COMPANY, SOUTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY v. THE INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. No. 588. Ar
Southern Railway Co. v. Tift
SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. TIFT. Appeal prom the UNIted states circuit court op appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 601. Argued April 22, 23, 1907. Decided May 27, 1907. Although an action at law for damages to recover unreasonable railroad
Security Warehousing Co. v. Hand
SECURITY WAREHOUSING COMPANY v. HAND. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 229. Argued March 7, 8, 1907. Decided May 27, 1907. The general law of pledge requires possession and it cannot rexist without it, a
Buck v. Beach
BUCK v. BEACH, TREASURER OF TIPPECANOE COUNTY, INDIANA. EEROS TO THE SUPREME. COURT OF THE STATE ÓF INDIANA. No. 14. Argued March 22, 1907. Decided May 27, 1907. The old rule of mobilia sequuntur personam has been modified so that the owner
United States v. Heinszen & Co.
UNITED STATES v. HEINSZEN & COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE. COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 580. Argued April 9, 10, 1907. Decided May 27, 1907. Congress in dealing with the Philippine Islands may delegate legislative authority to such agencies as it may se
Romeu v. Todd
ROMEU v. TODD. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COITRT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF PORTO RICO. No. 269. Argued April 19, 1907. Decided May 27, 1907. All the local law of Porto Rico is within the legislative control of Congress, and und
Love v. Flahive
LOVE v. FLAHIVE. ERROR TO THE supreme COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA. No. 236. Submitted March 8, 1907. Decided May 27, 1907. Petition for rehearing in Love v. Flahive, 205 U: S. 195, denied. A sale made by a party who is in possession ef a
Grafton v. United States
HOMER E. GRAFTON, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR v. THE UNITED STATES. IN ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS. No. 358. Argued March 18, 19, 1907. Decided May 27, 1907. The prohibition of double jeopardy is applicable to all criminal p
In re Pollitz
In re JAMES POLLITZ, PETITIONER. PETITION POR WRIT OP MANDAMUS. No. 16, Original. Argued April 8, 1907. Decided May 27, 1907. The writ of mandamus cannot be used to perform the office of-an appeal or _ writ of error; it will not issue to co
Virginia v. West Virginia
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA v. STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA. IN EQUITY. No. 7, Original. Argued March 11, 12, 1907. Decided May 27, 1907. This court has original jurisdiction of a suit by the State of Virginia against the State of West Virginia for
Kaipu ex rel. Kaipu v. Pinkham
No. 172. Emma L. Kaipu in behalf of Mikala Kaipu, Appellant, v. L. E. Pinkham, President of the Board of Health, etc. May 13, 1907. Mr. A. G. M. Robertson for appellant. Mr. Lórrin Andrews for appellee.
Alaska Treadwell Gold Mining Co. v. Cheney
No. 697. Alaska Treadwell Gold Mining Company, Petitioner, v. Z. R. Cheney, Administrator, etc. May 13, 1907. Mr. Charles J. Faulkner for petitioner. Mr. J. J. Darlington and Mr. R. W. Jennings for respondent.
Hartman v. John D. Park & Sons Co.
No. 719. Samuel B. Hartman, Petitioner, v. John D. Park & Sons Co. May 13, 1907. Mr. Frank F. Reed for petitioner. No appearance for respondent.
In re Crawford
No. —, Original. Ex parte: In the Matter of George H. Crawford, Petitioner. Submitted April 29, 1907. Decided May 13, 1907. Mr. Seth T. McCormick for petitioner. Mr. A. L..Cole, Mr. Jno. Houston Merrill and Mr. C. H. McCauley opposing.
Kessler v. Eldred
KESSLER v. ELDRED. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 196. Submitted April 17, 1907. Decided May 13, 1907. Rights between litigants once established by the final judgment of a court of competent juris
Wyoming ex rel. Wyoming Agricultural College v. Irvine
WYOMING ex rel. WYOMING AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE v. IRVINE, TREASURER OF THE STATE OF WYOMING. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WYOMING. No. 272. Argued April 19, 22, 1907. Decided May 13, 1907. The. land grants made for establishment
Smith v. Jennings
SMITH, RECEIVER, v. JENNINGS, TREASURER OF THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA. No. 104. Argued April 24, 25, 1907. Decided May 13, 1907. Whether the proceedings in the enactment of a state
Stone v. Southern Illinois & Missouri Bridge Co.
STONE v. SOUTHERN ILLINOIS AND MISSOURI BRIDGE COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI. No. 253. Argued March 24, 25, 1907. Decided May 13, 1907. Whether the statutes, of a State authorize the incorporation, of a bridge
Ellis v. United States
ELLIS v. UNITED STATES. EASTERN DREDGING COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. SAME v. SAME. SAME v. SAME. BAY STATE DREDGING COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. SAME v. SAME. SAME v. SAME. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAS
United States v. Brown
UNITED STATES v. BROWN. BROWN v. UNITED STATES. APPEALS PROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. Nos. 283, 284. Submitted April 25, 1907. Decided May 13, 1907. The prohibition in the 77th Article of War against officers of the regular army serving on cour
Georgia v. Tennessee Copper Co.
GEORGIA v. TENNESSEE COPPER COMPANY. BILL IN EQUITY. No. 5, Original. Argued February 25, 26, 1907. Decided May 13, 1907. When the States by their union made the forcible abatement of outside nuisances impossible to each, théy did not there
United States v. Farenholt
UNITED STATES v. FARENHOLT. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 277. Argued April 25, 1907. Decided May 13, 1907. A court is not always confined to the written words' of a statute; construction is to be exercised as well as interpretation
Henry E. Frankenberg Co. v. United States
HENRY E. FRANKENBERG COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 257. Argued April 12, 1907. Decided May 13, 1907. In construing a tariff act the court cannot disregard the condition upon
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.