Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1908 Cases
226 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Cook v. Mobile, Jackson & Kansas City Railroad
No. 692. Victor A. Cook, Petitioner, v. Mobile, Jackson & Kansas City Railroad Company. April 27, 1908. Mr. Hannis Taylor for petitioner. Mr. William H. McIntosh and Mr. Joseph C. Rich for respondent.
Savings Deposit Bank & Trust Co. v. Loeser
No. 171. The Savings Deposit Bank & Trust Company of Elyria, Ohio, Appellant, v. Nathan Loeser, Trustee of the Estate of Cassie L. Chadwick, Bankrupt. Argued April 13 and 14, 1908. Decided April 27, 1908. General Order XXXVI. Mr. John C. Ha
Central Railroad v. Jersey City
CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY v. JERSEY CITY. ERROR TO THE COURT OP ERRORS AND APPEALS OP THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY. No. 203. Argued April 15, 16, 1908. Decided April 27, 1908. “Jurisdiction” as generally used in compacts between Sta
Lang v. New Jersey
LANG v. NEW JERSEY. ERROR TO THE COURT OF ERRORS AND APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY. No. 649. Argued April 6, 1908. Decided April 27, 1908. It is within the power of the State to divide accused persons into two classes, those who are, a
Bogard v. Sweet
BOGARD v. SWEET. APPEAL. FROM THE SUPREME COURT -OF’THE TERRITORY' OF OKLAHOMA. No. 156. Submitted March 6, 1808. Decided April 27, 1908. A.decree of Supreme Court of Oklahoma Cancelling a deed given to defendant below in furtherance óf a s
New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. Steamship Werdenfels
No. 693. The New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Company, Petitioner, v. The Steamship Werdenfels, etc. April 20, 1908. Mr. James J. Macklin and Mr. LaBoy S. Gove for petitioner. Mr. Charles C. Burlingham for respondent.
In re Moore
MATTER OF ALBERT N. MOORE, AN INFANT PETITIONER. PETITION FOE WEIT OF MANDAMUS. No. 17, Original. Argued March 9, 1908. Decided April 20, 1908. In either case, the filing by the defendant of a petition for removal, the filing by the plainti
Liu Hop Fong v. United States
LIU HOP FONG v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES' FOR THE • DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. No. 181. Argued March 18, 1908. Decided April 20, 1908. Under the provisions of § 13 of the act of September 13,1888, c. 1015,
United States v. Chandler-Dunbar Water Power Co.
UNITED STATES v. CHANDLER-DUNBAR WATER POWER COMPANY. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 599. Argued April 6, 7, 8, 1908. Decided April 20, 1908. Statutes of limitations with regard to land affect the right
Ex parte Nebraska
Ex parte THE STATE OF NEBRASKA. PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS. No. 15, Original. Argued March 17, 1908. Decided April 20, 1908. Mandamus will not lie to correct the decision of the Circuit Court that a party to the record — in this case a S
Pacific Express Co. v. Needham
No. 239. The Pacific Express Company et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. M. W. Needham. April 15, 1908. Mr. J. M. McCormick for plaintiffs in error. No appearance for defendant in error.
Robert Dollar v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance
No. 685. Robert Dollar et al., Petitioners, v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company et al. April 13, 1908. Mr. Charles Page, Mr. Edward J. McCutchen and Mr. Samuel Knight for petitioners. -Mr. Walter H. Robinson for.respondents.
Shawnee Compress Co. v. Anderson
SHAWNEE COMPRESS COMPANY v. ANDERSON. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF OKLAHOMA. No. 140. Argued March 2, 3, 1908. Decided April 13, 1908. Where the Supreme Court of the Territory of Oklahoma reverses the judgment of the tr
Woodward v. Davidson
No. 669. J. T. Woodward, Petitioner, v. James D. Davidson et al. April 6, 1908. Mr. George R. Peck, Mr. H. H. Field and Mr. E. C. Hughes for petitioner. Mr. Edward Brady for respondents.
In re Crarchilo
No. —, Original. Ex parte: In the Matter of Michael Crarchilo, Petitioner. Submitted March 9, 1908. Decided April 6, 1908. Mr. James K. Jones and Mr. William J. Stone for petitioner.
Stickney v. Kelsey
STICKNEY v. KELSEY, COMPTROLLER OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. ERROR TO THE SURROGATES’ COURT IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF NEW YORK, STATE OF NEW YORK. ' No. 196. Submitted March 20, 1908. Decided April 6, 1908. A ruling by the highest court of the
Longyear v. Toolan
LONGYEAR v. TOOLAN. ERROR TO THE SUPREME'COURT OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN. No. 177. Argued March 13, 1908. Decided April 6, 1908. An owner of property must be held to knowledge that failure to pay duly assessed taxes will be followed by sale;
Ware & Leland v. Mobile County
WARE AND LELAND v. MOBILE COUNTY. WARE AND LELAND v. STATE OF ALABAMA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALABAMA. Nos. 173, 174. Submitted March 10, 1908. Decided April 6, 1908. Contracts for sales of cotton for future delivery, -w
Beadles v. Smyser
BEADLES v. SMYSER, MAYOR OF THE CITY OF PERRY, OKLAHOMA. ERROR TO AND APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COTJRT OF THE TERRITORY OF OKLAHOMA. No. 150. Argued March 4, 1908. Decided April 6, 1908. While this court cannot review judgments of the Supreme
Thomas v. Taggart
THOMAS v. TAGGART. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 197. Argued January 17, 20, 1908. Decided April 6, 1908. Richardson v. Shaw, ante, p. 365, followed to the effect that as a general rale the broker is
Richardson v. Shaw
RICHARDSON, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY, v. SHAW. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 122. Argued January 17, 20,1908. Decided April 6, 1908. While a broker who carries stocks for a customer on margin may not be
Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad v. City of Vicksburg
THE YAZOO AND MISSISSIPPI VALLEY RAILROAD COMPANY v. CITY OF VICKSBURG. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI. No. 97. Argued February 28, 1908. Decided April 6, 1908. A corporation form
Hudson County Water Co. v. McCarter
HUDSON COUNTY WATER COMPANY v. McCARTER, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY. ERROR TO THE COURT OF ERRORS AND APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY. No. 184. Argued March 18, 19, 1908. Decided April 6, 1908. The boundary line between
Thompson v. Kentucky
THOMPSON v. COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY. ERROR TO THE COURT OP APPEALS OP THE STATE OP KENTUCKY. No. 160. Argued March 9, 1908. Decided April 6, 1908. Due process of law does not assure to taxpayers that the court will sustain the interpretati
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.