Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1909 Cases
264 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Notley v. Brown
NOTLEY v. BROWN. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE TERRITORY OP HAWAII. No. 361. Motion to dismiss or affirm. Submitted January 25, 1909. Decided February 1, 1909. Writ of error dismissed for want of jurisdiction, it appearing that the meri
In re Dowagiac Manufacturing Co.
In re DOWAGIAC MANUFACTURING CO. Submitted January 25, 1909. Decided February 1, 1909. Petition for leave to file petition for mandamus tp the Circuit Court of Appeals directing it to reinstate an appeal from the Circuit Court which had alr
Valdes v. Munich
VALDES v. MUNICH. SAME v. WOOD. SAME v. PERIANES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR PORTO RICO. Nos. 457, 473, 474. Motions to dismiss or affirm. Submitted January 18, 1909. Decided February 1, 1909. Writs of error to the
United States v. Marvin
UNITED STATES v. MARVIN. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 436. Submitted January 7, 1909. Decided February 1, 1909. The bankruptcy court of the United: States is always open for the transaction of business whether the judge be personall
Continental Wall Paper Co. v. Louis Voight & Sons Co.
CONTINENTAL WALL PAPER COMPANY v. LOUIS VOIGHT AND SONS COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 15. Argued April 24, 27, 1908. Decided February 1, 1909. Where a number of manufacturers si
Standard Oil Co. v. Anderson
THE STANDARD OIL COMPANY v. ANDERSON. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 58. Argued January 7, 1909. Decided February 1, 1909. One in the general service of another may be so transferred to
Spreckels v. Brown
SPRECKELS v. BROWN. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF HAWAII. No. 61. Submitted December 11, 1908. Decided February 1, 1909. Although the Supreme Court of Hawaii has not authority to enter a final judgment which is reviewable b
Crawford v. United States
CRAWFORD v. UNITED STATES. CERTIORARI TO .THE COURT OP APPEALS OP THE DISTRICT OP COLUMBIA. No. 92. Argued October 13, 14, 1908. Decided February 1, 1909. An agreement by an official of the United States under which he secretly receives any
Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Deselms
WATERS-PIERCE OIL COMPANY v. DESELMS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF OKLAHOMA. No. 62. Argued January 8, 1909. Decided February 1, 1909. In the construction of a statute a superfluous negative may be omitted where the meanin
Ontario Land Co. v. Yordy
ONTARIO LAND COMPANY v. YORDY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP WASHINGTON. No. 59. Argued January 7, 1909. Decided February 1, 1909. Although a description may not be technically correct, if it identifies the land it will' sustai
Converse v. Minnesota Thresher Mfg. Co.
CONVERSE v. MINNESOTA THRESHER MFG. CO. SAME v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF SUFFIELD. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ERRORS OF CONNECTICUT. Nos. 75, 76. Argued January 14, 1909. Decided January 25, 1909. A judgment of the highest court of Connect
Freshman v. United States
FRESHMAN v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COUfiT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. No. 298. Motion to dismiss or affirm. Submitted January 10, 1909. Decided January 25, 1909. Writ of error to review a judgment
Spokane Valley Land & Water Co. v. Madson
SPOKANE VALLEY LAND & WATER COMPANY v. MADSON. SAME v. SAME. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON.' Nos. 202, 231. Motion to dismiss. Submitted Januaiy 18, 1909. Decided January 25, 1909. Writs of error to review judgments
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Central Stock Yards Co.
LOUISVILLE AND NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY v. CENTRAL STOCK YARDS COMPANY. ERROR TO THE COURT OP APPEALS OF THE STATE OP KENTUCKY.. No. 51. Argued December 10, 11, 1908. Decided January 25, 1909. A provision in the constitution of a State th
Babcock v. DeMott
No. 659. George E. Babcock et al., Petitioners, v. Anna M. DeMott et al. January 18, 1909.
Palmer v. Texas
PALMER v. STATE OF TEXAS AND ECKHARDT, RECEIVER OF THE WATERS-PIERCE OIL COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 224. Arglied April 8, 9, 1908. Decided January 18, 1909. As the Federal an
Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas
WATERS-PIERCE OIL COMPANY v. STATE OF TEXAS (NO. 2). ERROR TO THE COURT OP CIVIL APPEALS POR THE THIRD SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT OP THE STATE OP TEXAS. No. 360. Argued November 2, 3, 1908. Decided January 18, 1909. ' The review of a judgmen
Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas
WATERS-PIERCE OIL COMPANY v. STATE OF TEXAS (NO. 1). ERROR TO THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS FOR THE THIRD SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF TEXAS. No. 359. Argued November 2, 3, 1908. Decided January 18, 1909. The jurisdiction of this
Moyer v. Peabody
MOYER v. PEABODY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO. No. 55. Argued January 5, 6, 1909. Decided January 18, 1909. What is due process of law depends on circumstances, and varies with the subject-ma
Presidio County v. Noel-Young Bond & Stock Co.
PRESIDIO COUNTY, TEXAS, v. THE NOEL-YOUNG BOND & STOCK COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. ' No. 41. Argued December 4, 1908. Decided January 18, 1909. • Where the officers having statuto
Rakes v. United States
RAKES v. UNITED STATES. error to the district court of the united states for the WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. No. 257. Argued January 4, 1909. Decided January 18, 1909. Jurisdiction of this court to review judgments of conviction in crimin
Schodde v. Twin Falls Land & Water Co.
No. 583. Henry Schodde, Petitioner, v. Twin Falls Land & Water Company. January 11, 1909.
Clay Center Electric Light & Power Co. v. City of Clay Center
CLAY CENTER ELECTRIC LIGHT & POWER CO. v. CITY OF CLAY CENTER. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 630. Motion to dismiss. Submitted January 4, 1909. Decided January 11, 1909. .Writ of error to review a judgment of the st
Morgan v. Adams
MORGAN v. ADAMS. EBKOB TO THE COURT OP APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 50. Argued December 9, 10, 1908. Decided January 11, 1909. Although the estate may amount to more than $5,000, if the aggregate interest of plaintiffs in error
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.