Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1909 Cases
264 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
United States v. Evans
UNITED STATES v. EVANS. CERTIORARI TO'THE COURT OP APPEALS OP THE DISTRICT OP COLUMBIA. No. 394. Submitted December 18, 1908. Decided April 19, 1909. Under § 935 of the Code of the District of- Columbia, act of March 3, 1901, c. 854, 31 Sta
Corn Products Refining Co. v. Harding
No. 773. Corn Products Refining Company, Petitioner, v. George F. Harding et al. April 12, 1909. Mr. Levy Mayer and Mr. John B. Daish for petitioner. Mr. George F. Harding for respondents.
Heckendorn v. United States
No. 763. John B. Heckendorn, Petitioner, v. The United States. April 12, 1909. Mr. Event Brown and Mr. H. J. Coolcinham iov petitioner. The Attorney General and The.:, Solicitor General for respondent.
In re Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.
MATTER OF CONSOLIDATED RUBBER TIRE COMPANY, PETITIONER. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION. Original. Submitted April 5, 1909. Decided April 12, 1909. Leave to file petition for writ of prohibition to prohibit the Uni
Macfadden v. United States
MACFADDEN v. UNITED STATES. APPLICATION POR WRIT OP ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 14 Original. Submitted April 5, 1909. Decided April 12, 1909. ■ The object of the act of March 3, 1891, c. 517,26 Stat. 826
Alvarez v. de Almeda
No. 147. Emeterio Alvarez, Potencia Mariano et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Severina Lerma Martinez de Almeda. In error to the Supreme Court of the Philippine Islands. April 8, 1909. Mr. John M. Thurston for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Marion
Boise Artesian Hot & Cold Water Co. v. Boise City
BOISE ARTESIAN HOT AND COLD WATER COMPANY v. BOISE CITY. APPEAL FEOM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO. No. 131. Argued March 17, 1909. Decided April 5, 1909. Equity will not interpose where there is a remedy
Maiorano v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad
MAIORANO v. BALTIMORE AND OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 103. Argued March 5, 8, 1909. Decided April 5, 1909. The construction of a state statute by the highest' court of the State must b
Turner v. American Security & Trust Co.
TURNER v. AMERICAN SECURITY AND TRUST COMPANY. APPEAL FROM AND IN ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 101. Argued March 9, 10, 1909. Decided April 5, 1909. Where the issue is whether a person is of sound or unsoun
Commercial Mutual Accident Co. v. Davis
COMMERCIAL MUTUAL ACCIDENT COMPANY v. DAVIS. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OP MISSOURI. No. 114. Argued March 15, 16, 1909. Decided April 5, 1909. Where the defendant makes no appearance in the sta
Coder v. Arts
CODER, TRUSTEE OF ARMSTRONG, BANKRUPT, v. ARTS. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 93. Argued January 26, 1909. Decided April 5, 1909. Where a creditor presents a claim to the trustee joined with a statemen
Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. McCabe
CHESAPEAKE AND OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY v. MCCABE, ADMINISTRATRIX. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KENTUCKY. No. 89. Argued January 25, 1909. Decided April 5, 1909. Where the case goes more than once to the highest court of the St
Selliger v. Kentucky ex rel. Alexander
SELLIGER v. COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, BY ALEXANDER, REVENUE AGENT. ERROR TO THE COURT OE APPEALS OP THE STATE OP KENTUCKY. No. 115. Argued March 16, 17, 1909. Decided April 5, 1909. Where there is nothing in the record on which to base them
Siler v. Illinois Central Railroad
SILER et al., AS RAILROAD COMMISSION, v. ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY. SAME v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY IN KENTUCKY. SAME v. CINCINNATI, NEW ORLEANS AND TEXAS PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Siler v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad
SILER et. al., CONSTITUTING THE RAILROAD COMMISSION OF KENTUCKY, v. LOUISVILLE AND NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF-THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY. No. 521. Argued February 24, 25, 26, 190
Murray v. South Carolina ex rel. Ray
MURRAY, McSWEEN, AND PATTON, AS THE STATE DISPENSARY COMMISSION, v. STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ex rel. RAY, TRUSTEE. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA. No. 605. Argued February 26, March 1, 1909. Decided April 5, 1909.
Murray v. Wilson Distilling Co.
MURRAY, McSWEEN, AND PATTON, CONSTITUTING THE STATE DISPENSARY COMMISSION OF SOUTH CAROLINA, v. WILSON DISTILLING COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 625. Argued February 26, March 1, 1909. Decide
Keller v. United States
KELLER v. UNITED STATES. ULLMAN v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OP ILLINOIS. Nos. 653, 654. Argued March 1, 1909. Decided April 5, 1909. Speaking generally, the police power is re
Keerl v. Montana
KEERL v. STATE OF MONTANA. EEROE TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA. No. 113. Argued March 15, 1909. Decided April 5, 1909. Where the accused during the trial specifically claims that the action of the state court in denying his p
Hurley v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.
HURLEY, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY OF THE ESTATE OF THE MOUNT CARMEL COAL COMPANY, BANKRUPT, APPELLANTS, v. THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 95. Argued Januar
United States v. Mason
UNITED STATES v. MASON. ERROR to the district court of the united states for the DISTRICT OF COLORADO. No. 642. Argued March 5, 1909. Decided April 5, 1909. On an appeal taken in a criminal case by the United States under the act of March 2
Hepner v. United States
HEPNER v. UNITED STATES. CERTIFICATE PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 626. Argued March 2, 1909. Decided April 5, 1909. A penalty may be recovered by a civil action, although such an action may be so far crimina
United States v. Dickinson
UNITED STATES v. DICKINSON. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE FIRST circuit; No. 362. Argued January 4, 6, 1909. Decided April 5, 1909. The writ of certiorari cannot be granted under the act of March 3,1891, c. 517, 26 Stat
Bonner v. Gorman
BONNER v. GORMAN, ADMINISTRATOR. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF. THE STATE OF ARKANSAS. No. 102. Submitted February 23, 1909. Decided April 5, 1909. When parties have, been fully heard in the regular course of judicial proceedings an erroneo
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.