Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1910 Cases
268 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Central Trust Co. v. Central Trust Co.
CENTRAL TRUST COMPANY v. CENTRAL TRUST COMPANY OF ILLINOIS. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT.' No. 86. Argued January 18, 1910. Decided February 21, 1910. The management of the post office business has been p
Ballinger v. United States ex rel. Frost
BALLINGER, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, v. UNITED STATES EX REL. FROST. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 64. Argued December 8, 1909. Decided February 21, 1910. The power of supervision and correction vested in
Chicago Great Western Railway Co. v. Minnesota
CHICAGO GREAT WESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. STATE OF MINNESOTA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OP MINNESOTA. No. 377. Argued November 8, 1909. Decided February 21, 1910. On the authority of Great Northern 'Railway Company v. Minnesota
Great Northern Railway Co. v. Minnesota
GREAT NORTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. STATE OF MINNESOTA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. No. 369. Argued November 5, 8, 1909. Decided February 21, 1910. A state legislature, unless restrained by the constitution of the St
Citizens' Central National Bank v. Appleton
CITIZENS’ CENTRAL NATIONAL BANK OF NEW YORK v. APPLETON, RECEIVER OF THE COOPER EXCHANGE BANK. ERROR TO THE. SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. No. 113. Argued January 27, 28, 1910. Decided February 21, 1910. Although a contract, made
President of the Monongahela Bridge Co. v. United States
PRESIDENT, MANAGERS, AND COMPANY OF THE MONONGAHELA BRIDGE COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR TIIE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 91. Argued January 19, 1910. Decided February 21, 1910. Con
Sanchez v. United States
ALVAREZ Y SANCHEZ v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 69. Submitted January 11, 1910. Decided February 21, 1910. The rights of private individuals recognized and protected by the Treaty of 1898 with Spain did not include
Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Andrews
WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH COMPANY v. ANDREWS. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS. ' No. 8. Argued April 13, 14, 1909. Decided February 21, 1910. Individuals, who, as officers of the State,
Ludwig v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
LUDWIG, SECRETARY OF STATE OF ARKANSAS, v. WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS. No. 45. Argued April 18, 14, 1909. Decided February 21, 1910. On the author
Childers v. McClaughry
CHILDERS v. McCLAUGHRY, WARDEN OF THE UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY AT LEAVENWORTH. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS. No. 110. Submitted January 26, 1910. Decided February 21, 1910. Where habeas co
Zartman v. First National Bank
ZARTMAN, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY, v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF WATERLOO. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OF NEW YORK. No. 74. Argued January 12, 1910. Decided February 21, 1910. The jurisdiction which equity has to-decree correction of e
Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Mazursky
ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY v. MAZURSKY. SOUTHERN EXPRESS COMPANY v. McTEER. ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY v. CHARLES. SAME v. VON LEHE. SAME v. SAME. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA. Nos. 58, 59, 6
Woodside v. Beckham
WOODSIDE v. BECKHAM. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA. No. 56. Argued December 9, 1909. Decided February 21, 1910. Where a plaintiff sues as assignee of several claims, but is not in fact the
Elkus
ELKUS, PETITIONER. (IN THE MATTER OF THE MADSON STEELE COMPANY, BANKRUPT.) CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT-OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 238. Argued November 29, 1909. Decided February 21, 1910. On the authority of Babbiil v. Du
Babbitt v. Dutcher
BABBITT, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY, v. DUTCHER. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF. THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 39. Argued November 29, 1909. Decided February 21, 1910. Corporate records and stock-books of a corp
Blake v. Openhym
BLAKE, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY, v. OPENHYM. API-'EAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FO.R THE ' EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 71. Submitted January 11, 1910. Decided February 12, 1910. The judgment in this case that the vendor of goods sold to the ba
King v. West Virginia
KING v. STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA AND SPRUCE COAL AND LUMBER COMPANY. SAME v. SAME AND MILLS. SAME v. SAME AND BUSKIRK. ERROR. TO THE SUPREME COURT OP APPEALS OP THE STATE OP WEST VIRGINIA. Nos. 445, 446, 447. Argued December 14, 15, 16, 1909.
Conley v. Ballinger
CONLEY v. BALLINGER, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR. APPICAL FROM Til 10 CIliClUT COURT OP Till' UNITED STATES EOR THE DISTRICT OE KANSAS. No. 77. Argued January 14, 1910. Decided January 31, 1910. Tlicrc is no ((ue.sl.ion as to the complete leg
Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway v. Slade
CINCINNATI, NEW ORLEANS AND TEXAS PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. J. SLADE AND E. M. PLESS. ERROR TO THE COURT OP APPEALS OP THE STATE OF GEORGIA. No. 79. Argued January 14, 1910. Decided January 31, 1910. Where the state court decides that, und
Pullman Co. v. Kansas ex rel. Coleman
PULLMAN COMPANY v. STATE OF KANSAS EX REL. COLEMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 5. Argued March 17, 18, 1909. Decided January 31, 1910. The judgment of the court below reversed on the authority o
Commissioners of Lincoln Park v. Westrumite Co. of America
No. 733. The Commissioners of Lincoln Park, Petitioner, v. Westrumite Company of America. January 31, 1910. Mr. William R. Rummler and Mr. Eugene C. Mason for petitioner. Mr. Walter H. Chamberlin for respondent.
United States v. Terminal Railroad
UNITED STATES v. TERMINAL RAILROAD ASSOCIATION OF ST. LOUIS. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN'DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. No. 597. Motion to dismiss submitted January 31, 1910. Decided January 31, 1910. A ce
Stanclift v. Fox
No. 109. T. M. Stanclift et al., etc., Appellants, v. Charlie Fox et al. January 24, 1910. Mr. William T. Hutchings for appellant. Mr. Preston C. West for appellees.
Dyer v. City of Melrose
DYER v. CITY OF MELROSE. ERROR TO THE SUPERIOR COURT OP THE STATE OE MASSACHUSETTS. No. 93. Argued January 20, 1910. Decided January 24, 1910. A judgment of the state court sustaining a tax on property of an officer of the United States Nav
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.