Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1910 Cases
268 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Mallers v. Commercial Loan & Trust Co.
MALLERS v. COMMERCIAL LOAN & TRUST COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP ILLINOIS. No. 726. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted February 28, 1910. Decided March 14, 1910. Where no Federal question is raised in the state cour
Lewis v. United States
LEWIS v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. No. 202. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted February 28, 1910. Decided March 14, 1910. One cannot complain until he is made to
Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. North Dakota ex rel. McCue
NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA EX REL. McCUE, ATTORNEY GENERAL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OP NORTH DAKOTA. No. 553. Argued February 24, 25, 1010. Decided March 14, 1910. Willcox v. Consolidated Gas C
Osborn v. Froyseth
OSBORN ET AL., TRUSTEES OF THE HASTINGS AND DAKOTA RAILWAY CO. v. FROYSETH. ERROR TO TIIE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP MINNESOTA. No. 395. Submitted January 5, 1910. Decided March 14, 1910. A rejection of a homestead entry on the ground th
Franklin v. United States
FRANKLIN v. UNITED STATES. TjyR.TÍ.OT?. TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OP NEW YORK. No. 736. Submitted February 21, 1910. Decided March 14, 1910. The sixty-second article of war does not vest, nor purpor
Helvetia Swiss Fire Insurance v. Brandenstein
No. 817. Helvetia Swiss Fire Insurance Company, Petitioner, v. Max J. Brandenstein et al. March 7, 1910. Mr. William J. Wallace and Mr. Frederick B. Campbell for the petitioner. Mr. William V. Rowe and Mr. Royall Victor fo'r the respondents
David Kaufman & Sons Co. v. Smith
DAVID KAUFMAN & SONS COMPANY v. SMITH, COLLECTOR OF THE PORT OF NEWARK, NEW JERSEY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. No. 668. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted February 28, 1910. Decided Ma
Shine v. Fox Bros. Manufacturing Co.
SHINE v. FOX BROTHERS MANUFACTURING COMPANY. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATICS FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. No. 383. Motion to dismiss submitted February 21, 1910. Decided March 7, 1910. A direct appeal from the C
Moore v. United States ex rel. Newcomb Motor Co.
MOORE, COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS, v. UNITED STATES EX REL. NEWCOMB MOTOR COMPANY. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF, COLUMBIA. No. 115. Argued March 1, 2, 1910. Decided March 7, 1910. A writ of error to the Court of Appeals of
Knapp v. Milwaukee Trust Co.
KNAPP v. MILWAUKEE TRUST COMPANY, TRUSTEE OF THE ESTATE OF STANDARD TELEPHONE & ELECTRIC COMPANY, BANKRUPT. APPEAL FROM THE1 CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 206. Submitted January 10, 1910. Decided March 7, 1910. An in
Interstate Commece Commission v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.
INTERSTATE COMMECE COMMISSION v. NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. No. 570. Argued February 23, 24, 1910. Decided March 7, 1910. Under § 4 of the act of June
Interstate Commerce Commission v. Delaware
INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION v. DELAWARE, LACKAWANNA AND WESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THU CIRCUIT COURT OK THE UNITED STATES EOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 362. Argued February 21, 23, 1910. Decided March 7, 1910. Whe
United States v. Haug
No. 405. The United States v. Anton Hansen Haug. February 28, 1910. Certificate dismissed on motion of Mr. Solicitor (¡eneral Bowers for the
General Electric Co. v. Richmond Street & Interurban Railway Co.
No. 780. General Electric Company, Petitioner, v. The Richmond Street & Interurban Railway Company. February 28, 1910. Mr. L., F. H. Betts for the petitioner. Mr. Thomas F. Sheridan'asid Mr. Clifton.B. Edwards for the respondent.
Orgain v. Martin
No. 743. Eugene M. Orgain, Trustee, etc., Petitioner, v. Julia Martin. February 28, 1910. Mr. Charles K. Bell for the petitioner. Mr. Walter Lyon for the respondent.
Weir v. Rountree
WEIR v. ROUNTREE. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 769. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted February 21, 1910. Decided February 28, 1910. Where the Circuit Court would not have had jurisdi
Hudson Oil & Supply Co. v. Booraem
HUDSON OIL & SUPPLY COMPANY v. BOORAEM, RECEIVER, ETC. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. No. 568. Ordered advanced and submitted February 28, 1910. Decided February 28, 1910. An appeal taken sol
Withnell v. William R. Bush Construction Co.
WITHNELL v. WILLIAM R. BUSH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY. APPEAL' FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR . . THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. No. 108. Argued January 26, 1910. Decided February 28, 1910. A decree of the Circuit Court susta
Starkweather v. Jenner
STARKWEATHER v. JENNER. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF Columbia. No. 114. Argued January 28, 1910. Decided February 28, 1910. In this case the charges of fraud and collusion on the part of the defendants are wholly unsu
Board of Assessors of the Parish v. New York Life Insurance
BOARD OF ASSESSORS OF THE PARISH OF ORLEANS, THE CITY OF NEW ORLEANS, v. NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE EASTERN-DISTRICT OP LOUISIANA. No. 112. Argued January 27, 1910. Decided Fe
J. J. McCaskill Co v. United States
J. J. McCASKILL COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE PIPTH CIRCUIT. No. 103. Argued January 25, 1910. Decided February 28, 1910. In this case it was held that the averments set forth in the bill of frau
William Cramp & Sons Ship & Engine Building Co. v. United States
WILLIAM CRAMP AND SONS SHIP AND ENGINE BUILDING COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL’FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 92. Argued January 19, 20, 1910. Decided February 28, 1910. Executive officers are not authorized to entertain and settle claims
Maryland v. West Virginia
STATE OF MARYLAND v. STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA. IN EQUITY. No. 1, Original. Argued November 2, 3, 4, 1909. Decided February 21, 1910. The record in this case sustains the proposition that for many yeáfs the people of Maryland, Virginia and Wes
American Car & Foundry Co. v. Seeger Refrigerator Co.
No. 738. American Car & Foundry Company, Petitioner, v. Seeger Refrigerator Company. February 21, 1910. Mr. Samuel-R\ Betts, Mr. Paul Bakewell, and Mr. C. A. Severance for the petitioner. Mr. 'Edmund, Wetmore and Mr. O. W. Jeffery for' the
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.