Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1910 Cases
268 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Portland Railway, Light & Power Co. v. City of Portland
No. 176. Portland Railway, Light & Power Company et al., Appellants, v. The City of Portland et al. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Oregon. October 11, 1910. Mr. Frederick V. Holman for appellants. No
Cartwright v. Holcomb
No. 97. Mary E. Cartwright, Plaintiff in Error, v. I. M. Holcomb, Administrator of the Estate of D. J. Spencer, Deceased, et al. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Oklahoma. October 11, 1910. Mr. Marshall Fulton for plaintiff in
United States v. Duncan
No. 355. The United States, Plaintiff in Error, v. William A. Duncan. In error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Colorado. October 11, 1910. The Attorney General for plaintiff in error. Mr. Edwin H. Park for def
United States v. Durie
No. 292. The United States, Plaintiff in Error, v. James Durie. In error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. October 11, 1910. The Attorney General for plaintiff in error. Mr. Francis S. Laws
Stubblefield v. Stubblefield
No. 185. Thomas W. Stubblefield, Appellant, v. Lee A. Stubblefield et al. Appeal from the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia. July 28, 1910. Mr. James S. Easby-Smith and Mr. Howard Boyd for appellant. Mr. A.E.L. Leckie and Mr. Jos
Hertz v. Woodman
HERTZ, COLLECTOR, v. WOODMAN. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 640. Argued April 25, 20, 1910. Decided May 31, 1910. Where, as in this case, the certificate sufficiently states both the question and
City of Omaha v. Omaha Water Co.
CITY OF OMAHA v. OMAHA WATER COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 159. Argued April 19, 1910. Decided May 31, 1910. In the absence of any provision in the submission, the award of arbitrators or ap
Watson v. Maryland
WATSON v. STATE OF MARYLAND. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND. No. 174. Argued April 27, 1910. Decided May 31, 1910. The decision of the state court that an offense under a statute did not depend on conditions as to no
Franklin v. South Carolina
FRANKLIN v. STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA. No. 164. Argued April 20, 21, 1910. Decided May 31, 1910. On writ of error to review a judgment of conviction of the state court this court, has
Roach v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.
ROACH, SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI, v. ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. No. 151. Argued April 14, 1910. Decided May 31, 1
Herndon v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.
HERNDON, PROSECUTING ATTORNEY OF CLINTON COUNTY, MISSOURI, AND SWANGER, [ROACH] SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI, v. CHICAGO, ROCK ISLAND AND PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WES
Thomas v. Sugarman
THOMAS, AS TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY OF LIGHTSTONE, v. SUGARMAN. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 131. Argued April 12, 1910. Decided May 31, 1910. Where the trustee in bankruptcy brings a bill in equity in t
Dozier v. Alabama
DOZIER v. STATE OF ALABAMA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALABAMA. No. 105. Submitted January 25, 1910. Decided May 31, 1910. The protection of the commerce clause of, the Federal Constitution extends beyond the strict' lines o
In re Cleland
IN RE HENRY A. CLELAND, PETITIONER. MANDAMUS. No. 12, Original. Argued April 4, 1910. Decided May 31, 1910. Where the circuit judge certifies that he is satisfied that the suit involves a controversy within the jurisdiction of the Circuit C
Interstate Commerce Commission v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad
INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION v. CHICAGO, BURLINGTON AND QUINCY RAILROAD COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 641. Argued April 5, 6, 1910. Decided May 31, 1910. This case i
Interstate Commerce Commission v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.
INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION v. CHICAGO, ROCK ISLAND & PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY. BURNHAM, HANNA, MUNGER DRY GOODS COMPANY v. SAME. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. Nos. 663, 664. Ar
Standard Oil Co. v. Brown
STANDARD OIL COMPANY v. BROWN. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 168. Argued April 22, 25, 1910. Decided May 31, 1910. While the pleadings and proofs should correspond, a rigid exactitude is not required, and no
Chiles v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.
CHILES v. CHESAPEAKE AND OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KENTUCKY. No. 158. Argued April 18, 1910. Decided May 31, 1910. As held by the Court of Appeals of Kentucky, a railroad company has the right, in t
Shevlin-Carpenter Co. v. Minnesota
SHEVLIN-CARPENTER COMPANY v. STATE OF MINNESOTA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. No. 139. Argued April 6, 1910. Decided May 31, 1910. Where the purpose of a state statute does not depend upon the in-separableness of it
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Melton
LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY v. MELTON. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KENTUCKY. No. 180. Argued April 28, 29, 1910. Decided May 31, 1910. When a Federal question does exist .the writ of error will not be dismissed
Rankin v. Emigh
RANKIN, RECEIVER OF THE BERLIN NATIONAL BANK, v. EMIGH. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WISCONSIN. No. 144. Argued April 15, 18, 1910. Decided May 31, 1910. On error to a state court of last resort in a case involying the liabili
Sistare v. Sistare
SISTARE v. SISTARE. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ERRORS OF THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT. No. 7. Argued November 1, 1909. Decided May 31, 1910. Past due installments of a judgment for future alimony rendered in one State are within the protecti
Harding v. Gillett
No. 910. Olive Ella Marilla Harding, Plaintiff in Error, v. Myrtle Gillett et al. May 31, 1910. Mr. J. C. Robberts and Mr. George W. Buckner for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Arthur A. Birney and Mr. Henry F. Woodard for. the defendants in er
Lehigh Valley Transportation Co. v. Monk
No. 940. Lehigh Valley Transportation Company, Claimant, etc., Petitioner, v. Thomas Monk, Jr., et al. May 31, 1910. Mr. Archibald G. Thacher for the petitioner. Mr. Herbert Green, Mr. Jarnés J. Mack-lin and Mr. de Lagnel Berier for the res
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.