Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1912 Cases
280 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Cuba Railroad v. Crosby
CUBA RAILROAD COMPANY v. CROSBY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 124. Argued December 18, 1911. — Decided January 9, 1912. In dealing with rudimentary contracts, or torts made or committed abroad, court
United States v. McMullen
UNITED STATES v. McMULLEN ET AL., ADMINISTRATORS. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 100. Argued December 13, 14, 1911. — Decided January 9, 1912. Under the provisions of the contract in this case for possible
Gandia v. Pettingill
GANDIA v. PETTINGILL. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR PORTO RICO. No. 97. Argued December 14, 1911. — Decided January 9, 1912. In the absence of express malice or excess, publication of actual facts is not libellous, an
Treat v. Grand Canyon Railway Co.
TREAT, TREASURER OF COCONINO COUNTY, ARIZONA, v. GRAND CANYON RAILWAY COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF ARIZONA. No. 86. Argued December 8, 11, 1911. — Decided January 9, 1912. Where it is inherently legal and prote
Southern Railway Co. v. Beam
SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. REID & BEAM. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. 80. Argued December 6, 1911. — Decided January 9, 1912. Southern Railway Co. v. Reid, ante, p. 424, followed to effect that legislation
Southern Railway Co. v. Reid
SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. REID. ERROR TO THE SUPREME* COURT OP THE STATE OP NORTH CAROLINA. No. 487. Argued December 6, 1911. — Decided January 9, 1912. There are three degrees to which the State exercises power over com- ■ merce. First e
Williams v. Walsh
WILLIAMS v. WALSH, SHERIFF OF CRAWFORD COUNTY, KANSAS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 79. Argued December 5, 1911. — Decided January 9, 1912. A classification as to time that is not arbitrary is not repugnant to the
Vogt v. Graff
VOGT v. GRAFF AND VOGT. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 73. Argued November 17, 1911. — Decided January 9, 1912. The rule in Shelley’s case is a rule of property in the District of Columbia, and the questio
Title Guaranty & Surety Co. v. United States ex rel. General Electric Co.
TITLE GUARANTY & SURETY COMPANY v. UNITED STATES, TO THE USE OF GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY. error to the circuit court of appeals for the third CIRCUIT. No. 856. Submitted November 20, 1911. — Decided January 9, 1912. Section 1007, Rev. Stat.
Aran v. Zurrinach
ARAN v. ZURRINACH. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF PORTO RICO. No. 146. Submitted December 22, 1911. — Decided January 9, 1912. Under the act of April 12, 1900, c. 191, 31 Stat. 85, this court cannot rev
Red "C" Oil Manufacturing Co. v. Board of Agriculture
RED “C” OIL MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. BOARD OF AGRICULTURE OF NORTH CAROLINA. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. 141. Argued December 21, 22, 1911. — Decided January 9, 1912. Th
Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Washington ex rel. Atkinson
NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY CO. v. STATE OF WASHINGTON EX REL. ATKINSON, ATTORNEY GENERAL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME 'COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. No. 136. Submitted December 19, 1911. — Decided January 9, 1912. A train moving and carrying fre
Gring v. Ives
GRING v. IVES. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. 115. Submitted December 18, 1911. — Decided January 9, 1912. The act of March 3,1899, c. 425, § 10, 30 Stat. 1121,1151, authorizing establishment of harbor lines
Rock Island Plow Co. v. Reardon
ROCK ISLAND PLOW COMPANY v. REARDON, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY OF BROWN. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 98. Submitted December 11, 1911. — Decided January 9, 1912. A bankrupt, in Illinois, within a few day
Berryman v. Board of Trustees of Whitman College
BERRYMAN v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF WHITMAN COLLEGE. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OP WASHINGTON. No. 95. Argued December 13, 1911. — Decided January 9, 1912. The amount in controversy where the qu
Brown v. Alton Water Co.
BROWN v. ALTON WATER COMPANY. APPEAL EBOM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF. ILLINOIS. No. 75. Argued December 4, 5, 1911. — Decided January 9, 1912. This court may not by indirection do that which it canno
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.