Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1912 Cases
280 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Skeele Coal Co. v. Arnold
No. 866. The Skeele Coal Company, Petitioner, v. Gohen C. Arnold, Trustee in Bankruptcy, etc. December 23, 1912. Mr. Nicholas W. Hacker for the petitioner. Mr. C. Andrade, Jr., for the respondent.
Zavelo v. Leichtman, Goodman & Co.
No. 300. B. Zavelo, Plaintiff in Error, v. Leichtman, Goodman & Company. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Alabama. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted December 16, 1912. Decided December 23, 1912. Mr. Oscar B. Hundley.for the
Williams v. City of Talladega
WILLIAMS v. CITY OF TALLADEGA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALABAMA. No. 44. Argued November 7, 8, 1912. Decided December 23, 1912. The privilege given telegraph companies under the hot of July 24, 1866, to use military and po
Keatley v. Furey
KEATLEY, AS RECEIVER OF AMERICAN GUARANTY COMPANY, v. FUREY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 84. Argued December 12, 1912. Decided December 23, 1912. In order to warrant a direct
Darnell v. Indiana
DARNELL, EXECUTOR, v. STATE OF INDIANA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF INDIANA. No. 78. Argued December 9, 1912. Decided December 23, 1912. The statutes of Indiana taxing all shares in foreign corporations except national banks
Wood v. A. Wilbert's Sons Shingle & Lumber Co.
WOOD, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY OF LECHE, v. A. WILBERT'S SONS SHINGLE AND LUMBER COMPANY AND WILBERT. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. No. 61. Argued December 5, 1912. Decided December
McLean v. United States
McLEAN, WIDOW OF NATHANIEL H. McLEAN, v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 33. Argued November 6, 1912. Decided December 23, 1912. Under the áct of Congress of February 24, 190.5, 33 Stat. 806, c. 777, directing the accoun
Cassidy v. Silver King Coalition Mines Co.
No. 839. Charlotte Cassidy, Petitioner, v. Silver King Coalition Mines Company. December 16, 1912. Mr. John A. Shelton for the petitioner. No appearance for the respondent.
Addison Ship-y-Tuck v. United States
No. 70. Addison Ship-y-Tuck, Plaintiff in Error, v. The United States. In error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Kansas. Submitted December 5, 1912. Decided December 16, 1912. Mr. F. T. Woodburn and Mr. A. E. C
United States v. Reading Co.
UNITED STATES v. READING COMPANY. TEMPLE IRON COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. READING COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. Nos. 198, 206, 217. Argued October 10, 1
Murray v. City of Pocatello
MURRAY, DOING BUSINESS AS THE POCATELLO WATER COMPANY, v. CITY OF POCATELLO. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO. No. 575. Argued December 3, 4, 1912. Decided December 16, 1912. This court is not prepared-on the facts in this c
Robertson v. Gordon
ROBERTSON v. GORDON, AND BUTLER AND VALE. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 56. Argued November 15, 1912. Decided December 16, 1912. A contract between attorneys for division of fees construed according to th
Florida ex rel. Wailes v. Croom
STATE OF FLORIDA ON THE RELATION OF WAILES v. CROOM, COMPTROLLER OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. No. 646. Submitted December 2, 1912. Decided December 16, 1912. Where it appears, although by evidence outside
Brown v. Powers
No. 95. Ed Brown et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Frank M. Powers, Judge, et al. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Iowa. December 13, 1912. Mr. Benjamin I. Salinger for the plaintiffs in error. No appearance for the defendants in
Cue v. Cotton
No. 88. Gaspar Cue et al., Appellants, v. William C. Cotton et al., Executors, etc., et al. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Texas. December 9, 1912. Mr. A. Seymour Thurmond for the appellants.
United States v. Union Stock Yard & Transit Co.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UPON THE APPLICATION OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, AT THE REQUEST OF THE INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION, v. UNION STOCK YARD & TRANSIT COMPANY OF CHICAGO. CHICAGO JUNCTION RAILWAY COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEALS FROM
Farmers & Mechanics' Bank of Vandalia v. Maines
No. 850. Farmers & Mechanics’ Bank of Vandalia, Ill., Petitioner, v. Harrison W. Maines. December 2, 1912. Mr. Bernard B. Selling for the petitioner. Mr. John C. Donnelly for the respondent.
Yuk Ping v. Steward
No. 375. Yuk Ping, Alias Lee So Mui, Appellant, v. Luther C. Steward and H. Edsell. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of California. Motion to affirm submitted November 18, 1912. Decided December 2
National Surety Co. v. Architectural Decorating Co.
NATIONAL SURETY COMPANY v. ARCHITECTURAL DECORATING COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. No. 425. Submitted October 28, 1912. Decided December 2, 1912. While, in a general sense, the laws in force at the time the c
Zakonaite v. Wolf
ZAKONAITE v. WOLF, JAILOR OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. No. 53. Argued November 14, 1912. Decided December 2, 1912. The evidence in this case, upon which
Rosenthal v. New York
ROSENTHAL v. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. ERROR TO THE COUNTY COURT OF MONROE COUNTY, IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK. No. 28 Argued November 5, 1912. Decided December 2, 1912. The prohibition of the Fourteenth Amendment against abridgment of
Beach v. United States
BEACH v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 7. Argued October 30, 1912. Decided December 2, 1912. Recitals by the Court of Claims of the documents upon which the claimant’s case alone can rest with a history of the transact
Veve v. Sanchez
VEVE v. SANCHEZ. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR PORTO RICO. No. 42. Argued November 7, 1912. Decided December 2, 1912. While a tract may. be so well known by. name that it can be described and conveyed without- other d
German Alliance Insurance v. Home Water Supply Co.
GERMAN ALLIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY v. HOME WATER SUPPLY COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 19. Argued April 26, 1912. Decided December 2, 1912. A municipality is not bound to furnish water for fir
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.