Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1912 Cases
280 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Diaz v. United States
DIAZ v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS. No. 384. Argued November 16, 1911. Decided February 19, 1912. The provision against double jeopardy in the Philippine Act of July 1, 1902,' 32 Stat. 691, c. 1369,
Reitler v. Harris
REITLER v. HARRIS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP KANSAS. No. 99. Submitted December 13, 1911. Decided February 19, 1912. A state statute which makes special entries in public records prima fade, but not conclusive, evidence, of
Ferris v. Frohman
FERRIS v. FROHMAN. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP ILLINOIS. No. 44. Submitted November 7, 1911. Decided February 19, 1912. Although complainant may assert his own common-law copyright to his play, if he alleges that defendant ha
United States v. Citroen
UNITED STATES v. CITROEN. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE . SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 30. Argued November 1, 1911. Decided February 19, 1912. In order to produce uniformity in the imposition of duties, the dutiable, classificat
City of Cincinnati v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad
CITY OF CINCINNATI v. LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD CO. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OHIO. No. 385. Submitted January 9, 1912. Decided February 19, 1912. After its admission into the Union, the legislative power of the State
Cuebas v. Cuebas
CUEBAS Y ARREDONDO v. CUEBAS Y ARREDONDO. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR PORTO RICO. No. 159. Submitted January 24, 1912. Decided February 19, 1912. Errors assignecL&s to finding of citizenship of a party dismissed
The San Pedro
THE SAN PEDRO. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES ' FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 155. Submitted December 22, 1911. Decided February 19, 1912. The manifest object of the fifty-fourth rule in admiralty cannot
Lincoln Gas & Electric Light Co. v. City of Lincoln
LINCOLN GAS AND ELECTRIC LIGHT CO. v. CITY OF LINCOLN. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE- DISTRICT 0£ NEBRASKA. No. 83. Argued December 6, 7, 1911. Decided February 19, 1912. Every legislative rate case, presents th
United States Express Co. v. Minnesota
UNITED STATES EXPRESS COMPANY v. MINNESOTA. ERROR ; TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ' MINNESOTA. . No. 708. Argued January 16, 17, 1912. Decided February 19, 1912. In determining whether a state tax on earnings is constitutional this c
Rocca v. Thompson
ROCCA v. THOMPSON. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. No. 292. Argued January 17, 18, 1912. Decided February 19, 1912. Instructions of the head of a Department must be read in light of the statute directly bearing on the
Powers v. United States
POWERS v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE- WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. No. 152. Argued January 22, 1912. Decided February 19, 1912. The objection that there was no venire facias summoning the grand
Meyer v. Wells, Fargo & Co.
MEYER, AUDITOR OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA, v. WELLS, FARGO & COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA. ' ' No. 624. Argued January 16, 1912. Decided February 19, 1912. In estimating for
Collins v. Texas
COLLINS v. THE STATE OF TEXAS. ERROR TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS. No. 165. Argued January 25, 26, 1912. Decided February 19, 1912. Where the party attacking the constitutionality of a statute has not suffered, the
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. O'Connor
ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY v. O’CONNOR. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO. No. 162. Argued January 24, 25, 1912. Decided February 19, 1912. One denying the legality .of a tax. shou
Ker & Co. v. Couden
KER AND COMPANY v. COUDEN. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS. No. 11. Argued January 27, 1912. Decided February 19, 1912. The question of ownership under the Spanish law of accessions to the shore by accretion and alluvio
Jacob v. Roberts
JACOB v. ROBERTS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE. OP CALIFORNIA. No. 169. Argued January 25, 1912. Decided February 19, 1912. While an essential element of due process of law is opportunity to be heard, a necessary condition of whi
New York Continental Jewell Filtration Co. v. District of Columbia
NEW YORK CONTINENTAL JEWELL FILTRATION COMPANY v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. ERROR to the court of appeals of the district of COLUMBIA. No. 145. Argued December 22, 1911. Decided February 19, 1912. The Union Station Act of February 28, 1903, 32
Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. McCue
NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. McCUE, ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 138. Argued December 20, 21, 1911. Decided February 19, 1912. The obligation of a contract depends upon the l
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Sandoval
UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY v. SANDOVAL. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY' OF ARIZONA. No. 125. Submitted December 18, 1911. Decided February 19, 1912. Payment by a surety company of the amount of a supersedeas
Fairbanks v. United States
FAIRBANKS v. UNITED STATES. WARREN v. UNITED STATES. APPEALS. PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. Nos. 112, 113. Argued January 18, 19, 1912. Decided February 19, 1912. The Nelson Act of January 14, 1889, 25 Stat. 642,
Jacobs v. Prichard
JACOBS v. PRICHARD, TRUSTEE. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. No. 93. Submitted December 8, 1911. Decided February 19, 1912. In allotting Indian lands, Congress can determine the conditions under which they shall be al
United States v. Baruch
UNITED STATES v. BARUCH. CERTIORARI TO THE CÍRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE' SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 190. Argued November 13, 14, 1911 Decided February 19, 1912. Cotton featherstitch braids are properly assessed at sixty per centum as braids un
Ætna Life Insurance v. Tremblay
ÆTNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. TREMBLAY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF THE STATE OF .MAINE. No. 166. Argued January 26, 1912. Decided February 19, 1912. The full faith and credit clause of the Constitution does not extend to judgme
Hendricks v. United States
HENDRICKS v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON. No. 164. Argued January 25, 1912. Decided February 19, 1912. The specification of the identity of á defendant and precise nature of his
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.