Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1914 Cases
315 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Order of St. Benedict v. Steinhauser
ORDER OF ST. BENEDICT OF NEW JERSEY v. STEINHAUSER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ADMINISTRATOR OF WIRTH. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 267. Argued March 11, 1914. Decided June 22, 1914. In a suit by an eccles
Malone v. Kentucky
MALONE v. COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY. ERROR TO THE COURT OP APPEALS OP THE STATE OP KENTUCKY. No. 36. Submitted April 22, 1914. Decided June 22, 1914. 141 Kentucky, 570, reversed on the authority of the preceding case. The facts are stated in
Collins v. Kentucky
COLLINS v. COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KENTUCKY. No. 35. Submitted April 22, 1914. Decided June 22, 1914. A state penal statute which prescribes no. standard of conduct that it is possible to know
Louisiana v. McAdoo
STATE OF LOUISIANA v. McADOO, SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY. MOTION ,FOK LEAVE TO FILE PETITION. Original. Argued April 14, 1914. Decided June 22, 1914. The United States may not be sued in the courts of this country without its consent. Whethe
Moore-Mansfield Construction Co. v. Electrical Installation Co.
MOORE-MANSFIELD CONSTRUCTION CO. v. ELECTRICAL INSTALLATION COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF INDIANA. No. 358. Argued May 5, 1914. Decided June 22, 1914. A case otherwise within the jurisdicti
Jones v. Jones
JONES v. JONES. error to the supreme court of the state of TENNESSEE. No. 339. Argued April 30, 1914. Decided June 22, 1914. The statute of Tennessee of 1865, c. 40, § 8, declaring that children of slave marriages should be legitimately ent
Eastern States Retail Lumber Dealers' Ass'n v. United States
EASTERN STATES RETAIL LUMBER DEALERS’ ASSOCIATION v. UNITED STATES. McBride, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PRESIDENT OF THE RETAIL LUMBERMEN’S ASSOCIATION OF PHILADELPHIA, v. THE UNITED STATES. APPEALS FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Higdon
LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY v. HIGDON, DOING BUSINESS UNDER THE NAME OF CRESCENT COAL COMPANY. ERROR TO THE COURT OP APPEALS OP THE STATE OP KENTUCKY. No. 322. Submitted March 19, 1914. Decided June 22, 1914. Attempts to inject
International Harvester Co. of America v. Kentucky
INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER COMPANY OF AMERICA v. COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY. ERROR -TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF ' KENTUCKY. No. 298. Argued April 24, 1914. Decided June 22, 1914. Where the state court has denied a motion to quash the
International Harvester Co. of America v. Kentucky
INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER COMPANY OF AMERICA v. COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY. ERROR TO THE COURT OP APPEALS OP THE STATE OP KENTUCKY. No. 297. Argued April 24, 1914. Decided June 22, 1914. It is essential to the rendition of a personal judgment a
Charleston & Western Carolina Railway Co. v. Thompson
CHARLESTON AND WESTERN CAROLINA RAILWAY COMPANY v. THOMPSON. ERROR TO THE COURT OP APPEALS OP THE STATE OP GEORGIA. No. 751. Argued April 15, 16, 1914. Decided June 22, 1914. Under the free pass provision of the Hepburn Act of June 29, 1906
Pipe Line Cases
THE PIPE LINE CASES. APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES COMMERCE COURT. Nos. 481, 482, 483, 506, 507, 508. Argued October 15, 16, 1913. Decided June 22, 1914. The provision in the Hepburn Act, amending the Act to Regulate Commerce by making per
Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Brown
WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH COMPANY v. BROWN. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP SOUTH CAROLINA. No. 355. Argued May 5, 1914. Decided June 22, 1914. A recovery in one jurisdiction for a tort committed in another must be based on the gro
Lane v. Watts
LANE, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, v. WATTS. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP APPEALS OP THE DISTRICT ' OP COLUMBIA. No. 889. Argued April 14, 15, 1914. Decided June 22, 1914. A title which has passed by location of a grant and its approval by proper
People ex rel. Dunne v. Economy Light & Power Co.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, ON THE RELATION OF DUNNE, GOVERNOR, AND LUCEY, ATTORNEY GENERAL, v. ECONOMY LIGHT AND POWER COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP ILLINOIS. No. 179. Argued April 29, 30, 1914. Decided June
United States v. Union Pacific Railroad
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION, ET AL., v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY ET AL. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION ET AL., v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY ET AL. APPEAL PROM THE UNI
Intermountain Rate Cases
INTERMOUNTAIN RATE CASES. APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES COMMERCE COURT. Nos. 136, 162. Argued October 18, 21, 22, 1912. Decided June 22, 1914. Prior to the amendment of June 18, 1910, § 4 of the Act to Regulate Commerce lodged in the carri
Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Larabee
MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. LARABEE. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 135. Argued December 15, 16, 1913. Decided June 22, 1914. A State cannot burden the right of access to this court, nor does the power of the
Equitable Surety Co. v. United States ex rel. McMillan
EQUITABLE SURETY COMPANY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, TO THE USE OF McMILLAN. CERTIFICATE FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 861. Argued April 15, 1914. Decided June 8, 1914. The obligation given by the surety under
Johnson v. Gearlds
JOHNSON v. GEARLDS. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE DISTRICT OP MINNESOTA. No. 802. Argued May 1, 1914. Decided June 8, 1914. Where complainant’s entire case rests on the construction of treaties with Indians in
Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. Harris
MISSOURI, KANSAS & TEXAS RAILWAY COMPANY OF TEXAS v. HARRIS. ERROR TO THE JUSTICE COURT, PRECINCT NO. 6, HOPKINS COUNTY, TEXAS. No. 604. Submitted February 24, 1914. Decided June 8, 1914. Missouri, Kansas■ & Texas By. v. Cade, 233 U. S. 642
Dale v. Pattison
DALE v. PATTISON. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 330. Argued April 23, 1914. Decided June 8, 1914. The legal effect of a transaction involving pledge or hypothecation depends upon the local law; and if t
Grannis v. Ordean
GRANNIS v. ORDEAN. GRANNIS v. WHITESIDE. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Nos. 325, 326. Argued April 27, 28, 1914. Decided June 8, 1914. Where the trial court did not infringe any Federal right of plaintiff in error, b
Gilson v. United States
GILSON v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 207. Submitted May 6, 1914. Decided June 8, 1914. The settled rule of this court that the concurring findings of two courts below will not be distu
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.