Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1914 Cases
315 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Carlson v. Washington ex rel. Curtiss
CARLSON v. STATE OF WASHINGTON, ON THE RELATION OF CURTISS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP WASHINGTON. No. 307. Submitted March 17, 1914. Decided May 25, 1914. Although plaintiff in error, after setting up a Federal defense in t
Ocampo v. United States
OCAMPO v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS. No. 270. Argued March 12, 13, 1914. Decided May 25, 1914. Section 2 of act No. 612 of the Philippine Commission of February 3, 1903, providing that in cases tria
Wabash Railroad v. Hayes
WABASH RAILROAD COMPANY v. HAYES. ERROR TO THE APPELLATE COURT OE ILLINOIS, FIRST DISTRICT. No. 843. Motion to dismiss submitted April 27, 1914. Decided May 25, 1914. Plaintiff, an injured employé of an interstate common carrier by rail, su
New Orleans & Northeastern Railroad v. National Rice Milling Co.
NEW ORLEANS & NORTHEASTERN RAILROAD CO. v. NATIONAL RICE MILLING CO. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP LOUISIANA. No. 615. Argued February 27, 1914. Decided May 25, 1914. Where the judgment of a state court rests upon an independen
Washington Securities Co. v. United States
WASHINGTON SECURITIES CO. v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS PQR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 367. Argued May 7, 8, 1914. Decided May 25, 1914. Findings of fact concurred in by two lower Federal courts will not be disturbe
Taylor v. Anderson
TAYLOR v. ANDERSON. error to the circuit court op the united states for THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA. No. 338. Submitted April 30, 1914. Decided May 25, 1914. Whether a case begun in a District Court is one arising under the Constitutio
Ex parte Roe
EX PARTE ROE. PETITION FOE WEIT OF MANDAMUS. No. 13, Original. Argued April 6, 1914. Decided May 25, 1914. When a Federal court decides that a case removable from a state court on independent grounds is not made otherwise by § 6 of the Empl
Schmidt v. Bank of Commerce
SCHMIDT v. BANK OF COMMERCE. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF NEW MEXICO. No. 281. Argued March 19, 1914. Decided May 25, 1914. This court accepts the rulings of the territorial courts on local questions of pleading and practi
Atlantic Transport Co. v. Maryland ex rel. Szczesek
ATLANTIC TRANSPORT COMPANY OF WEST VIRGINIA v. STATE OF MARYLAND TO THE USE OF SZCZESEK. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 216. Argued January 29, 30, 1914. Decided May 25, 1914. Decided on-the authority
Atlantic Transport Co. v. Imbrovek
ATLANTIC TRANSPORT COMPANY OF WEST VIRGINIA v. IMBROVEK. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 215. Argued January 29, 30, 1914. Decided May 25, 1914. As a general principle, the test of admiralty jurisdicti
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Woodford
LOUISVILLE AND NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY v. WOODFORD. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KENTUCKY. No. 531. Motion to dismiss submitted March 23, 1914. Decided May 25, 1914. In order that the denial of a Federal right may be the
United States v. Axman
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. AXMAN. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 242. Argued March 9, 1914. Decided May 25, 1914. Where, after default of the original contractor, the contract is relet, the original contra
United States & Interstate Commerce Commission v. Butler County Railroad
UNITED STATES AND INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION v. BUTLER COUNTY RAILROAD COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES COMMERCE COURT. No. 837. Argued April 13, 1914. Decided May 25, 1914. The Tap Line Cases, ante, p. 1, followed to the effect t
Tap Line Cases
THE TAP LINE CASES. APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES COMMERCE COURT. Nos. 829, 830, 831, 832, 833, 834, 835, 836. Argued April 8, 9, 13, 1914. Decided May 25, 1914. An order of the Interstate Commerce Commission, based on its finding that the
Oceanic Steam Navigation Co. v. Mellor
OCEANIC STEAM NAVIGATION COMPANY, LIMITED, AS OWNER OF THE STEAMSHIP TITANIC, v. MELLOR. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 798. Argued January 13, 14, 1914. Decided May 25, 1914. This case falls withi
Detroit Steel Cooperage Co. v. Sistersville Brewing Co.
DETROIT STEEL COOPERAGE COMPANY v. SISTERSVILLE BREWING COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 368. Argued May 8, 1914. Decided May 25, 1914. The common law knows no objection to what is commonly cal
Valdes v. Larrinaga
VALDES v. LARRINAGA. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR PORTO RICO. No. 343. Argued May 4, 1914. Decided May 25, 1914. Although the contract for participation in profits involved in this case may not have created a part
Erie Railroad v. Williams
ERIE RAILROAD COMPANY v. WILLIAMS, AS COMMISSIONER OF LABOR OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. No. 274. Argued April 27, 1914. Decided May 25, 1914. While it is a fundamental principle that person
Erie Railroad v. New York
ERIE RAILROAD COMPANY v. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. No. 266. Argued April 24, 27, 1914. Decided May 25, 1914. When Congress acts in such manner as to manifest its constitutional aut
McDonald v. Oregon Railroad & Navigation Co.
McDONALD v. OREGON RAILROAD AND NAVIGATION COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OF OREGON. No. 463. Motion to dismiss submitted May 4, 1914. Decided May 25, 1914. The due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment does not contr
Bowe v. Scott
BOWE v. SCOTT. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF VIRGINIA. No. 360. Argued May 6, 1914. Decided May 25, 1914. Where complainants duly asserted Federal rights in opposition to contemplated municipal action, the decision o
Ennis Water Works v. City of Ennis
ENNIS WATER WORKS v. CITY OF ENNIS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP TEXAS. No. 305. Argued May 1, 4, 1914 Decided May 25, 1914. Although when the assertion is made that contract rights are impaired it is the duty of this court to
Gallagher v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.
No. 359. Peter Gallagher, Administrator, etc., Plaintiff in Error v. Florida East Coast Railway Company. In error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Submitted May 4, 1914. Decided May 11, 1914.
Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. Cade
MISSOURI, KANSAS & TEXAS RAILWAY COMPANY OF TEXAS v. CADE. ERROR TO THE JUSTICE COURT, PRECINCT NO. 7, DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS. No. 522. Submitted February 24, 1914. Decided May 11, 1914. Where a state statute has been held unconstitutional un
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.