Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1914 Cases
315 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD CO. v. WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH CO. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI. No. 337. Argued March 20, 1914. Decided June 8, 1914. On a direct appeal under
Citizens Banking Co. v. Ravenna National Bank
CITIZENS BANKING COMPANY v. RAVENNA NATIONAL BANK. CERTIFICATE frIom.the circuit court of appeals for the SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 288. Argued March 16, 1914. Decided June 8, 1914. The failure by an insolvent judgment debtor and for a period of o
Houston, East & West Texas Railway Co. v. United States
HOUSTON, EAST AND WEST TEXAS RAILWAY COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. TEXAS AND PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEALS FROM THE .COMMERCE COURT. Nos. 567, 568. Argued October 28, 29, 1913 Decided June 8, 1914. The object of the commerce
City of Sault Ste. Marie v. International Transit Co.
CITY OF SAULT STE. MARIE v. INTERNATIONAL TRANSIT COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT- OF MICHIGAN. No. 323. Argued March 20, 1914. Decided June 8, 1914. A State may not make commercial' int
Port Richmond & Bergen Point Ferry Co. v. Board of Chosen Freeholders
PORT RICHMOND AND BERGEN POINT FERRY COMPANY v. BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS OF HUDSON COUNTY. ERROR TO THE COURT OF ERRORS AND, APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY. No. 225. Argued March 4, 1914. Decided June 8, 1914. At common law the right
Interstate Commerce Commission v. Southern Pacific Co.
INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION v. SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY. APPEAL PROM THE COMMERCE COURT. No. 98. Argued January 14, 15, 1914. Decided June 8, 1914. Los Angeles Switching Case, ante, p. 294, followed and applied to similar switching charg
Los Angeles Switching Case
THE LOS ANGELES SWITCHING CASE. APPEAL FROM THE COMMERCE COURT. No. 98. Argued January 14, 15, 1914. Decided June 8, 1914. An order of the Interstate Commerce Commission requiring railway companies to desist from exacting charges for delive
Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Georgia
ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY v. STATE OF GEORGIA. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF GEORGIA. No. 24. Argued April 17, 1913. Decided June 8, 1914. The existence of difference of opinion as to which is the best form of nec
Stone, Sand & Gravel Co. v. United States
STONE, SAND AND GRAVEL COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 302. Argued April 23, 1914. Decided June 8, 1914. Where the contract contains a provision for a method of annulment and liquid
Lazarus v. Prentice
LAZARUS, MICHEL & LAZARUS v. PRENTICE, RECEIVER OF MUSICA. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 1012. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted May 4, 1914. Decided June 8, 1914. Under clause 20 of § 2 of the Bank
United States v. First National Bank
UNITED STATES v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF DETROIT, MINNESOTA. UNITED STATES v. NICHOLS-CHISHOLM LUMBER COMPANY. UNITED STATES v. NICHOLS-CHISHOLM LUMBER COMPANY. APPEALS PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. Nos. 873, 874,
United States v. United Engineering & Contracting Co.
UNITED STATES v. UNITED ENGINEERING AND CONTRACTING COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 381. Submitted May 8, 1914. Decided June 8, 1914. While reasonable contracts for liquidated damages for delay are not to be regarded as penalt
United States v. Buffalo Pitts Co.
UNITED STATES v. BUFFALO PITTS COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 369. Submitted May 5, 1914. Decided June 8, 1914. In cases brought under the Tucker Act and coming to this court from a District or Ci
Keokee Consolidated Coke Co. v. Taylor
KEOKEE CONSOLIDATED COKE COMPANY v. TAYLOR. SAME v. KELLY. EEEOE TO THE SUPBEME COUET OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF VIEGINIA. Nos. 372, 373. Submitted May 7, 1914. Decided June 8, 1914. This court does not go behind the construction given to a
International Harvester Co. of America v. Kentucky
INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER COMPANY OF AMERICA v. COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY. ERROR TO THE COURT OP APPEALS OP THE STATE OP KENTUCKY. Nos. 276, 291, 292. Argued April 23, 24, 1914. Decided June 8, 1914. An anti-trust criminal law may not necessar
International Harvester Co. of America v. Missouri
INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER COMPANY OF AMERICA v. STATE OF MISSOURI. EEEOR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP MISSOURI. No. 166. Argued April 29, 1914. Decided June 8, 1914. Although the state appellate court may not have referred to the cons
Mullen v. Simmons
MULLEN v. SIMMONS, SHERIFF OF JOHNSTON COUNTY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP OKLAHOMA.,, No. 263. Submitted May 11, 1914. Decided June 8, 1914. The policy of Congress in regard to restrictions upon alienation of allotments has
Van Dyke v. Cordova Copper Co.
VAN DYKE v. CORDOVA COPPER COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA. No. 735. Motion to dismiss submitted May 11, 1914. Decided June 8, 1914. Although words may be superfluous, if the statute be construed in accordance wi
Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. United States
FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COMMERCE COURT. No. 383. Argued January 15, 16, 1913. Decided June 8, 1914. The rule that a finding of fact made by the Interstate Commerce Commission concerning a matter
New York Life Insurance v. Head
NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. HEAD. error to the supreme court of THE STATE OF MISSOURI. No. 255. Argued March 10, 1914. Decided June 8, 1914. Decided on authority of the preceding case. 241 Missouri, 420, reversed. The facts are state
New York Life Insurance v. Head
NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. HEAD. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF- THE STATE OF MISSOURI. No. 254. Argued March 10, 1914. Decided June 8, 1914. There is a clear distinction between questions concerning the operation and effect of the l
Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. American Tie & Timber Co.
TEXAS & PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. AMERICAN TIE & TIMBER CO., LTD. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE PIPTH CIRCUIT. No. 180. Argued January 20, 21, 1914. Decided June 8, 1914. Whether a class tariff includes a particular commodi
Manhattan Life Insurance v. Cohen
MANHATTAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK v. COHEN, EXECUTOR. ERROR TO THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF TEXAS. No. 160. Submitted April 17, 1914. Decided June 8, 1914. AFederal question
Virginia v. West Virginia
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA v. STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA. MOTION OF THE STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SUPPLEMENTAL ANSWER TO THE BILL OF COMPLAINT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA. No. 2, Original. Argued April 16, 17, 1914. Decided J
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.