Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1915 Cases
306 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Dowagiac Manufacturing Co. v. Minnesota Moline Plow Co.
DOWAGIAC MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. MINNESOTA MOLINE PLOW COMPANY. DOWAGIAC MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. SMITH. WRITS OF CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. Nos. 6, 7. Argued April 15, 16, 1913. Decided January 11,
Wathen v. Jackson Oil & Refining Co.
WATHEN v. JACKSON OIL & REFINING COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI. No. 79. Submitted November 9, 1914. Decided January 11, 1915. The right to restrain the enforcement of a
Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Holbrook
NORFOLK & WESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. HOLBROOK. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 516. Argued December 1, 2, 1914. Decided January 5, 1915. Under the Employers’ Liability Act, where death is instantaneous the
Hendrick v. Maryland
HENDRICK v. STATE OF MARYLAND. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, STATE OF MARYLAND. No. 77. Argued November 11, 12, 1914. Decided January 5, 1915. Only those whose rights are .directly affected can properly question the
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Finn
LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY v. FINN AND OTHERS AS RAILROAD COMMISSION OF KENTUCKY. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY. No. 546. Argued December 11, 14, 1914. Decided January
Brown v. Fletcher
BROWN, AND SCHERMERHORN, TRUSTEE UNDER WILL OF CUNNINGHAM, v. FLETCHER, TRUSTEE OF BRAKER. PROVIDENT LIFE AND TRUST COMPANY AS EXECUTOR OF WOOD v. SAME. APPEALS FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW Y
Hull v. Dicks
HULL v. DICKS. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 78. Argued November 12, 1914. Decided January 5, 1915. Where a resident citizen of Georgia has been duly adjudicated a bankrupt and dies after such adju
Mercelis v. Wilson
MERCELIS v. WILSON. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR PORTO RICO. No. 68. Submitted November 6, 1914. Decided January 5, 1915. While parties cannot give jurisdiction and may sometimes except to an erroneous ruling in t
Jeffrey Manufacturing Co. v. Blagg
JEFFREY MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. BLAGG. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OHIO. No. 511. Argued December 1, 1914. Decided January 5, 1915. The negligence of a fellow servant is more likely to be a cause of injury in larger establis
Gilbert v. David
GILBERT, ADMINISTRATOR OF SELLECK, v. DAVID, ADMINISTRATRIX OF SELLECK. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. No. 97. Argued December 4, 1914. Decided January 5, 1915. As § 37, Judicial Code, does
New York ex rel. Cornell Steamboat Co. v. Sohmer
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ON THE RELATION OF CORNELL STEAMBOAT COMPANY v. SOHMER, AS COMPTROLLER OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. No. 62. Argued November 5, 1914. Decided January 5, 1915.
South Covington & Cincinnati Street Railway Co. v. City of Covington
SOUTH COVINGTON & CINCINNATI STREET RAILWAY COMPANY v. CITY OF COVINGTON. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KENTUCKY. No. 28. Argued October 30, 1914. Decided January 5, 1915. Whether given commerce is of an interstate character
Lawlor v. Loewe
LAWLOR v. LOEWE. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 358. Argued December 10, 11, 1914. Decided January 5, 1915. Irrespective of compulsion or even agreement to observe its intimation, the circulation of a “we
United States v. Erie Railroad
UNITED STATES v. ERIE RAILROAD COMPANY. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 552. Argued December 14, 1914. Decided January 5, 1915. Quaere, whether'§ 184, Penal Code, prohibiting the c
Farish v. State Banking Board
FARISH v. STATE BANKING BOARD OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA. STATE BANKING BOARD OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA v. FARISH. appeals prom the district court op the united states • POR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OP OKLAHOMA. Nos. 446, 447. Argued October 14, 1
American Water Softener Co. v. Lankford
AMERICAN WATER SOFTENER COMPANY v. LANKFORD AND OTHERS, COMPOSING THE STATE BANKING BOARD OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA. No. 418. Argued October 14, 15, 19
Lankford v. Platte Iron Works Co.
LANKFORD AND OTHERS, COMPOSING THE STATE BANKING BOARD OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA, v. PLATTE IRON WORKS COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA No. 381. Argued October 14, 15, 1914. De
Maryland Steel Co. v. United States
MARYLAND STEEL COMPANY OF BALTIMORE COUNTY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 104. Argued December 8, 1914. Decided January 5, 1915. Although parties to a contract may agree that time is of the essence and may stipulate
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.