Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1915 Cases
306 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Meeker v. Lehigh Valley Railroad
MEEKER v. LEHIGH VALLEY RAILROAD. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 435. Argued October 13, 14, 1914. Decided February 23, 1915. Meeker & Co. v. Lehigh Valley R. R., ante, p. 412, followed as to construct
Meeker v. Lehigh Valley Railroad
MEEKER, SURVIVING PARTNER OF MEEKER & COMPANY, v. LEHIGH VALLEY RAILROAD COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 434. Argued October 13, 14, 1914. Decided February 23, 1915. The limitations in Rev. Sta
United States v. Smull
UNITED STATES v. SMULL. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON. No. 598. Argued January 7, 1915. Decided February 23, 1915. A charge of crime against the United States must have clear legislative basis.
Wright-Blodgett Co. v. United States
WRIGHT-BLODGETT COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. SAME v. SAME. SAME v. SAME. SAME v. SAME. SAME v. SAME. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. Nos. 151, 152, 154, 155, 156. Argued January 26, 27, 1915. Decided February 2
Bosley v. McLaughlin
BOSLEY v. McLAUGHLIN, LABOR COMMISSIONER OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. SAME v. SAME. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Nos. 362, 363. Argued January 12, 1915. Decided February 23, 191
Miller v. Wilson
MILLER v. WILSON, SHERIFF OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. No. 112. Argued January 12, 1915. Decided February 23, 1915. The liberty of contract guaranteed by the due process cl
Pennsylvania Co. v. United States
PENNSYLVANIA COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 691. Argued December 14, 15, 1914. Decided February 23, 1915. Section 3 of the Act to Regulate Commerce forbid
Rail & River Coal Co. v. Yaple
RAIL & RIVER COAL COMPANY v. YAPLE, ET AL., CONSTITUTING THE INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO. APPEAL FROM UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. No. 513. Argued December 1, 1914. Decided February 23, 1915. A state pol
United States ex rel. McReynolds v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad
UNITED STATES, BY McREYNOLDS, ATTORNEY GENERAL, v. LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY. ERROR TO AND APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY. No. 499. Argued January 5, 6, 1915. Decided February
American Car & Foundry Co. v. Kettelhake
AMERICAN CAR & FOUNDRY COMPANY v. KETTELHAKE. ERROR TO ST. LOUIS COURT OF APPEALS, STATE OF MISSOURI. No. 138. Argued January 20, 1915. Decided Febuary 23, 1915. Where there is a joint cause of action against defendants resident of plaintif
Iowa Central Railway Co. v. Bacon
IOWA CENTRAL RAILWAY COMPANY v. BACON, ADMINISTRATOR OF LOCKHART. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IOWA. No. 130. Submitted January 19, 1915. Decided February 23, 1915. If the suit be one of which the Circuit Court can rightfully
Globe Bank & Trust Co. of Paducah v. Martin
GLOBE BANK AND TRUST COMPANY OF PADUCAH, KENTUCKY, v. MARTIN, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY OF ATKINS. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF PADUCAH, KENTUCKY, v. SAME. OLD STATE NATIONAL BANK OF EVANSVILLE, INDIANA, v. SAME. MARTIN, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY OF ATKI
George N. Pierce Co. v. Wells, Fargo & Co.
GEORGE N. PIERCE COMPANY, PETITIONER, v. WELLS, FARGO & COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 14. Argued December 8, 1913. Restored to docket October 26, 1914. Reargued January 7, 1915. Decided Febr
Fox v. Washington
FOX v. STATE OF WASHINGTON. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. No. 134. Submitted January 19, 1915. Decided February 23, 1915. Where the highest court of the State, in overruling a demurrer, affirmed that the Constitutio
United States v. Erie Railroad
UNITED STATES v. ERIE RAILROAD COMPANY, APPEALS FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Nos. 493, 494. Argued January 11, 12, 1915. Decided February 23, 1915. A ruling of the Interstate Commerce C
Mutual Film Corp. v. Hodges
MUTUAL FILM CORPORATION OF MISSOURI v. HODGES, GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS. No. 597. Argued January 6, 7, 1915. Decided February 23, 1915. Mutual Film, Corp
Mutual Film Co. v. Industrial Commission of Ohio
MUTUAL FILM COMPANY v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. No. 457. Argued January 6, 7, 1915. Decided February 23, 1915. Decided on authority of Mutual Film
Mutual Film Corp. v. Industrial Commission of Ohio
MUTUAL FILM CORPORATION v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. No. 456. Argued January 6, 7, 1915. Decided February 23, 1915. Where provisions for censorship-
Truskett v. Closser
TRUSKETT v. CLOSSER. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 160. Argued January 28, 1915. Decided February 23, 1915. The qualification “except as otherwise specifically provided by law,” . as used in § 6 of the
Brolan v. United States
BROLAN v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 645. Submitted January 5, 1915. Decided February 23, 1915. In a case from the District Court, if the power to review atta
Olympia Mining & Milling Co. v. Kerns
OLYMPIA MINING & MILLING COMPANY, LIMITED, v. KERNS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO. No. 495. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted January 25, 1915. Decided February 23, 1915. This court has no jurisdiction under § 237, J
Evens & Howard Fire Brick Co. v. United States
EVENS AND HOWARD FIRE BRICK COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. No. 567. Argued October 20, 1914. Decided February 23, 1915. The court below, in settling the de
United States v. Terminal Railroad Ass'n of St. Louis
UNITED STATES v. TERMINAL RAILROAD ASSOCIATION OF ST. LOUIS. TERMINAL RAILROAD ASSOCIATION OF ST. LOUIS v. UNITED STATES. EVENS & HOWARD FIRE BRICK COMPANY, PETITIONER. APPEALS FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DI
Washington, Alexandria & Mt. Vernon Railway Co. v. Downey
WASHINGTON, ALEXANDRIA AND MT. VERNON RAILWAY COMPANY v. DOWNEY. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 144. Argued January 21, 1915. Decided February 23, 1915. The expression “law of the United States,” referred to
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.