Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1915 Cases
306 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Southern Operating Co. v. Hays
SOUTHERN OPERATING COMPANY v. HAYS, COUNTY CLERK OF HAMILTON COUNTY, TENNESSEE. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF TENNESSEE. No. 122. Argued January 14, 1915. Decided February 23, 1915. Decided on the authority of Heyman v. Hays, a
Heyman v. Hays
HEYMAN v. HAYS, COUNTY CLERK OF HAMILTON COUNTY, TENNESSEE. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF TENNESSEE. No. 121. Argued January 14, 1915. Decided February 23, 1915. The rulings of this court concerning the operation of the commerc
D. R. Wilder Manufacturing Co. v. Corn Products Refining Co.
D. R. WILDER MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. CORN PRODUCTS REFINING COMPANY. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF GEORGIA. No. 71. Argued November 9, 1914. Decided February 23, 1915. Where the pleading of the plaintiff in error demurred t
Ex parte Fletcher
No. —. Original. Ex parte: In the Matter of James J. Fletcher et al., Petitioners. Motion for leave to file petition for writ of habeas corpus submitted January 25, 1915. Decided February 1, 1915. Mr. Henry E. Davis and Mr. James A. O’Shea
Illinois Central Railroad v. Fuentes
ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY v. FUENTES ET AL., CONSTITUTING THE RAILROAD COMMISSION OF LOUISIANA. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OP LOUISIANA. No. 423. Argued January 8, 1915. Decided Febr
Wilmington Transportation Co. v. Railroad Commission of California
WILMINGTON TRANSPORTATION COMPANY v. RAILROAD COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. No. 369. Argued December 15, 16, 1914. Decided February 1, 1915. The mere existence of Federal power
United States v. Holte
UNITED STATES v. HOLTE. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. No. 628. Argued January 8, 1915. Decided February 1, 1915. A woman who is transported in violation of the White Slave Traffic Ac
Gallardo y Seary v. Noble
GALLARDO Y SEARY v. NOBLE. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF PORTO RICO. No. 141. Argued January 20, 1915. Decided February 1, 1915. A statement of the condition of the record title made by an owner of
Grant Timber & Manufacturing Co. v. Gray
GRANT TIMBER AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. GRAY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA. No. 136. Argued January 19, 20, 1915. Decided February 1, 1915. A State may, without violating the Fourteenth Amendment, protect establish
Board of County Commissioners v. Home Savings Bank
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER v. HOME SAVINGS BANK. WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 126. Argued January 15, 1915. Decided January 26, 1915. No exception or bill
Simon v. Southern Railway Co.
SIMON v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIKCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POE THE PIPTH CIRCUIT. No. 34. Argued November 2, 3, 1914. Decided January 25, 1915. United States courts by virtue of their general equity powers have jurisdiction
United States v. Jones
UNITED STATES v. JONES, ADMINISTRATOR. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 450. Argued December 9, 1914. Decided January 25, 1915. The tax imposed by the War Revenue Act of 1898 was purely a succession tax. It was not laid upon the entire
Duffy v. Charak
DUFFY v. CHARAK, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY OF JULES & FREDERIC COMPANY. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE FIRST CIRCUIT. No. 120. Argued January 14, 1915. Decided January 25, 1915. A taking possession by the mortgagee of the pers
Curtin v. United States
CURTIN v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OP NEW YORK. No. 472. Argued December 16, 1914. Decided January 25, 1915. Decided on the authority of Burdick y. United States, ante, p. 79.
Burdick v. United States
BURDICK v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OP NEW YORK. No. 471. Argued December 16, 1914. Decided January 25, 1915. Acceptance, as well as delivery, of a pardon is essential to its
Coppage v. State
COPPAGE v. STATE OF KANSAS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 48. Submitted October 30, 1914. Decided January 25, 1915. The Kansas statute declaring it a misdemeanor punishable by fine or imprisonment for an employer to
Stearns v. Wood
LIEUTENANT COLONEL STEARNS v. BRIGADIER GENERAL WOOD. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE NORTHERN. DISTRICT OP OHIO. No. 647. Argued December 18, 1914. Decided January 18, 1915. The province of courts is to decide r
Lesser v. Gray
LESSER v. GRAY. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF GEORGIA. No. 110. Submitted December 9, 1914. Decided January 18, 1915. Where plaintiff in error seasonably sets up and claims that, because the bankruptcy court adjudicated his
Shellenbarger v. Fewell
SHELLENBARGER v. FEWELL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA. No. 103. Argued December 7, 8, 1914. Decided January 18, 1915. Reynolds v. Fewell, ante, p. 58, followed to the effect that 'under § 7 of the Original Creek Agree
Reynolds v. Fewell
REYNOLDS v. FEWELL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OP OKLAHOMA. No. 102. Argued December 7, 8, 1914. Decided January 18, 1915. The courts of Oklahoma have held that under § 7 of the Original Creek Agreement of 1901 a non-citizen hu
Yost v. Dallas County
YOST v. DALLAS COUNTY. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT’ COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 604. Argued January 6, 1915. Decided January 18, 1915. The obligation of bonds issued by a county pursuant to legislative authority is an obli
Kinney v. Plymouth Rock Squab Co.
KINNEY v. PLYMOUTH ROCK SQUAB COMPANY. APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO DOCKET AND PROSECUTE WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FEES. No. . Decided January 18, 1915. Under the act of July 20, 1892, c. 209, -27 Stat. 252, as amended by the act of June 25, 1910,
Arizona & New Mexico Railway Co. v. Clark
ARIZONA & NEW MEXICO RAILWAY COMPANY v. CLARK. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 347. Argued December 1, 1914. Decided January 11, 1915. Where an action under the Employers’ Liability Act of 1908 was pending i
Wadley Southern Railway Co. v. Georgia
WADLEY SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. GEORGIA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF GEORGIA. No. 27. Argued January 30, 1914. Decided January 11, 1915. The general common-law rule that a carrier has the option of demand- ■ ing freight in
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.