Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1916 Cases
296 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
New York, Philadelphia & Norfolk Railroad v. Peninsula Produce Exchange
NEW YORK, PHILADELPHIA & NORFOLK RAILROAD COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. PENINSULA PRODUCE EXCHANGE OF MARYLAND. ERROR TO THE COURT OP APPEALS OP THE STATE OP MARYLAND. No. 137. Argued December 15, 16, 1915. Decided January 24, 1916. The C
Mt. Vernon-Woodberry Cotton Duck Co. v. Alabama Interstate Power Co.
MT. VERNON-WOODBERRY COTTON DUCK COMPANY v. ALABAMA INTERSTATE POWER COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP ALABAMA. No. 200. Submitted January 10, 1916. Decided January 24, 1916. Prohibition is a distinct suit and the judgment
Fleitmann ex rel. Stockholders of the Consolidated Street Lighting Co. v. Welsbach Street Lighting Co.
FLEITMANN, SUING ON BEHALF OF STOCKHOLDERS OF THE CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING COMPANY, v. WELSBACH STREET LIGHTING COMPANY. SAME v. SHAW. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE SECOND' CIRCUIT. Nos. 145, 146. Argued December 17,
Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad
BRUSHABER v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. APPEAL PROM' THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORE. No. 140. Argued October 14, 15, 1915. Decided January 24, 1916. Under proper averments a stockholder’s
Vandalia Railroad v. Stilwell
No. 172. Vandalia Railroad Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Charles Stilwell. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Indiana. Argued January 14, 1916. Decided January 17, 1916. Mr. Samuel 0. Pickens, Mr. Frederic D. McKenney and Mr. J
Coates v. District of Columbia
No. 156. Leonard R. Coates, Plaintiff in Error, v. The District of Columbia. In erron to the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia, Argued January 7 and 10, 1916. Decided January 17, 1916. Mr. F. P.. B. Sands for the plaintiff in err
Nelson v. Wood
No. 158. Hilma Nelson, Plaintiff in Error, v. Richard G. Wood. In error to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Argued January 11,12,1916. Decided January 17, 1916. Mr. A. J. H. Frank for the plaintiff in error.
Rogers v. Hennepin County
ROGERS v. HENNEPIN COUNTY. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. No. 411. Argued December 6, 1915. Decided January 17, 1916. In an action brought by a number of complainants to restrain the colle
Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Meese
NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. MEESE. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 133. Argued December 10, 1915. Decided January 17, 1916. Federal courts must accept the construction of a state statute deliber
White v. United States
WHITE v. UNITED STATES. FORD v. UNITED STATES. APPEALS FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. Nos. 153, 154. Argued January 7, 1915. Decided January 17, 1916. The act of March 4, 1913, c. 148, 37 Stat. 891, granting officers of the Navy, who had been ad
Basso v. United States
BASSO v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 143. Argued January 6, 1916. Decided January 17, 1916. The rule that the Court of Claims has not jurisdiction of actions founded on tort is based on a policy imposed by necessity
Deaton v. Kentucky
No. 177. D. F. Deaton, Plaintiff in Error, v. The Commonwealth of Kentucky. In error to the .Court of Appeals of the State of Kentucky. January 13, 1916. Mr. Edward 8. Jouett for the plaintiff in error. No appearance for the defendant in er
Ex parte Whitt
No. -. Original. Ex parte: In the Matter of Robert B. Whitt, Petitioner. Submitted January 6, 1916. Decided January 10, 1916. Mr. Frank W. Clancy for the petitioner.
Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad v. Alexander
No. 148. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Louise Alexander, Administratrix, etc. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Wisconsin. Argued January 6 and 7, 1916. Decided January 10, 191
Seaboard Air Line Railway v. Horton
SEABOARD AIR LINE RAILWAY v. HORTON. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. 541. Argued November 30, December 1, 1915. Decided January 10, 1916. An employé who knows of a defect arising from the employer’s negligence
Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Dettlebach
CLEVELAND, CINCINNATI, CHICAGO & ST. LOUIS RAILWAY COMPANY v. DETTLEBACH. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH DISTRICT, STATE OF OHIO. No. 229. Argued November 29, 1915. Decided January 10, 1916. The effect of an express contract, made fo
New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. Gray
NEW YORK CENTRAL & HUDSON RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY v. GRAY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT, STATE OF NEW YORK. No. 147. Argued December 17, 1915. Decided January 10, 1916. The anti-pass provision in th
Kanawha & Michigan Railway Co. v. Kerse
KANAWHA & MICHIGAN RAILWAY COMPANY v. KERSE, ADMINISTRATOR OF BARRY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF KANAWHA COUNTY, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA. No. 129. Argued December 10,1915. Decided January 10, 1916. Where the highest appellate court of the
Home Bond Co. v. McChesney
HOME BOND COMPANY v. McCHESNEY, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY OF AMERICAN FIBRE REED COMPANY AND NEW ENGLAND CHAIR COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 90. Argued December 3, 1915. Decided January 10, 1916. T
Interstate Amusement Co. v. Albert
INTERSTATE AMUSEMENT COMPANY v. ALBERT. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF TENNESSEE. No. 69. Argued November 10, 1915. Decided January 10, 1916. An exception to the general rule that findings of fact of the state court in ordinary
Shanks v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad
SHANKS v. DELAWARE, LACKAWANNA AND WESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY. ERROR to the supreme court of the state op NEW YORK. No. 477. Argued November 30, 1915. Decided January 10, 1916. To recover under the Employers’ Liability Act, not only must the
Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Wright
CHICAGO, ROCK ISLAND & PACIFIC RAILWAY CO. v. WRIGHT. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP NEBRASKA. No. 167. Argued November 30, 1915. Decided January 10, 1916. Taking an engine from one State to another, although only for repairs, i
Moss v. Ramey
MOSS v. RAMEY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP IDAHO. No. 61. Argued December 9, 1915. Decided January 10, 1916. The inference naturally arising from the silence of the field notes and plat that there was no island at the time of
United States v. Ross
UNITED STATES v. ROSS. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 131. Argued December 10, 1915. Decided January 10, 1916. An army regulation can have force only so far as it may be deemed to be in accord with the Acts of Congress. Quaere whether
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.