Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1916 Cases
296 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Press Publishing Co. v. Gillette
No. 841. Press Publishing Company, Petitioner, v. Cassius E. Gillette. February 28, 1916. Mr. Joseph H. Choate and Mr. Howard Taylor for the petitioner. Mr. D. Cady Herrick for the respondent.
Gardiner v. William S. Butler & Co.
No. 831. Robert H. Gardiner, etc., Petitioner, v. William S. Butler & Company (Inc.), etc. February 28, 1916. Mr. Bentley W. Warren and Mr. Francis B. James for the petitioner. Mr. Charles F. Choate, Jr., and Mr. Frederick, H. Nash for the
Ex parte Lamar
No. —. Original. Ex parte: In the Matter of David Lamar, Petitioner. Submitted February 21, 1916. Decided February 28, 1916. Mr. A. Leo Everett for the petitioner.
Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co. v. United States
PHILADELPHIA AND READING RAILWAY COMPANY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION, AND ALLENTOWN PORTLAND CEMENT COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 4
Erie Railroad v. Prowski
No. 584. Erie Railroad Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. George Prowski, as Administrator, etc. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of New York. February 21, 1916. Mr. George F. Brownell for the plaintiff in error. No appearance for th
Borland v. Northern Trust Safe Deposit Co.
No. 821. Bruce Borland, Petitioner, v. The Northern Trust Safe Deposit Company. February 21, 1916. Mr. George P. Fisher and Mr. Josiah McRoberts for the petitioner. Mr. George Dudley Seymour, Mr. Robert H. Parkinson and Mr. Wallace R. Lane
Southern Railway Co. v. Thurston
Nos. 230, 231, 232 and 233. Southern Railway Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. W. C. Thurston. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of North Carolina. Submitted January 25, 1916. Decided February 21, 1916. Mr. John K. Graves for the pla
Illinois Central Railroad v. Cousins
No. 227. Illinois Central Railroad Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Charles W. Cousins. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Minnesota. Argued January 25, 1916. Decided February 21, 1916. Mr. W. S. Horton and Mr. Blewett Lee for the
Butler v. Perry
BUTLER v. PERRY, SHERIFF OF COLUMBIA COUNTY, FLORIDA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. No. 182. Submitted January 14,1916. Decided February 21, 1916. The term involuntary servitude, as used in the Thirteenth Amendment, wa
Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. Railroad Commission
SEABOARD AIR LINE RAILWAY COMPANY v. RAILROAD COMMISSION OF GEORGIA. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 170. Argued January 13, 14, 1916. Decided February 21, 1916. It.is within the pbwer of a State, acting
Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Pennsylvania
FIDELITY & DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 114. Argued January 6, 1916. Decided February 21, 1916. A State may, not directly and- materially hinder th
Carolina Glass Co. v. South Carolina
CAROLINA GLASS COMPANY v. STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA. SAME v. MURRAY ET AL., CONSTITUTING THE STATE DISPENSARY COMMISSION OF SOUTH CAROLINA. SAME v. MURRAY. SAME v. MURRAY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME CQURT 0/ THE STATE OE' SOUTH CAROLINA. ' v . ERRO
O'Keefe v. United States
O’KEEFE, RECEIVER OF NEW ORLEANS, TEXAS & MEXICO RAILROAD COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES AND THE INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. No. 516. Argued December
Union Naval Stores Co. v. United States
UNION NAVAL STORES COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH' CIRCUIT. No. 80. Submitted December 20, 1915. Decided February 21, 1916. A claim of the United States for spirits of turpentine and rosin take
Guerini Stone Co. v. P. J. Carlin Construction Co.
GUERINI STONE CO. v. P. J. CARLIN CONSTRUCTION CO. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR PORTO RICO. No. 78. Argued November 12, 1915. Decided February 21, 1916. In the case of sub-contracts, as in other cases of written agre
Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. Wolf Bros.
HAMILTON-BROWN SHOE CO. v. WOLF BROTHERS & CO. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT C’OURT OF APPEALS FOR THE' • EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 37. Argued October 28, 29, 1915. Decided February 21, 1916. The words “The American Girl” as applied to women’s shoes
Embree v. Kansas City & Liberty Boulevard Road District
EMBREE v. KANSAS CITY AND LIBERTY BOULEVARD ROAD DISTRICT. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI. No. 187. Argued January 18, 19, 1916. Decided February 21, 1916. Where a taxing district is not established by the'legislature,
St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. Shepherd
ST. LOUIS AND SAN FRANCISCO RAILROAD COMPANY v. SHEPHERD. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA. No. 160. Submitted January 12,1916. Decided February 21, 1916. A Federal question which is first set up and asserted in a petitio
Lusk v. Botkin
LUSK ET AL., RECEIVERS OF ST. LOUIS & SAN FRANCISCO RAILROAD COMPANY, v. BOTKIN, SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. ERROR.TO THE SUPREME' COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 451. Submitted January 7, 1916. Decided February 21, 1916. T
Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis Railway Co. v. Botkin
KANSAS CITY, FORT SCOTT & MEMPHIS RAILWAY COMPANY v. BOTKIN, SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP KANSAS. No. 450. Submitted January 7, 1916. Decided February 21, 1916. The State cannot lay a
Illinois Surety Co. v. United States ex rel. Peeler
ILLINOIS SURETY COMPANY v. UNITED STATES TO THE USE OF PEELER ET AL., TRADING AS FAITH GRANITE COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 176. Argued January 14, 1916. Decided February 21, 1916. Final settlem
United States v. Morrison
UNITED STATES v. MORRISON. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 138. Argued December 15, 1916. Decided February 21, 1916. •The State of Oregon did not, under § 4 of the Act of February 14,1859, c. 33, 11 Stat.
Rogers v. Hennepin County
ROGERS v. HENNEPIN COUNTY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. No. 104. Argued December 6, 1915. Decided February 21, 1916. Where the state court does not decide against plaintiff in error upon an independent state ground,
Straus v. Notaseme Hosiery Co.
ISADOR STRAUS ET AL., TRADING AS R. H. MACY & CO., v. NOTASEME HOSIERY COMPANY. certiorari to the circuit court of appeals for the SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 184. Argued January 17, 18, 1916. Decided February 21, 1916. While one using an unregiste
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.