Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1916 Cases
296 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. Guardian Trust Co.
KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. GUARDIAN TRUST COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 85. Argued December 13, 14, 15, 1915. Decided February 21, 1916. A reorganization scheme adopted upon the f
Carnegie Steel Co. v. United States
CARNEGIE STEEL COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 171. Argued January 21, 1916. Decided February 21, 1916. Ability to perform a contract is of its very essence, and delay resulting from absence of such ability is
Banning Co. v. California
BANNING COMPANY v. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA UPON THE INFORMATION OF WEBB, ATTORNEY GENERAL. ERROR.TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP CALIFORNIA. No. 73. Argued January 19, 1916. Decided February 21, 1916. The- withdrawal from sal
Title Guaranty & Surety Co. v. Idaho ex rel. Allen
TITLE GUARANTY AND SURETY COMPANY v. STATE OF IDAHO FOR THE USE OF ALLEN. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP IDAHO. No. 815. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted January 24, 1916. Decided February 21, 1916. Where the State, suing o
Innes v. Tobin
INNES v. TOBIN, SHERIFF OF BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS. ERROR TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS. No. 532. Argued January 6, 1916. Decided February 21, 1916. Prior to adoption of the Constitution, fugitives from justice were sur
Dodge v. Brady
DODGE v. BRADY, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. No. 213. Argued October 14, 15, 1915. Decided February 21, 1916. Under the exceptional conditions of. t
Dodge v. Osborn
DODGE v. OSBORN, COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 396. Argued October 14, 15, 1915. Decided February 21, 1916. Revised Stat., § 3224, is not inapplicable to taxes imposed by
Tyee Realty Co. v. Anderson
TYEE REALTY COMPANY v. ANDERSON, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE. THORNE v. SAME. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Nos. 393, 394. Argued October 14, 15,1915. Decided February 21, 1916. Br
Stanton v. Baltic Mining Co.
STANTON v. BALTIC MINING COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. No. 359. Argued October 14, 15, 1915. Decided February 21, 1916. Brushaber v. Un. Pac. R. R., ante, p. 1, followed, to
Male v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.
MALE, TRUSTEE FOR CHAPIN, v. ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW TORE. No. 220. Argued January 24, 1916. Decided February 21, 1916. Whether a subs
United States v. Andrews
UNITED STATES v. ANDREWS. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 193. Argued January 21, 24, 1916. Decided February 21, 1916. Under Rev. Stat., § 1265, an officer of the army is entitled to half pay while on leave granted by proper authority.
Cardona v. Quiñones
CARDONA v. QUIÑONES. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PORTO RICO. No. 185. Submitted January 18, 1916. Decided February 21, 1916. Where the appeal is prayed within the statutory time, the mere date of its allowance by the court is not contr
Stowe v. Taylor
No. 221. William A. Stowe, Plaintiff in Error, v. Emma F. Taylor. January 31, 1916. Mr. Hollis R. Bailey for the plaintiff in error, in support of the petition. No opposition.
Crocker v. United States
FRANK CROCKER, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY OF POSTAL SERVICE AND LOCK COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 77. Argued December 1, 2, 1915. Decided January 31, 1916. The findings of the Court of Claims in an action at law
Illinois Central Railroad v. Skaggs
ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY v. SKAGGS. EEEOE T.0 THE SUPEEME COUET OF THE STATE OP MINNESOTA. No. 194. Argued January 19, 20, 1916. Decided January 31, 1916. Where two employees of the carrier are necessarily working together, as unde
Lamar v. United States
LAMAR v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 434. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted January 17, 1916. Decided January 31, 1916. Jurisdiction is a matter of power and
Gast Realty & Investment Co. v. Schneider Granite Co.
GAST REALTY AND INVESTMENT COMPANY v. SCHNEIDER GRANITE COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI. No. 211. Argued January 21, 1916. Decided January 31, 1916. The legislature may create taxing districts to meet the expens
Kansas City Western Railway Co. v. McAdow
KANSAS CITY WESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. McADOW. ERROR TO THE KANSAS CITY COURT OF APPEALS, STATE OF MISSOURI.- No. 127. Submitted January 18, 1916. Decided January 31, 1916. If the declaration on which a ease is tried brings it under the Emp
Curtis v. West End Street Railway Co.
No. 252. Amy Curtis, Appellant, v. West End Street Railway Company et al. Appeal from the District Court of the United'States for the District of Massachusetts. January 26, 1916. Mr. Burton E. Eames for the appellant. Mr. Alexander 'Britton
Chu Tai Ngan v. Backus
No. 753. Chu Tai Ngan, Petitioner, v. Samuel W. Backus, Commissioner, etc. January 24, 1916. Mr. O. P. Stidger and Mr. C. L. Bouve for the petitioner. No brief for the respondent.
St. Louis Union Trust Co. v. Mellen
No. 735. St. Louis Union Trust Company, Petitioner, v. Mary E. Mellen et al. January 24, 1916. (See 239 U. S. 648.) Mr. W. F. Wilson and Mr. Enoch A. Chase for the petitioner. Mr. J. H. Everest and Mr. R. M. Campbell for the respondents.
County of Sioux v. Rule
No. 207. The County of Sioux, Nebraska, Plaintiff in Error, v. Newton Rule. In error to the Supreme Court .of the State of Nebraska. Submitted January 20, 1916. Decided January 24, 1916. Mr. Allen G. Fisher for the plaintiff in error. Mr. A
Bradley v. Spokane & Inland Empire Railroad
No. 186. Cyrus Bradley, Plaintiff in Error, v. Spokane & Inland Empire Railroad Company. In error to the Supretne Court of the State of Washington. Argued for plaintiff in. error and submitted for defendant in error, January 18, 1916. Decid
Loomis v. Lehigh Valley Railroad
LOOMIS v. LEHIGH VALLEY RAILROAD COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. No. 106. Argued December 6, 1915. Decided January 24, 1916. The purpose of the Act to Regulate Commerce was to secure and preserve uniformity, an
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.