Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1916 Cases
296 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Gidney v. Chappel
GIDNEY v. CHAPPEL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA. No. 263. Submitted March 8, 1916. Decided April 24, 1916. Sections 6509 and 6521, Mansfield’s Digest of the General Laws of Arkansas dealing with appeals from the Proba
Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Wall
NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY CO. v. WALL, ADMINISTRATOR. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP MONTANA. No. 350. Argued December 1, 1915. Decided April 24, 1916. Laws, in force at tbe time and place of the making of a contract and which af
McFarland v. American Sugar Refining Co.
McFARLAND, SUPERVISOR OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS OF LOUISIANA, v. AMERICAN SUGAR REFINING COMPANY. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATE& POR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OP LOUISIANA. No. 847. Argued April 11, 12, 1916. Decided April 24, 1916
United States v. Lombardo
UNITED STATES v. LOMBARDO. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON. No. 830. Submitted April 10, 1916. Decided April 24, 1916. Where a criminal statute does not define a word used therein, its
United States v. New South Farm & Home Co.
UNITED STATES v. NEW SOUTH FARM AND HOME COMPANY. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA.. No. 808. Argued April 7, 1916. Decided April 24, 1916. While the fraudulent advertisements covered by
Menasha Paper Co. v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.
MENASHA PAPER COMPANY v. CHICAGO & NORTHWESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP WISCONSIN. No. 696. Argued April 3, 1916. Decided April 24, 1916. The Hepburn Act of 1906 amending the Act to Regulate Commerce requ
Rosenberger v. Pacific Express Co.
ROSENBERGER v. PACIFIC EXPRESS COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP MISSOURI. No. 249. Argued March 8, 1916. Decided April 24, 1916. Speaking generally the States are without power to directly burden an interstate shipment un
American Surety Co. of New York v. Idaho ex rel. Mills
No. 609. American Surety Company of New York, Plaintiff in Error, v. The State of Idaho, to and for the Use and Benefit of Clara Mills et al. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Idaho. April 17, 1916. Mr. James H. Richards and Mr.
Hopkins v. Hull
No. 944. Ann S. Hopkins, Petitioner, v. Lawrence Hull, Trustee, etc. April 17, 1916. Mr. J. Grattan Macmahon for the petitioner. Miss Winifred Sullivan for the respondent.
W. A. Gaines & Co. v. Hellman Distilling Co.
No. 905. W. A. Gaines & Company, Petitioner, v. Hellman Distilling Company, etc. April 17, 1916. Mr. James Love Hopkins, Mr. Edmund F. Trabue and Mr. D. W. Lindsay for the pétitioner. Mr. W. T. Ellis and Mr. Luther Ely Smith for the respond
Ex parte Griffin
No.-. Original. Ex parte: In the Matter of James J. Griffin and Gordon M. Peacock, Petitioners. Submitted April 10, 1916. Decided April 17, 1916. Mr. Arthur E. Dowell for the petitioner.
Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Larabee Flour Mills Co.
No. 460. The Missouri Pacific Railway Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. The Larabee Flour Mills Company. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Kansas. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted April 10, 1916. Decided April 17, 1916. Mr. B
Richardson v. Fajardo Sugar Co.
RICHARDSON, AS TREASURER OF PORTO RICO, v. FAJARDO SUGAR COMPANY. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR PORTO RICO. No. 280. Argued March 13, 14, 1916. Decided April 17, 1916. In an action in the United States District Court
Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Rigsby
TEXAS & PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. RIGSBY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 523. Argued February 21, 1916. Decided April 17, 1916. Disregard of the Safety Appliance Act is a wrongful act; and, where it result
G. & C. Merriam Co. v. Saalfield
G. & C. MERRIAM COMPANY v. SAALFIELD AND OGILVIE. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OP OHIO. No. 178. Argued January 14, 17, 1916. Decided April 17, 1916. Whether* the District Court has acquired
Osborne v. Gray
OSBORNE, RECEIVER OF THE CHATTANOOGA SOUTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY, v. GRAY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP TENNESSEE. No. 373. Argued April 3, 1916. Decided April 17, 1916. In an action by representatives of an employee for his death, from negl
Kelly v. Griffin
KELLY v. GRIFFIN, JAILER OF LAKE COUNTY, ILLINOIS. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OP ILLINOIS. No. 777. Argued April 6, 7, 1916. Decided April 17, 1916. That the arrest by state or municipal au
Chin Fong v. Backus
CHIN FONG v. BACKUS, COMMISSIONER OF IMMIGRATION FOR THE PORT OF SAN FRANCISCO. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 664. Argued April 5, 6, 1916. Decided April 17, 1916. Where the
Huff v. United States
No. 917. Franklin Huff et al., Petitioners, v. The United States. April 10, 1916. Mr. C. L. Bartlett, Mr. Marion Smith, Mr. John D. Little, Mr. Arthur G. Powell and Mr. M. F. Goldstein for the petitioners. The Attorney General, The Solicito
Hise v. Western Coal & Mining Co.
No. 583. Helen Hise et al., Petitioners, v. Western Coal & Mining Company. April 10, 1916. Mr. John H. Vaughn for the petitioners. Mr.' Edward J. White and. Mr. Thomas B. Pryor for the respondent.
Filler v. Steele
No. 731. H. E. Filler, Appellant, v. Ben Steele, Sheriff, etc. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Pennsylvania. Argued April 5, 1916. Decided April 10, 1916.
Fairbanks Steam Shovel Co. v. Wills
FAIRBANKS STEAM SHOVEL COMPANY v. WILLS, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY OF FEDERAL CONTRACTING COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 82. Argued December 2, 3, 1915. Decided April 10, 1916. A corporation organ
Southern Railway Co. v. Prescott
SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. PRESCOTT. ERROR‘TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP SOUTH CAROLINA. No. 358. Argued February 23, 1916. Decided April 10, 1916. Whether the contract based on a bill of lading of an interstate shipment issued purs
Bullen v. Wisconsin
BULLEN v. STATE OF WISCONSIN. ERROR TO THE COUNTY COURT OF WAUKESHA COUNTY, STATE OF WISCONSIN. No. 262. Argued March 8, Decided April 10, 1916. A deed made by a resident of one State to a person of another State as trustee for certain bene
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.