Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1916 Cases
296 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Glass v. Woodman
No. 721. David H. Glass, Appellant, v. Alfred H. Woodman et al. Appeal from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Motion to dismiss or affirm and petition for writ of certiorari submitted March 13, 1916. Decided
Farmers & Merchants State Bank v. Park
No. 108. Farmers & Merchants State Bank of Waco, Appellant, v. M. C. H. Park, Trustee of the Slayden-Kirksey Woolen Mill, Bankrupt. Appeal from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Submitted March 16, 1916. Deci
Johnson v. Riddle
JOHNSON v. RIDDLE. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA. No. 161. Argued January 12, 1916. Decided March 20, 1916. Under the provisions relating to town sites, in the Atoka Agreement bfetween the United States and the Choctaw
Great Northern Railway Co. v. Knapp
GREAT NORTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. KNAPP. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. No. 690. Argued February 24, 1916. Decided March 20, 1916. Where there is no question. as to the interpretation of the Employers’ Liability Act o
Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. City of Akron
CUYAHOGA RIVER POWER COMPANY v. CITY OF AKRON. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT' OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. No. 465. Argued October 20, 1915. Decided March 20, 1916. As the bill in this case states that a municipa
Southern Wisconsin Railway Co. v. City of Madison
SOUTHERN WISCONSIN RAILWAY COMPANY v. CITY OF MADISON. ERROR TO THE'SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WISCONSIN. No. 260. Argued March 6, 7, 1916. Decided March 20, 1916. Although the charter of a railway company was held,in this case to be a c
Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Bond
CHICAGO, ROCK ISLAND & PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. BOND, ADMINISTRATOR OF TURNER. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP OKLAHOMA. No. 486. Argued February 23, 1916. Decided March 20, 1916. One who is not an employé of an interstate carr
Great Northern Railway Co. v. Wiles
GREAT NORTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. WILES, ADMINISTRATOR. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP MIN- ’ NESOTA. No. 196. Submitted January 26, 1916. Decided March 20, 1916. Where there is nothing to extenuate the negligence of .the employ
United States v. United States Steel Corp.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION. APPEAL FROM .-THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES ' FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. No.-. Application submitted March 14, 1916. Decided March 20, 1916. This ease having been c
Harmon v. Brown
No. 738. Judson Harmon, Receiver, etc., Plaintiff in Error, v. Andrew C. Brown, Administrator, etc. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Indiana. March 17, 1916. Mr. John B. Elam for the plaintiff in error. Mr. James E. Watson for
Hitchman Coal & Coke Co. v. Mitchell
No. 241. Hitchman Coal & Coke Company, Appellant and Petitioner, v. John Mitchell, Individually, et al. . Appeal from and petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Argued March 2
Pecos & Northern Texas Railway Co. v. Rosenbloom
PECOS & NORTHERN TEXAS RAILWAY COMPANY v. ROSENBLOOM. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP TEXAS. No. 613. Submitted February 24, 1916. Decided March 13, 1916. If an employé of an interstate carrier is employed in interstate commerce
Carey v. Donohue
CAREY v. DONOHUE, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY OF HUMPHREYS. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS FOR THE . SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 179. Argued January 17, 1916. Decided March 13, 1916. The reference to the requirement for record in § 60 of the Ban
Eaton v. Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Co.
EATON, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY OF LUKE, v. BOSTON SAFE DEPOSIT AND TRUST COMPANY, TRUSTEE OF LEIGHTON. error to the supreme court op the state op MASSACHUSETTS'. No. 466. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted February 28, 1916. Decided March
National Surety Co. v. United States ex rel. Hollinger
No. 267. National Surety Company et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. The United States to the use of J. A. Hollinger et al. • In error to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. March 6, 1916. Mr. A. C. Stamm for the p
Tubular Woven Fabric Co. v. National Metal Molding Co.
No. 871. Tubular Woven Fabric Company, Petitioner, v. National Metal Molding Company. March 6, 1916. Mr. William Quiriby, Mr. F..W. Lehmann, Mr. Frank Y. Gladney, Mr. Livingston Gifford and Mr. Peter G. Gerry for the petitioner. Mr. Charles
Martin v. Commercial National Bank
No. 839. W. E. Martin, Jr., Trustee, etc., Petitioner, v. Commercial National Bank of Macon, Ga. March 6, 1916. Mr. Rudolph 8. Wimberly for the petitioner. Mr. George S. Jones and Mr. Orville A. Park for the respondent.
Hanover Star Milling Co. v. Metcalf
HANOVER STAR MILLING COMPANY v. METCALF. ALLEN & WHEELER COMPANY v. HANOVER STAR MILLING COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. APPEAL FROM AND CERTIORARI TO THE. CIRGÜIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH
Causey v. United States
CAUSEY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 197. Argued January 26, 1916. Decided March 6, 1916. The rule, that findings of fact concurred in by the Master and both ' courts below should not be distu
Illinois Central Railroad v. Messina
ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY v. MESSINA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI. ’ No. 535. Argued February 23, 1916. Decided March 6, 1916. While the Anti-pass Provision of the Hepburn Act of 1906 may have . had more f
Badders v. United States
BADDERS v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS. No. 521. Argued February 23, 24, 1916. Decided March 6, 1916. Congress has power to regulate the overt .act' of putting a letter into the
Pitney v. Washington
PITNEY v. STATE OF WASHINGTON. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP WASHINGTON. No. 242. Argued October 29, November 1, 2, 1915. Decided March 6, 1916. On authority of Rast v. Van Deman & Lewis Co., ante, p. 342, and Tanner v. Little,
Tanner v. Little
TANNER, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, v. LITTLE. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE. EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON. No. 224. Argued October 29, November 1, 2, 1915. Decided March 6, 1916. Rast v. Van
Rast v. Van Deman & Lewis Co.
RAST, TAX COLLECTOR FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA, v. VAN DEMAN & LEWIS COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COUF.T OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. No. 41. Argued October 29, November 1, 2, 1915. Decided March 6, 1916. I
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.