Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1916 Cases
296 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Hostetter
BALTIMORE AND OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY v. HOSTETTER. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MARION COUNTY, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA. No. 245. Submitted January 25, 1916. Decided April 10, 1916. The wages of an employee residing in West Virginia having be
Judson v. Nash
No. 276. Lucius E. Judson, as Trustee, etc., Petitioner, v. William A. Nash, as Trustee, etc., et al. On writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. April 3, 1916. Mr. Oscar A. Lewis for the peti
Johnson v. Louisville Woolen Mills
No. 901. C. W. Johnson, Trustee, etc., Petitioner, v. Louisville Woolen Mills. April 3, 1916. Mr. David A. Sachs and Mr. David A. Sachs, Jr., for the petitioner. Mr. Keith L. Bullitt for the respondent.
North Carolina v. Tennessee
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. STATE OF TENNESSEE. IN EQUITY. No. 4, Original. Decree; entered April 3, 1916. Decree embodying report of Comissioners and establishing Slick Rock Basin and Tellico Basin sections of the boundary between the State
State of Georgia v. Tennessee Copper Co.
STATE OF GEORGIA v. TENNESSEE COPPER COMPANY AND THE DUCKTOWN SULPHUR, COPPER AND IRON COMPANY, LIMITED. IN EQUITY. No. 1, Original. Decree, entered April 3, 1916. Ordered to be entered, and former decrees modified as to escapement of fumes
Varner v. New Hampshire Savings Bank
VARNER v. NEW HAMPSHIRE SAVINGS BANK. HAINES TILE & MANTEL COMPANY v. SAME. JACKSON-WALKER COAL & MATERIAL COMPANY v. SAME. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. Nos. 264, 265, 266. Argued March 8, 9, 1916. Decid
Southern Express Co. v. Byers
SOUTHERN EXPRESS COMPANY v. BYERS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. 201. Submitted March 2, 1916. Decided April 3, 1916. Rights and liabilities in connection with interstate shipments depend upon acts of Congre
United States v. Union Manufacturing Co.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. UNION MANUFACTURING COMPANY. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. No. 628. Argued February 28, 1916. Decided April 3, 1916. The' offense of false billing and repr
Uterhart v. United States
UTERHART, TRUSTEE OF STEIN, v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 214. Argued January 24, 1916. Decided April 3, 1916. The right to succeed to property of a decedent depends upon, and is regulated by, state law. Knowlton v.
Pinel v. Pinel
PINEL v. PINEL. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN.. No. 181. Argued January 17, 1916. Decided April 3, 1916. When two or more plaintiffs having separate and. distinct demands unite in a
Central Trust Co. v. Chicago Auditorium Ass'n
CENTRAL TRUST COMPANY OF ILLINOIS, TRUSTEE OF FRANK E. SCOTT TRANSFER COMPANY, BANKRUPT, v. CHICAGO AUDITORIUM ASSOCIATION. CHICAGO AUDITORIUM ASSOCIATION v. CENTRAL TRUST COMPANY, TRUSTEE, &c. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR T
Willink v. United States
WILLINK, EXECUTRIX, v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 180. Argued January 21, 1916. Decided April 3, 1916. The mere location by the Secretary of War of a harbor line does not amount to a taking of property within the li
Detroit & Mackinac Railway Co. v. Michigan Railroad Commission
DETROIT AND MACKINAC RAILWAY COMPANY v. MICHIGAN RAILROAD COMMISSION AND FLETCHER PAPER COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP MICHIGAN. No. 68. Argued November 10, 1915. Decided April 3, 1916. A judgment or decree which determ
Jones National Bank v. Yates
JONES NATIONAL BANK v. YATES. BANK OF STAPLEHURST v. SAME. UTICA BANK v. SAME. BAILEY v. SAME. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP NEBRASKA. Nos. 163, 164, 165, 166. Argued April 5, 1915. Restored to docket for reargument June 21, 19
Farnham v. United States
FARNHAM v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP'CLAIMS. No. 107. Argued March 2, 1916. Decided April 3, 1916. Where the officers of the United States charged with the matter have refused the offer of a patentee for the use of his inventi
Ackerlind v. United States
ACKERLIND, ADMINISTRATOR OF LIND, v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 293. Argued March 15, 1916. Decided April 3, 1916. Notwithstanding the requirements of § 3744, Rev. Stat.,- requiring contracts made by the Secretaries
Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. Oklahoma
INDIAN TERRITORY ILLUMINATING OIL COMPANY v. STATE OF OKLAHOMA. pRROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP OKLAHOMA. No. 283. Argued March 14, 1916. Decided April 3, 1916. A tax upon a lease made is a tax upon the power to make the lease. L
St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Arkansas
ST. LOUIS, IRON MOUNTAIN & SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. STATE OF ARKANSAS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP ARKANSAS. No. 302. Argued March 17, 1916. Decided April 3, 1916. Legislation cannot be-all-comprehensive, and police statut
Armour & Co. v. North Dakota
ARMOUR & COMPANY v. STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA. No. 258. Argued March 3, 6, 1916. Decided April 3, 1916. The statute of North Dakota requiring lard when not sold in bulle to be pub up in-
Farmers' & Mechanics' National Bank v. Ridge Avenue Bank
FARMERS’ & MECHANICS’ NATIONAL BANK OF PHILADELPHIA v. RIDGE AVENUE BANK. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 291. Argued March 15, 1916. Decided April 3, 1916. Under subsection f of § 5 of the Bankruptc
Seaboard Air Line Railway v. Kenney
SEABOARD AIR LINE RAILWAY v. KENNEY, ADMINISTRATOR OF CAPEHART, ALIAS EASON. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. 269. Argued March 10, 1916. Decided April 3, 1916. The Federal Employers’ Liability Act, in so far a
Barlow v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.
BARLOW v. NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY. error to the supreme court of the state of north DAKOTA. No. 257. Argued March 3, 1916. Decided April 3, 1916. Under the Right of Way Act of March 3, 1875, e. 152, 18 Stat. 482, the rights of a ra
Weeks v. United States
No. 870. Oscar J. Weeks, etc., Petitioner, v. The United States. March 20, 1916. Mr. Walter Jeffreys Carlin for the petitioner. The Attorney General and The Solicitor General for the respondent.
Ex parte Bukva
No. —. Original. Ex parte: In the Matter of Paul Bukva, Petitioner. Submitted March 13, 1916. Decided March 20, 1916. Mr. William Wilhelm for the petitioner.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.