Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1918 Cases
299 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Houston Oil Co. v. Goodrich
HOUSTON OIL COMPANY OF TEXAS ET AL. v. GOODRICH ET AL. CERTIORARI to the circuit court of appeals for the FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 76. Argued November 21, 22, 1917. Decided January 7, 1918. A writ of certiorari, if improvidently granted,- will be
United States v. J. S. Stearns Lumber Co.
UNITED STATES v. J. S. STEARNS LUMBER COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. No. 94. Argued December 18, 1917. Decided January 7, 1918. By the treaty of 1842, proclaimed in 1843,
Wisconsin v. Lane
STATE OF WISCONSIN v. LANE, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR. IN EQUITY. No. 7, Original. Argued December 11, 1917. Decided January 7, 1918. The grant of sections numbered 16, for school purposes, made by § 7 of the Enabling Act of August 6,1846,
Towne v. Eisner
TOWNE v. EISNER, COLLECTOR OF UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE FOR THE THIRD DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 563. Argued December 12, 1917. Decided
Union Trust Co. v. Grosman
UNION TRUST COMPANY v. GROSMAN ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 106. Argued December 20, 21, 1917. Decided January 7, 1918. While a husband and wife, domiciled in Texas, were temporarily in Illino
Waller v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.
WALLER ET AL., TRUSTEES (UNDER THE LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT) OF WALLER, v. TEXAS & PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 92. Argued December 17, 1917. Decided January 7, 1918. Plaintiff
United States v. Morena
UNITED STATES v. MORENA. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 523. Argued December 13, 1917. Decided January 7, 1918. The second proviso in § 8 of the Naturalization Act of June 29, 1906, c. 3592, 34 Stat.
Jones v. Perkins
JONES v. PERKINS, DEPUTY UNITED STATES MARSHAL, ET AL. APEEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR. THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA. No. 738. Argued December 13, 14, 1917. Decided January 7, 1918. Petitioner sought habeas corpu
Selective Draft Law Cases
SELECTIVE DRAFT LAW CASES. ERROR TO THE ..DISTRICT COURTS OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA AND THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Nos. 663, 664, 665, 666, 681, 769. Argued December 13, 14, 1917. Decided January 7, 1918. Th
Illinois Central Railroad v. Anderson
No. 109. Illinois Central Railroad Company et al. v. L. A. Anderson.
Bryan v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad
No. 810. Edward Jefferson Bryan, Plaintiff in Error, v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.