Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1918 Cases
299 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Anicker v. Gunsburg
ANICKER v. GUNSBURG ET AL., ADMINISTRATORS OF GUNSBURG, ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 164. Argued January 28, 1918. Decided March 4, 1918. An oil and gas lease of the restricted land of a Creek
Talley v. Burgess
TALLEY v. BURGESS ET AL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA. No. 157. Argued January 25, 1918. Decided March 4, 1918. The Cherokee Agreement of July 1,1902, c. 1375,32 Stat. 716, imposed no restriction, other than that of m
Eiger v. Garrity
EIGER ET AL. v. GARRITY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP ILLINOIS. No. 143. Argued January 22, 23, 1918. Decided March 4, 1918. A state statute giving a wife a right of action against any person who injures her means of support b
Brader v. James
BRADER v. JAMES, FORMERLY REEVES. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA. No. 126. Argued January 7, 8, 1918. Decided March 4, 1918. Under the Supplemental Agreement' with the Choctaws and Chickasaws of July 1, 1902, c. 1362, 3
People's Tobacco Co. v. American Tobacco Co.
PEOPLE’S TOBACCO COMPANY, LIMITED, v. AMERICAN TOBACCO COMPANY. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. No. 124. Argued January 4, 7, 1918. Decided .March 4, 1918. As applied to a corporation
Krueger v. United States
KRUEGER v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 111. Submitted December 20, 1917. Decided March 4, 1918. Land, part of an odd-numbered section within the primary limits, but covered by a valid
Municipal Securities Corp. v. Kansas City
MUNICIPAL SECURITIES CORPORATION v. KANSAS CITY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF .MISSOURI. No. 56. Argued November 15, 16, 1917. Decided March 4, 1918. If the decision of the state court rests upon a ground of general law adequa
Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Texas
GULF, COLORADO & SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY v. STATE OF TEXAS. ERROR TO THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS, THIRD SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT, OF THE STATE OF TEXAS. No. 158. Argued January 25, 1918. Decided March 4, 1918. An order of a state commissio
Marconi Wireless Telegraph Co. of America v. Simon
MARCONI WIRELESS TELEGRAPH COMPANY OF AMERICA v. SIMON. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 168. Argued January 29, 1918. Decided March 4, 1918. The Navy Department accepted respondent’s proposal to furnis
William Cramp & Sons Ship & Engine Building Co. v. International Curtis Marine Turbine Co.
WILLIAM CRAMP & SONS SHIP & ENGINE BUILDING COMPANY v. INTERNATIONAL CURTIS MARINE TURBINE COMPANY ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 393. Argued January 29, 30, 1918. Decided March 4, 1918. The Act
Boston Store v. American Graphophone Co.
BOSTON STORE OF CHICAGO v. AMERICAN GRAPHOPHONE COMPANY ET AL. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 363. Argued January 16, 1918. Decided March 4, 1918. Certificates of the facts constituting the basis
Armour & Co. v. Virginia
ARMOUR & COMPANY v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP APPEALS OF THE STATE OF VIRGINIA. No. 127. Argued January 3, 1918. Decided March 4, 1918. A law of Virginia (Acts 1915, c. 148, p. 233) imposes a license tax on mer
El Paso Sash & Door Co. v. Carraway
No. 369. El Paso Sash and Door Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. E. M. Carraway. In error to the Court of Civil Appeals for the Eighth Supreme Judicial District of the State of Texas. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted January 28, 1918. De
Weeks v. United States
WEEKS, DOING BUSINESS UNDER THE NAME OF O. J. WEEKS & COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 109. Submitted January 2, 1918. Decided February 4, 1918. The Food and Drugs Act of June
Stellwagen v. Clum
STELLWAGEN, TRUSTEE FOR ZENGERLE, v. CLUM, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY OF GEORGIAN BAY COMPANY. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 89. Argued December 14, 1917. Decided February 4, 1918. The Bankruptcy . Act
Gardiner v. William S. Butler & Co.
GARDINER, TRUSTEE OF THE PERRY REAL ESTATE TRUST, v. WILLIAM S. BUTLER & COMPANY, INCORPORATED, ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT. No. 95. Argued December 18, 1917. Decided February. 4, 1918. Following
William Filene's Sons Co. v. Weed
WILLIAM FILENE’S SONS COMPANY v. WEED ET AL., RECEIVERS OF WILLIAM S. BUTLER & COMPANY, INC. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE' FIRST CIRCUIT. No. 93. Argued December 17, 18, 1917. Decided February 4, 1918. Kent issues from
Stonebraker-Zea Co. v. United States
No. 84. Stonebraker-Zea Company, Appellant, v. United States. Appeal from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Submitted January 23, 1918. Decided January 28, 1918. Mr. Henry B. Martin for appellant. Mr. Assist
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Cole
No. 153. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Paul D. Cole. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Kansas. Argued January 24, 1918. Decided January 28, 1918. Mr. Alfred A. Scott, Mr. Robert Dunlap and M
Supreme Lodge Knights of Pythias v. Smyth
SUPREME LODGE KNIGHTS OF PYTHIAS v. SMYTH. APPEAL FEOM THE CIRCUIT COUET OF APPEALS FOE 'THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 107. Argued January 2, 1918. Decided January 28, 1918. The appellant had the right to increase the assessment upon the insuranc
Northern Ohio Traction & Light Co. v. Ohio ex rel. Pontius
NORTHERN OHIO TRACTION & LIGHT COMPANY ET AL. v. STATE OF OHIO ON THE RELATION OF PONTIUS, PROSECUTING ATTORNEY OF STARK COUNTY, OHIO. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OHIO. No. 60. Argued October 18, 19, 1917. Decided January 28,
United States v. Sweet
UNITED STATES v. SWEET, ADMINISTRATOR OF SWEET. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 99. Argued December 19, 1917. Decided January 28, 1918. Section 6 of the Utah Enabling Act of July 16, 1894, c. 138, 28 Sta
Southern Pacific Co. v. Stewart
SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY v. STEWART. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 348. Petition for rehearing. Granted and former dismissal vacated January 28, 1918. The dismissal (ante, 359), having resulted from a misu
Greer v. United States
GREER v. UNITED STATES. certiorari to the circuit court of appeals for the EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 504. Argued January 18, 1918. Decided January 28, 1918. There is no presumption in a criminal case that the accused is of good character. A presu
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.