Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1918 Cases
299 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
In re Sylvester
No. —. Original. Ex parte: In the Matter of Sam Sylvester, Petitioner. Submitted December 16, 1918. Decided December 23, 1918. Mr.. Harold O. Mulks for petitioner.
Sears v. Inhabitants of Nahant
No. 61. Frederick R. Sears et al. v. Inhabitants of the Town of Nahant, etc. Error to the Superior Court of the State of Massáchusetts. Argued December 16, 1918. Decided December 23, 1918. Mr. Burton E. Eames for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Ro
Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co.
No. 525. Western Union Telegraph Company v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Company. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted December 16, 1918. Decided December 23, 19
Georgia State Board of Examiners of Optometry v. Mott
No. 576. Georgia State Board of Examiners of Optometry et al. v. Kennon Mott. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Georgia. Motion to dismiss submitted December 16, 1918. Decided December 23, 1918. Mr. James K. Hines for plaintiffs in
International News Service v. Associated Press
INTERNATIONAL NEWS SERVICE v. THE ASSOCIATED PRESS. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 221. Argued May 2, 3, 1918. Decided December 23, 1918. An incorporated association of proprietors and representatives
Neilson v. Rhine Shipping Co.
NEILSON ET AL. v. RHINE SHIPPING COMPANY, CLAIMANT OF THE SAILING SHIP “RHINE.” HARDY ET AL. v. SHEPARD & MORSE LUMBER COMPANY, CLAIMANT OF THE BARKENTINE “WINDRUSH.” CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. Nos. 3
Sandberg v. McDonald
SANDBERG ET AL. v. McDONALD, CLAIMANT OF THE BRITISH SHIP "TALUS.” CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 392. Argued November 5, 1918. Decided December 23, 1918. Spction 11 of the Seaman’s Act of 1915, c. 153
Dillon v. Strathearn Steamship Co.
DILLON v. STRATHEARN STEAMSHIP COMPANY, CLAIMANT OF STEAMSHIP “STRATHEARN.” .CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 361. Argued November 5, 1918. Decided December 23, 1918. , A certificate under Jud. Code,
Cleveland-Cliffs Iron Co. v. Artic Iron Co.
CLEVELAND-CLIFFS IRON COMPANY ET AL. v. ARCTIC IRON COMPANY. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 75. Argued November 22, 1918. Decided December 23, 1918. A certificate from the Circuit Court of Appeals c
Milner v. United States
No. 81. Truth A. Milner, Executrix, etc., et al., v. United States. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. December 16, 1918. Mr. Adrian C. Ellis, Jr., and Mr. William C. Prentiss for appellants.
Richland Steamship Co. v. Buffalo Dry Dock Co.
No. 769. Richland Steamship Company v. Buffalo Dry Dock Company. December 16, 1918. Mr. Harvey D. Goulder and Mr. Thomas H. Garry for petitioner. Mr. Thomas C. Burke, Mr. Herman A. Kelley and Mr. George W. Cottrell for respondent.
Ferguson v. Babcock Lumber & Land Co.
No. 630. J. W. Ferguson et al. v. Babcock Lumber & Land Company. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted December 9, 1918. Decided December 16, 1918. Mr. Mark W. Brown and Mr. F
Campbell v. Wadsworth
CAMPBELL v. WADSWORTH ET AL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA. No. 72. Argued November 21, 1918. Decided December 16, 1918. The Seminole Agreement of October 7, 1899, 31 Stat. 250, provides for enrollment by the Commissio
Wells, Fargo & Co. v. Nevada
WELLS, FARGO & COMPANY v. STATE OF NEVADA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE .STATE OP NEVADA. No. 40. Argued November 14, 1918. Decided December 16, 1918. Under a Nevada law providing only for an ad valorem tax on property, a state board v
Monroe Building Co. v. Lawhead
No. 725. Monroe Building Company et al. v. Frank Lawhead, Trustee, etc. December 9, 1918. Mr. Harrison Geer and Mr. Max Kahn for petitioners. Mr. George E. Brand for respondent.
Snyder v. King County
No. 70. Mrs. Rose Snyder v. King County, Washington, et al. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Washington. Argued for plaintiff in error November 20, 1918. Decided December 9, 1918. Mr. G. Wright Arnold. with whom Mr. Dallas V. Halv
Pure Oil Co. v. Minnesota
PURE OIL COMPANY v. STATE OF MINNESOTA. ERROR Tp THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. No. 74. Argued November 21, 22, 1918. Decided December 9, 1918. For the purpose of promoting the public safety and of protecting the public from f
Petrie v. Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District
PETRIE ET AL. v. NAMPA AND MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT. ERROR TO THE 'SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OF IDAHO. No. 47. Argued November 19, 1918. Decided December 9, 1918. Upon an.application to an Idaho court for approval of a proposed contrac
MacMath v. United States
MacMATH, ADMINISTRATRIX OF MacMATH, v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 79. Argued November 22, 1918. Decided December 9, 1918. Revised Statutes, §2621, authorizes Collectors to.employ, with the approval of the Secretary
Luckenbach v. W. J. McCahan Sugar Refining Co.
LUCKENBACH ET AL. v. W. J. McCAHAN SUGAR REFINING COMPANY AND THE INSULAR LINE. CEKTTOEAKI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF .APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 51. Argued November 18, 1918. Decided December 9, 1918. Where the bills of lading stipul
United States v. Spearin
UNITED STATES v. SPEARIN. SPEARIN v. UNITED STATES. APPEALS FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. Nos. 44, 45. Argued November 14, 15, 1918. Decided December 9, 1918. S agreed, for a lump sum, to build a dry-dock in a Navy Yard in accordance with plans
Tempel v. United States
TEMPEL v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 29. Argued November 5, 1917. Decided December 9, 1918. Ndt knowing that certain land on the Chicago River had become submer
Iowa v. Slimmer
STATE OF IOWA v. SLIMMER ET AL. MOTION. FOR LEAVE TO FILE BILL OF COMPLAINT. No. —, Original. Argued April 15, 1918. Decided December 9, 1918. A motion to file an original "bill will be denied when the- complaining State is clearly not enti
Nicoulin v. O'Brien
NICOULIN v. O’BRIEN. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KENTUCKY, No. 113. Submitted October 21, 1918. Decided December 9, 1918. •The territorial limits of Kentucky extend across the Ohio River- to low-water mark on the Indiana s
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.