Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1919 Cases
301 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Brothers v. United States
BROTHERS v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 309. Argued' March 28, 1919. Decided May 19, 1919. An unliquidated claim against the United States, under the Act of . June 25, 1910, c. 423, 36 Stat. 851, for the alleged infr
New York Central Railroad v. Goldberg
NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY v. GOLDBERG. certiorari to the supreme court op the state op NEW YORK. No. 256. Argued March 20, 1919. Decided May 19, 1919. Under an interstate bill of lading providing that the owner or consignee shall pa
Fillippon v. Albion Vein Slate Co.
FILLIPPON v. ALBION VEIN SLATE COMPANY. certiorari to the circuit court of appeals FOR THE third' circuit. No. 241. Argued March' 18, 1919. Decided May 19, 1919. In response to an inquiry from the jury, who had retired to consider of their
Rust Land & Lumber Co. v. Jackson
RUST LAND & LUMBER COMPANY v. JACKSON ET AL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP MISSISSIPPI. No. 171. Argued March 4, 1919. Decided May 19, 1919. The contention that an issue between private parties involving the location of the sta
Parker v. Riley
PARKER, AS SUPERINTENDENT FOR THE FIVE CIVILIZED TRIBES, ET AL. v. RILEY, A MINOR, BY STOCKTON, HER GUARDIAN, ET AL. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 254. Submitted March 19, 1919. Decided May 19 1919. Un
Kenny v. Miles
KENNY v. MILES ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE' OP OKLAHOMA. No. 179. Argued January 24, 1919. Decided May 19, 1919. Subject to the provisions as to certificates of competency, lands allotted as homestead and surplus res
Ball Engineering Co. v. J. G. White & Co.
BALL ENGINEERING COMPANY v. J. G. WHITE & COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 227. Argued- March 13, 1919. Decided May 19, 1919. A provision in a construction contract that in case of annulment ■
Sage v. United States
SAGE ET AL., EXECUTORS OF SAGE, v. A UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 344. Argued April 29, 1919. Decided May 19, 1919. A suit against a collector of internal revenue to recover mofaey wrongfully collected as taxes is per
Coleman v. United States
COLEMAN, SURVIVING ADMINISTRATRIX OF COLEMAN, v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 343. Argued April 29, 1919. Decided May 19, 1919. A tax demanded and paid under § 29 of the War Revenue Act of June 13, 1898, c. 448, 30 St
Joseph Schlitz Brewing Co. v. Houston Ice & Brewing Co.
JOSEPH SCHLITZ BREWING COMPANY v. HOUSTON ICE & BREWING COMPANY ET AL. .CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 326. Submitted.April 24, 1919. Decided May 19, 1919. A manufacturer of beer cannot claim the exclu
Tayabas Land Co. v. Manila Railroad
TAYABAS LAND COMPANY, ASSIGNEE AND SUCCESSOR OF VELASQUEZ ET AL., v. MANILA RAILROAD COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS. No. 331. Argued April 25, 1919. Decided May 19, 1919. Under §§ 246, 273, 496 and 497 of the
Caldwell v. United States
CALDWELL ET AL., COPARTNERS, TRADING AS CALDWELL & DUNWODY, v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 325. Submitted April 23, 1919. Decided May 19, 1919. The provision of the General Railroad Right of Way Act of March 3, 1875,
American Fire Insurance v. King Lumber & Manufacturing Co.
AMERICAN FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY v. KING LUMBER & MANUFACTURING COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. No. 308. Argued April 22, 1919. Decided May 19, 1919. A fire insurance company transacting business in a State other
Portsmouth Harbor Land & Hotel Co. v. United States
PORTSMOUTH HARBOR LAND & HOTEL COMPANY ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 381. Argued May 1, 1919. Decided May 19, 1919. Additional discharges of projectiles over part of plaintiff’s land, held not to involve a ta
Union Sulphur Co. v. Freeport Texas Co.
No. 993. Union Sulphur Company v. Freeport Texas Company. May 5, 1919. Mr. Charles Neave and Mr. Frederick P. Fish for petitioner. Mr. Elihu Root, Mr. Livingston Gifford, Mr. Samuel R. Beits, Mr. James R. Sheffield .and Mr. Joseph C. Fraley
Venner v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad
No. 984. Clarence H. Venner, etc., v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company et al. May 5, 1919. Mr. Elijah N: Zoline for petitioner. Mr. Walter C. Noyes for respondent.
Mississippi Central Railroad v. Lott
No. 956. Mississippi Central Railroad Company v. Laura Lott, Administratrix, etc. May 5, 1919. Mr. S. E. Trdvis for petitioner. No appearance for respondent.
Ex parte Meccano, Ltd.
No. —, Original. Ex parte: In the Matter of Meccano, Limited, Petitioner. Submitted May 1, 1919. Decided May 5, 1919. Mr. Reeve Lewis for petitioner.
Louisiana Western Railroad v. City of Crowley
No. 359. Louisiana Western Railroad Company v. City of Crowley. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana. Submitted April 29, 1919. Decided May 5, 1919. Mr. George Denegre, Mr. Victor Leovy, Mr. Philip S. Pugh and Mrx Henry H. C
Standard Computing Scale Co. v. Farrell
STANDARD COMPUTING SCALE COMPANY, LIMITED, v. FARRELL, AS STATE SUPERINTENDENT OF WEIGHTS AND MEASURES OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 228. Argued Marc
Skinner & Eddy Corp. v. United States
SKINNER & EDDY CORPORATION v. UNITED STATES ET AL. Appeal from the district court of the united states FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON. No. 215. Argued March 11, 1919. Decided May 5, 1919. Where a suit to enjoin the enforcement of an. order of t
Beaumont v. Prieto
BEAUMONT, ASSIGNEE OF BORCK, v. PRIETO ET AL., ADMINISTRATORS OF LEGARDA, ET AL. APPEAL FROM AND ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS. No. 303. Argued April 17, 1919. Decided May 5, 1919. In the interest of justice the court
Raton Water Works Co. v. City of Raton
RATON WATER WORKS COMPANY v. CITY OF RATON. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 348. Argued April 29, 30, 1919. Decided May 5, 1919. When diverse citizenship is absent and the jurisdiction of the Distri
Berlin Mills Co. v. Procter & Gamble Co.
No. 964. Berlin Mills Company, v. Procter & Gamble Company. April 28, 1919. Mr. Marcus B. May, Mr. John C. Rennie and Mr. Melville, Church for petitioner. Mr. Livingston Gifford, Mr. Thomas B. Kerr and Mr. John H. Brickenstein for responden
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.