Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1920 Cases
281 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Archer v. United States
No. 125. Kate C. Archer, Administratrix of George F. Archer, Deceased, et al. v. United States; and United States v. Kate C. Archer, Administratrix of George F. Archer, Deceased, et al. No. 220. Appeals from the Court of Claims. Argued Janu
Missouri ex rel. City of Sedalia v. Public Service Commission
No. 215. State of Missouri at the Relation of City of Sedalia v. Public Service Commission of Missouri, etc., et al. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Missouri. Submitted January 30, 1920. Decided March 1, 1920.
Fort Smith Lumber Co. v. Arkansas ex rel. Arbuckle
FORT SMITH LUMBER COMPANY v. STATE OF ARKANSAS EX REL. ARBUCKLE, ATTORNEY GENERAL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME .COURT OF THE STATE OF ARKANSAS. No. 394. Submitted January 5, 1920. — Decided March 1, 1920. 'Double taxation is not forbidden by the F
Bates v. Dresser
BATES, RECEIVER OF THE NATIONAL CITY BANK OF CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS, v. DRESSER, ADMINISTRATOR OF DRESSER. DRESSER, ADMINISTRATOR OF DRESSER, v. BATES, RECEIVER OF THE NATIONAL CITY BANK OF CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS. BATES, RECEIVER OF THE
The South Coast
THE SOUTH COAST. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 68. Submitted November 10, 1919. — Decided March 1, 1920. In purchasing necessary supplies, the master of a demised vessel, appointed by the owner but un
Dunbar v. City of New York
DUNBAR v. CITY OF NEW YORK. EBBOB TO THE SUPEEME COUBT OP THE STATE OP NEW YOBK. No. 160. Argued January 21, 1920. — Decided March 1, 1920. The owner of a building in New York City demised it to tenants who in breach of their covenant faile
Forged Steel Wheel Co. v. Lewellyn
FORGED STEEL WHEEL COMPANY v. LEWELLYN, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE FOR THE TWENTY-THIRD DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 526. Argued January 8, 9, 1920. — Decided March 1, 19
Worth Bros. v. Lederer
WORTH BROTHERS COMPANY v. LEDERER, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 525. Argued January 8, 9, 1920. — Decided March 1, 1920. Rough sh
Carbon Steel Co. v. Lewellyn
CARBON STEEL COMPANY v. LEWELLYN, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE FOR THE TWENTY-THIRD DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 535. Argued January 12, 1920. — Decided March 1, 1920. The
Schaefer v. United States
SCHAEFER v. UNITED STATES. VOGEL v. UNITED STATES. WERNER v. UNITED STATES. DARKOW v. UNITED STATES. LEMKE v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. Nos. 270-274. Argued Oct
United States v. United States Steel Corp.
UNITED STATES v. UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION ET AL. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE DISTRICT OP NEW JERSEY.- No. 6. Argued March 9, 12-14,1917; restored to docket for reargument May 21,1917; reargued October
United States v. Thompson
UNITED STATES v. THOMPSON. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 250. Argued January 27, 28, 1920. — Decided March 1, 1920. A judgment of the District Court sustaining a so-called mot
Board of Public Utility Commissioners v. Ynchausti & Co.
BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSIONERS v. YNCHAUSTI & COMPANY ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS^ No. 190. Argued January 27, 1920. — Decided March 1, 1920. Acceptance of a license from the Philippine Government
Ex parte Broussard
No. —, Original. Ex parte: In the Matter of J. E. Broussard et al., Petitioners. Submitted January 26, 1920. Decided February 2, 1920.
Brooks-Scanlon Co. v. Railroad Commission
BROOKS-SCANLON COMPANY v. RAILROAD COMMISSION OF LOUISIANA. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OP LOUISIANA. No. 386. Argued January 6, 1920. — Decided February 2, 1920. A common carrier cannot, under the Fourteenth Amendment, be
Henry v. United States
HENRY, EXECUTOR OF HENDRICKS, v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 162. Argued January 21, 1920. — Decided February 2, 1920. A legacy paid over by the executor to the legatee, or to himself as trustee under the will for an
Jones v. Hiltscher
No. 181. Gertrude Minnie Jones v. Max Hiltscher. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of New Mexico. Argued January 23, 1920. Decided January 26, 1920.
V. & S. Bottle Co. v. Mountain Gas Co.
No. 176. V. & S. Bottle Company v. Mountain Gas Company. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Pennsylvania. Argued January 23, 1920. Decided January 26, 1920.
Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States
SILVERTHORNE LUMBER COMPANY, INC., ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 358. Argued December 12, 1919. — Decided January 26, 1920. The Fourth Amendment protects
Rex v. United States
REX, ADMINISTRATRIX OF IVIE, v. UNITED STATES AND UTE INDIANS. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 126. Argued January 13, 1920. — Decided January 26, 1920. The primary intent of the Act of January 11, 1915, c. 7, 38 Stat. 791, amending th
Ex parte Bishop
No. —, Original. Ex parte: In the Matter of James F. Bishop, Administrator, etc., Petitioner. Submitted January 12, 1920. Decided January 19, 1920.
Stroud v. United States
STROUD v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE DISTRICT OP KANSAS. No. 276. Petition for rehearing. Decided January 19, 1920. Possible error in overruling a challenge for cause in this case was not prejudi
Chipman, Ltd. v. Thomas B. Jeffery Co.
CHIPMAN, LIMITED, v. THOMAS B. JEFFERY COMPANY. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES - FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT, OF NEW YORK. No. 516. Submitted December 8, 1919. — Decided January 19, 1920. By the law of New York, when a forei
Napa Valley Electric Co. v. Railroad Commission
NAPA VALLEY ELECTRIC COMPANY v. RAILROAD COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 401. Argued December 12, 1919. — Decided January 19, 1920
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.