Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1920 Cases
281 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Minnesota v. Wisconsin
STATE OF MINNESOTA v. STATE OF WISCONSIN. IN EQUITY. No. 16, Original. Argued October 16, 17, 1919. Decided March 8, 1920. Part of the boundary between Wisconsin and Minnesota is described in the Wisconsin Enabling Act of August 6, 1846, as
Pierce v. United States
PIERCE ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 234. Argued November 18, 19, 1919. Decided March 8, 1920. The decision in another case of a constitutional question
Eisner v. Macomber
EISNER, AS COLLECTOR OF UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE FOR THE THIRD DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, v. MACOMBER. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR .THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 318. Argued April 16, 1919; re
United States ex rel. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission
UNITED STATES AT THE RELATION OF KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 413. Argued December 10, 1919. Decided March 8, 1920. The Valuation Act
Gayon v. McCarthy
GAYON v. McCARTHY, UNITED STATES MARSHAL FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, ET AL. APPEAL FROM AND ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 540. Argued January 6, 1920. Decided March 1,
Ash Sheep Co. v. United States
ASH SHEEP COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM AND ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Nos. 212, 285. Argued January 30, 1920. Decided March 1, 1920. Whether or not by a cession of lands from an Indian tribe the Un
New York Central Railroad v. Mohney
NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY v. MOHNEY. certiorari to the court of APPEALS OF LUCAS COUNTY, STATE OF OHIO. No. 196. Argued January 27, 1920. Decided March 1, 1920. A railroad employee was injured through a collision while traveling on
Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. United States
KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 154. Submitted January 19, 1920. Decided March 1, 1920. A railroad company which enters into -a contract to carry the mails “upon the conditions pre
National Lead Co. v. United States
NATIONAL LEAD COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 123. Argued January 12, 13, 1920. Decided March 1, 1920. Section 22 of the Act of August 27,1894, c. 349, 28 Stilt. 509, provides: “That where imported materials o
Chapman v. Wintroath
CHAPMAN ET AL. v. WINTROATH. CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 117. Argued January 9, 1920. Decided March 1, 1920. An inventor whose application disclosed but did not claim an invention which is later paten
Grand Trunk Western Railway Co. v. United States
GRAND TRUNK WESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 153. Argued January 21, 22, 1920. Decided March 1, 1920. In settling with a railroad company under its current contract for mail transportation, the
Lee v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.
LEE v. CENTRAL OF GEORGIA RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OP APPEALS OP THE STATE OP GEORGIA. No. 150. Argued January 16, 1920. Decided March 1, 1920. A rule of state pleading and practice, applied without discrimination to c
McCloskey v. Tobin
McCLOSKEY v. TOBIN, SHERIFF OF BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS. ERROR TO THE COURT OP CRIMINAL APPEALS OP .THE STATE OP TEXAS. No. 79. Submitted November 12, 1919. Decided March 1, 1920. The rights under the Fourteenth Amendement of a layman engaged in
Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co. v. Wisconsin ex rel. City of Milwaukee
MILWAUKEE ELECTRIC RAILWAY & LIGHT COMPANY v. STATE OF WISCONSIN EX REL. CITY OF MILWAUKEE. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP WISCONSIN. No. 55. Argued November 10, 1919. Decided March 1, 1920. When it is claimed that the obligatio
United States v. A. Schrader's Son, Inc.
UNITED STATES v. A. SCHRADER’S SON, INC. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT. OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. No. 567. Argued January 22, 23, 1920. Decided March 1, 1920. A manufacturer of patented articles sold them to its
Chesbrough v. Northern Trust Co.
CHESBROUGH v. NORTHERN TRUST COMPANY, EXECUTOR OF SCHREIBER, ET AL. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 206. Argued January 30, 1920. Decided March 1, 1920. Judgment sustained as in accord with a stipulation to
Travis v. Yale & Towne Manufacturing Co.
TRAVIS, AS COMPTROLLER OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, v. YALE & TOWNE MANUFACTURING COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Nos. 548. Argued December 15, 16, 1919. Decided March 1, 1920
Shaffer v. Carter
SHAFFER v. CARTER, STATE AUDITOR, ET AL. APPEALS PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OP OKLAHOMA. Nos. 531, 580. Argued December 11, 12, 1919. Decided March 1, 1920. When, upon application for a preliminary
Ex parte Tiffany
EX PARTE IN THE MATTER OF J. RAYMOND TIFFANY, AS RECEIVER, ETC., PETITIONER. PETITION FOB WRIT OP MANDAMUS OB PBOHIBITION. No. 26, Original. Argued January 19, 1920. Decided March 1, 1920. Where the District Court, in a case depending on di
Pennsylvania Gas Co. v. Public Service Commission
PENNSYLVANIA GAS COMPANY v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, SECOND DISTRICT, OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, ET AL. ,ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW TORE. No. 330. Argued December 8, 9, 1919. Decided March 1, 1920. The transmission and
Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Ward
CHICAGO, ROCK ISLAND & PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL. v. WARD. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA. No. 198. Submitted January 28, 1920. Decided March 1, 1920. The Federal Employers’ Liability Act places a co-employee’s
Goldsmith v. George G. Prendergast Construction Co.
GOLDSMITH ET AL. v. GEORGE G. PRENDERGAST CONSTRUCTION COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP MISSOURI. No. 127. Argued January 13, 14, 1920. Decided March 1, 1920. In apportioning the cost of a sewer, the assessing authorities
Farncomb v. City & County of Denver
FARNCOMB ET AL. v. CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER ET AL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF COLORADO. No. 110. Argued January 14, 1920. Decided March 1, 1920. As construed by the Supreme Court .of Colorado,. §§ 300 and 328 of the charter
Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. City of Carrollton
JETT BROS. DISTILLING COMPANY v. CITY OF CARROLLTON. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KENTUCKY. No. 108. Argued December 19, 1919. Decided March 1, 1920. An objection that a tax is void under the Fourteenth Amendment because of
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.