Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1920 Cases
281 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Simpson v. United States
SIMPSON, SURVIVING EXECUTOR OF MOORE, v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 213. Argued March 17, 18, 1920. Decided April 19, 1920. In computing succession taxes payable under the War Revenue Act of 1898, upon legacies of t
Estate of P. D. Beckwith, Inc. v. Commissioner of Patents
ESTATE OF P. D. BECKWITH, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS. CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 178. Argued January 23, 1920. Decided April 19, 1920. The Trade-Mark • Registration Act declares (§ 5) that no ma
Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. Lederer
PENN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. LEDERER, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE. CERTIORARI to the circuit court of appeals for the THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 499. Argued March 22, 23, 1920. Decided April 19, 1920. The Income Tax Law of October 3,1913
Oneida Navigation Corp. v. W. & S. Job & Co.
ONEIDA NAVIGATION CORPORATION, CLAIMANT OF THE SAILING VESSEL “PERCY R. PYNE, 2d.” &c. v. W. & S. JOB & COMPANY, INC. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 259. Argued March 19, 1920.
Burnap v. United States
BURNAP v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 228. Argued March 12, 1920. Decided April 19, 1920. The power to remove from public office or employment is, in the absence of any statutory provision to the contrary, an inciden
First National Bank v. Williams
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF CANTON, PENNSYLVANIA, v. WILLIAMS, COMPTROLLER OF THE CURRENCY. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 618. Argued March 3, 1920. Decided April 19, 1920. A cau
Munday v. Wisconsin Trust Co.
MUNDAY, TRUSTEE, ET AL. v. WISCONSIN TRUST COMPANY ET AL. ERROR.. TO-THE SUPREME. COURT OP THE STATE OP WISCONSIN. No. 288. Argued March 25, 1920. Decided April 19, 1920. Whether a state statute is intended to validate a contract previously
Boehmer v. Pennsylvania Railroad
BOEHMER v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 191. Argued March 10, 11, 1920. Decided April 19, 1920. Section 4 of the Safety Appliance Act of 1893, in requiring grab irons
United States v. Chase National Bank
UNITED STATES v. CHASE NATIONAL BANK. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 134. Argued January 14, 15, 1920. Decided April 19, 1920. A drawee who pays a draft drawn to the drawer’s order, upon which the drawer’s
Hull v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.
HULL, ADMINISTRATRIX OF HULL, &c. v. PHILADELPHIA & READING RAILWAY COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND. No. 151. Argued January 16, 1920. Decided April 19, 1920. The terms “employee” and “employed” in the E
Houston v. Ormes
HOUSTON, SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY, ET AL. v. ORMES, ADMINISTRATOR OF LOCKWOOD. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP APPEALS OP THE DISTRICT OP COLUMBIA. No. 86. Argued January 23, 1920. Decided April 19, 1920. Where a fund has been appropriated by Con
United States v. Simpson
UNITED STATES v. SIMPSON. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO. No. 444. Submitted March 5, 1920. Decided April 19, 1920. The transportation by their owner of five quarts of whiskey for his personal
Cameron v. United States
CAMERON ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 205. Argued January 29, 30, 1920. Decided April 19, 1920. The inclusion of part of a national forest within a monument reserve' under the A
Askren v. Continental Oil Co.
ASKREN, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO, ET AL. v. CONTINENTAL OIL COMPANY. SAME v. SINCLAIR REFINING COMPANY. SAME v. THE TEXAS COMPANY. APPEALS PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES ’ POR THE DISTRICT OP NEW MEXICO. Nos
Blumenstock Bros. Advertising Agency v. Curtis Publishing Co.
BLUMENSTOCK BROTHERS ADVERTISING AGENCY v. CURTIS PUBLISHING COMPANY. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 197. Submitted January 26, 1920. Decided April 19, 1920. Jurisdiction based on
Missouri v. Holland
STATE OF MISSOURI v. HOLLAND, UNITED STATES GAME WARDEN. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF- MISSOURI. No. 609. Argued March 2, 1920. Decided April 19, 1920. Protection of its quasi sovereign rig
Kenney v. Supreme Lodge of the World, Loyal Order of Moose
KENNEY, ADMINISTRATOR OF KENNEY, v. SUPREME LODGE OF THE WORLD, LOYAL ORDER OF MOOSE. CERTIORARI AND ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP ILLINOIS. Nos. 269, 303. Argued March 23, 1920. Decided April 19, 1920. A statute denying jurisd
Cincinnati, Covington & Erlanger Railway Co. v. Kentucky
CINCINNATI, COVINGTON & ERLANGER RAILWAY COMPANY v. COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY. ERROR TO THE COURT OP APPEALS OP THE STATE . OP KENTUCKY. No. 253. Argued March 18, 19, 1920. Decided April 19, 1920. Decided on the authority of South Covington
South Covington & Cincinnati Street Railway Co. v. Kentucky
SOUTH COVINGTON & CINCINNATI STREET RAILWAY COMPANY v. COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KENTUCKY. No. 252. Argued March 18, 19, 1920. Decided April 19, 1920. A state law requiring interurban railroad c
Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. Northern Ohio Traction & Light Co.
CUYAHOGA RIVER POWER COMPANY v. NORTHERN OHIO TRACTION & LIGHT COMPANY ET AL. ’ APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OP OHIO. No. 102. Argued March 17, 1920. Decided April 19, 1920. Plaintiff; a hydr
Caldwell v. Parker
CALDWELL v. PARKER, SHERIFF OF CALHOUN COUNTY, ALABAMA. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE" UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA. No. 636. Argued March 4, 5, 1920. Decided April 19, 1920. The jurisdiction to try and punish for
Oklahoma v. Texas
STATE OF OKLAHOMA v. STATE OF TEXAS, UNITED STATES, INTERVENER. IN EQUITY. No. 27, Original. Motion for leave to intervene and to submit motion for injunction and receiver submitted March 29, 1920. Order entered April 1, 1920. Order grantin
France & Canada Steamship Corp. v. Storgard
No. 773. France & Canada Steamship Corporation v. Konrad Storgard. March 29, 1920. Mr. Bertrand L. Pettigrew for petitioner. Mr. Silas B. Axtell for respondent.
Central Elevator Co. v. Naam Looze Vennoot Schap
No. 760. Central Elevator Company of Baltimore City v. Naam Looze Vennoot Schap, etc. March 29, 1920. Mr. Frederic D. McKenney and Mr. Shirley Carter for petitioner. Mr. Charles R. Hickox and Mr. John M. Woolsey for respondent.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.