Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1921 Cases
257 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
United States ex rel. Widenmann v. Hughes
No. 92. United States ex rel. Robert A. Widenmann v. Charles E. Hughes, as Secretary of State, etc. Error to the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted December 12, 1921. Decided December 19, 192
American Column & Lumber Co. v. United States
AMERICAN COLUMN & LUMBER COMPANY ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL . FROM THE DISTRICT COURT Of' THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF «TENNESSEE. No. 71. Argued October 20, 21, 1920; restored to docket for reargument February 28, 192
Truax v. Corrigan
TRUAX ET AL., COPARTNERS, DOING BUSINESS UNDER THE FIRM NAME AND STYLE OF WILLIAM TRUAX, v. CORRIGAN ET AL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA. No. 13. Argued April 29, 30, 1920; restored to docket for reargument June 6, 192
Tilton v. Drennen
No. 334. McLane Tilton v. Felix M. Drennen, as Receiver, etc. December 12, 1921. Mr. Forney Johnston, for appellant. Mr. H. L. Stevens for appellee. [See post, 651, 657.]
Hill v. Wallace
HILL, JR., ET AL. v. WALLACE, SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE, ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 616. Argued on motion to modify restraining order December 5, 1921. Order entered
Oklahoma v. Texas
STATE OF OKLAHOMA v. STATE OF TEXAS. UNITED STATES, INTERVENER. IN EQUITY. No. 20, Original. ORDERS ENTERED DECEMBER 12, 1921. Granting leave to intervene. The motion of the Grand Oil & Developing Company, submitted December 9, 1921, is gra
Miller v. American Bonding Co.
MILLER v. AMERICAN BONDING COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 59. Argued November 8, 1921. Decided December 12, 1921. 1. The proceeding which the Act of August 13, 1894, c. 280, 28'Stat. 278, as amende
Dahnke-Walker Milling Co. v. Bondurant
DAHNKE-WALKER MILLING COMPANY v. BONDURANT. ERROR TO THE COURT OP APPEALS OP THE STATE OP KENTUCKY. No. 30. Argued March 18, 1921; restored to docket for reargument June 6, 1921; reargued October 10, 1921. Decided December 12, 1921. 1. A de
United Fuel Gas Co. v. Hallanan
UNITED FUEL GAS COMPANY v. HALLANAN, STATE TAX COMMISSIONER OF THE STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, ET AL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP APPEALS OP THE STATE OP WEST VIRGINIA. No. 276. Argued November 9, 10, 1921. Decided December 12, 1921. 1. A wri
Eureka Pipe Line Co. v. Hallanan
EUREKA PIPE LINE COMPANY v. HALLANAN, STATE TAX COMMISSIONER, ET AL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP APPEALS OP THE STATE OP WEST VIRGINIA. No. 255. Argued November 9, 1921. Decided December 12, 1921. 1. A judgment of a state court which sust
Curtis v. Connly
CURTIS, RECEIVER OF ATLANTIC NATIONAL BANK OF PROVIDENCE, R. I. v. CONNLY ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT. No. 69. Argued November 16, 17, 1921. Decided December 12, 1921. 1. The state statute of limita
Central Railroad v. United States & Interstate Commerce Commission
CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY ET AL. v. UNITED STATES AND INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE DISTRICT OP NEW JERSEY. No. 436. Argued November 17, 1921. Decided December 5, 19
Kahn v. United States
KAHN ET AL., EXECUTORS OF WOLFF, v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 52. Argued November 15, 1921. Decided December 5, 1921. Legacies of life interests in trust funds held vested in possession or enjoyment prior to''July
Western Fuel Co. v. Garcia
WESTERN FUEL COMPANY v. GARCIA, ADMINISTRATOR OF SOUZA. CERTIFICATE FROM AND CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 28. Argued March 18, 1921; restored to docket for reargument and writ of certiorari ordered t
Rafferty v. Smith, Bell & Co.
RAFFERTY, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE FOR THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS, v. SMITH, BELL & COMPANY, LIMITED. SAME v. COMPANIA GENERAL DE TABACOS DE FILIPINAS. SAME v. VISAYAN REFINING COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE PHILIPPINE ISL
Hurley v. Commission of Fisheries
HURLEY v. COMMISSION OF FISHERIES OF VIRGINIA ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. No. 33. Argued October 10, 11, 1921. Decided December 5, 1921. Decree of the District Court refus
North Pacific Steamship Co. v. Soley
NORTH PACIFIC STEAMSHIP COMPANY v. SOLEY. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 63. Submitted November 7, 1921. Decided December 5, 1921. 1. It is the duty of the District Court to
Robert Mitchell Furniture Co. v. Selden Breck Construction Co.
ROBERT MITCHELL FURNITURE COMPANY v. SELDEN BRECK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR ' THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OP OHIO. No. 56. Argued November 7, 1921. Decided December 5, 1921. 1. A judgment of the Di
American Steel Foundries v. Tri-City Central Trades Council
AMERICAN STEEL FOUNDRIES v. TRI-CITY CENTRAL TRADES COUNCIL ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT * COURT OP APPEALS POR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 2. Argued January 17, 1919; restored to docket for reargument June 1, 1920; reargued October 5, 192
Jones v. Seiffert
No. 72. Eastman Jones, a Minor, etc. v. H. O. Seiffert et al. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Oklahoma. Submitted November 17, 1921. Decided November 21, 1921. Mr. W. F. Semple and Mr. W. E. Utterback for plaintiff in error. Mr.
City of Chicago v. Chicago Railways Co.
No. 61. City of Chicago v. Chicago Railways Company et al. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Illinois. Argued November 8, 9, 1921. Decided November 21, 1921. Mr. Chester E. Cleveland, with whom Mr. Samuel A. Ettelson and Mr. George
Oklahoma v. Texas
No. 20, Original. State of Oklahoma v. State of Texas. November 21, 1921.
Texas-Cherokees & Associate Bands v. Texas
No. —, Original. The Texas-Cherokees and Associate Bands v. State of Texas. Motion for leave to file bill of complaint submitted November 14, 1921. Decided November 21, 1921. Mr. William Sulzer for complainant.
Rockefeller v. United States
ROCKEFELLER v. UNITED STATES. NEW YORK TRUST COMPANY ET AL., EXECUTORS OF HARKNESS, v. EDWARDS, COLLECTOR OF UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE FOR THE SECOND DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED' STATES FOR THE SOUTH
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.