Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1921 Cases
257 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Ex parte Oregon Eilers Music House
No. —, Original. Ex parte: In the Matter of Oregon Eilers Music House, Petitioner. Submitted October 4, 1921. Decided October 24, 1921. Mr. Will R. King, Mr. Thomas Mannix and Mr. C. A. A. McGee for petitioner. Mr. Levi Cooke and Mr. Willia
Ex parte Lincoln Gas & Electric Light Co.
EX PARTE IN THE MATTER OF LINCOLN GAS & ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY, PETITIONER. ON PETITION FOR REHEARING OF APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS. No. 29, Original. October Term, 1920. Decided October 24, 1921. Where a decree of the District Court,
Smietanka v. Indiana Steel Co.
SMIETANKA, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, v. INDIANA STEEL COMPANY. ON CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 214. Argued October 14, 1921. Decided October 24, 1921. 1.
Davis v. Green
No. 439. James C. Davis, Director General of Railroads, etc. v. Mrs. Maude E. Green, Administratrix, etc. October 17, 1921. Mr. B. E. Eaton and Mr. T. J. Wills for petitioner. Mr. J. W. Cassedy for respondent.
Ward v. Washington
No. 17. Edward C. Ward v. State of Washington et al. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Washington. Argued October 6, 1921. Decided October 17, 1921. Mr. W. F. Magill, with whom Mr. H. S. Wilson, Mr. Donald MacMaster and Mr. Geo. A.
Oklahoma v. Texas
No. 20, Original. State of Oklahoma v. State of Texas. Orders entered October 17, 1921.
Colonial Beach Co. v. Quemahoning Coal Co.
No. 388. Colonial Beach Company, Owner, etc. v. Quemahoning Coal Company et al. October 10, 1921. Mr. Hugh H. Obear and Mr. Paul Dulaney for petitioner. No appearance for respondents.
Davis v. Smith
No. 327. James C. Davis, Director General, etc. v. J. J. Smith, Jr., Administrator, etc. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Mississippi. October 10, 1921. Mr. H. O’B. Cooper, Mr. J. Blanc Monroe, Mr. Monte M. Lemann, Mr. A. S. Bozem
Goodrich v. West Lumber Co.
No. 158. Cornelia G. Goodrich et al. v. West Lumber Company. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Texas. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted October 4, 1921. Decided October 10, 1921. Mr. Hannis Taylor for plaintiffs in error. Mr. H
Oklahoma v. Texas
No. 20, Original. State of Oklahoma v. State of Texas. Order entered October 5, 1921.
Browne v. Thorn
No. 933. Fred Browne v. Charles B. Thorn et al., Partners, etc. Error to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. June 6, 1921.
United States v. Sischo
No. 898. United States v. Wesley L. Sischo. June 6, 1921.
Weber Electric Co. v. E. H. Freeman Electric Co.
WEBER ELECTRIC COMPANY v. E. H. FREEMAN ELECTRIC COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR' THE THIRD CIRCUIT. ’ No. 273. Argued April 21, 1921. Decided June 6, 1921. 1. A patented device for fastening together the metal cap a
Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Poston
WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH COMPANY v. POSTON. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA. No. 293. Argued October 20, 1920. Decided June 6, 1921. 1. A telegraph company is not subject to a cómmon-law liability for negligent
Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. Road Improvement District Number 6 of Little River
KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL. v. ROAD IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NUMBER 6 OF LITTLE RIVER COUNTY, ARKANSAS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP ARKANSAS. No. 205. Argued March 16, 17, 1921. Decided June 6, 1921. 1. A judgment
Seaboard Air Line Railway v. United States
SEABOARD AIR LINE RAILWAY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 62. Argued March 16, 1920; restored to docket for reargument'November 16, 1920; reargued April 12, 1921. Decided June 6, 1921 Section 3477 of the Revised Statu
Harris v. District of Columbia
HARRIS, BY HIS NEXT FRIEND, ETC. v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. ON CERTIFICATE FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. • No. 16. Argued January 24, 1919. Decided June 6, 1921. 1, ': The work of cleaning the streets for the protecti
Bowman v. Continental Oil Co.
BOWMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO, ET. AL. v. CONTINENTAL OIL COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO. No. 695. Argued April 14, 1921. Decided June 6, 1921. A statute of
Merchants' National Bank v. City of Richmond
MERCHANTS’ NATIONAL BANK OF RICHMOND, VIRGINIA, v. CITY OF RICHMOND. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP APPEALS OP THE STATE OP VIRGINIA. No. 240. Argued March 21, 1921. Decided June 6, 1921. 1. A judgment of a state supreme court sustaining a s
United States v. Woodward
UNITED STATES v. WOODWARD ET AL., EXECUTORS OF WOODWARD. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF . CLAIMS. No. 811. Argued April 18, 1921. Decided June 6, 1921. The Revenue Act of 1918, Title II, taxes by fixed percentages the net income “received by.esta
Texas Co. v. Hogarth Shipping Co.
THE TEXAS COMPANY v. HOGARTH SHIPPING COMPANY, LTD., OWNER OF THE STEAMSHIP BARON OGILVY, ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 555. Argued January 26, 27, 1921. Decided June 6, 1921. 1. A voyage char
Ex parte Hussein Lutfi Bey
EX PARTE IN THE MATTER OF HUSSEIN LUTFI BEY, MASTER OF THE GUL DJEMAL, PETITIONER. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF PROHIBITION AND A WRIT OF MANDAMUS. . No. —, Original. Motion submitted February 28, 1921. Decided June 6, 19
Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. United States
MISSOURI, KANSAS & TEXAS RAILWAY COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 52. Submitted April 26, 1921. Decided June 6, 1921. 1. After a railroad company had entered into a contract to carry the. mails with notice tha
Dwelling Building & Loan Ass'n v. MacHenry
No. 318. Dwelling Building & Loan Association et al. v. Winfield S. MacHenry, Trustee in Bankruptcy. Appeal from the Circuit Court, of Appeals for the Third. Circuit. Submitted April 29, 1921. Decided June 1, 1921.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.