Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1921 Cases
257 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
United States v. Phellis
UNITED STATES v. PHELLIS. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 260. Argued October 11, 1921. Decided November 21, 1921. 1. Substance and not form should control in the application of the Sixteenth Amendment and the income tax laws enacted u
Kern River Co. v. United States
KERN RIVER COMPANY ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ' NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 50. Argued October 20, 21, 1921. Decided November 21, 1921. 1. A right of way through public lands or reservations, obtained t
John Horstmann Co. v. United States
JOHN HORSTMANN COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. NATRON SODA COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEALS FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. Nos. 26, 32. Argued October 7, 1921. Decided November 21, 1921. In actions in the Court of Claims for damages resulting from an
Crescent Cotton Oil Co. v. Mississippi
CRESCENT COTTON OIL COMPANY v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP MISSISSIPPI. No. 41. Argued October 17, 1921. Decided November 14, 1921. Plaintiff in error, a Tennessee corporation, engaged in the manufacture
Hill v. Smith
No. 510. Donald M. Hill et al. v. Charles S. Smith. November 7, 1921. Mr. Edward E. Blodgett for petitioners. No brief filed for respondent.
Great Northern Railway Co. v. Steinke
No. 481. Great Northern Railway Company v. Vivian H. Steinke et al. November 7, 1921.
Boylan v. United States
No. 111. Julia Boylan et al. v. United States. Error to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Motion to dismiss submitted October 24, 1921. Decided November 7, 1921. Mr. William F. Santry and Mr. E. Leland Hunt for plaintiffs
Hunt v. United States
HUNT, EXECUTOR OF WEIGHEL, v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL'FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 38. Argued October 17, 1921. Decided November 7, 1921. 1. United States v. Utah, Nevada
Breiholz v. Board of Supervisors
BREIHOLZ ET AL. v. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF POCAHONTAS COUNTY, IOWA, ET AL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IOWA. No. 23. Argued October 7, 1921. Decided November 7, 1921. 1. A state law under which a drainage district has been es
Louisiana & Pine Bluff Railway Co. v. United States
LOUISIANA & PINE BLUFF RAILWAY COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS. No. 291. Argued October 14, 1921. Decided November 7, 1921. 1. In a suit to set aside an orde
Alabama & Vicksburg Railway Co. v. Journey
ALABAMA & VICKSBURG RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL. v. JOURNEY. ERROR AND CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP MISSISSIPPI. No. 55. Argued October 21, 1921. Decided November 7, 1921. '1. The order of the Director General of' Railroads, pr
Citizens National Bank v. Durr
CITIZENS NATIONAL BANK OF CINCINNATI, ADMINISTRATOR OF ANDERSON, v. DURR, AS FORMER AUDITOR, ET AL. ERROR AND CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OHIO. No. 27. Argued October 7, 1921. Decided November 7, 1921. 1. Where objection
Wilson v. Republic Iron & Steel Co.
WILSON v. REPUBLIC IRON & STEEL COMPANY ET AL. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA. No. 21. Argued October 6, 7, 1921. Decided November 7, 1921. 1. Whether a District Court into which a case
Pennsylvania Railroad v. Weber
PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY v. WEBER, SURVIVING PARTNER OF JACOBY AND WEBER, COPARTNERS, TRADING UNDER THE FIRM NAME OF W. F. JACOBY & COMPANY. ERROR .TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 210. Argued October 13, 1921
Eberlein v. United States
EBERLEIN v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 12. Argued October 5, 1921. Decided November 7, 1921. E, having been removed by the Secretary of the Treasury from a place in the customs service after due hearing upon charges
Norris v. United States
NORRIS v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 11. Argued October 5, 1921. Decided November 7, 1921. N, having been wrongfully removed from the office of customs inspector, without being furnished a copy of the charges agains
Nicholas v. United States
NICHOLAS v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 10. Argued October 5, 1921. Decided November 7, 1921. 1. A person who has been removed from a place in the classified civil service, by the proper authority, but without charge
Springfield Gas & Electric Co. v. City of Springfield
SPRINGFIELD GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY v. CITY OF SPRINGFIELD. EEEOE TO THE SUPBEME COUET OP THE-STATE OP ILLINOIS. No. 46. Argued October 19, 1921. Decided November 7, 1921. State legislation permitting a city owning an electric plant to sell
Marine Railway & Coal Co. v. United States
MARINE RAILWAY & COAL COMPANY, INC. v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OP COLUMBIA. No. 45. Argued October 18, 1921. Decided November 7, 1921. 1. The jurisdiction of this court to review judgments of the Court o
United States v. Janowitz
UNITED STATES v. JANOWITZ ET AL. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 49. Argued October 20, 1921. Decided November 7, 1921. A conspiracy to purchase war savings certificates from their
United States v. Sacks
UNITED STATES v. SACKS. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 48. Argued October 20, 1921. Decided November 7, 1921. 1. Under the Act of September 24, 1917, amended September 24, 1918, c
Hildreth v. Mastoras
HILDRETH v. MASTORAS. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRQUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR-THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 51. Argued October 21, 1921. Decided November 7, 1921. 1. The presumption of priority and novelty which arises from the granting of a patent has gre
Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad v. City of Clarksdale
YAZOO & MISSISSIPPI VALLEY RAILROAD COMPANY ET AL. v. CITY OF CLARKSDALE. ERROR AND CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI. No. 15. Argued October 6, 1921. Decided November 7, 1921. 1. A judgment of a state court denyin
Smietanka v. First Trust & Savings Bank
No. 540. Julius F. Smietanka, Collector of Internal Revenue, etc. v. First Trust & Savings Bank, Trustee, etc. October 24, 1921. Mr. Solicitor General Beck for petitioner. Mr. John P. Wilson for respondent. [See ante, 602.]
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.