Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1922 Cases
268 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Kokenor v. United States
No. 508. Ernest W. Kokenor v. United States. October 23, 1922. Mr. Solicitor General Beck, Mr. Assistant Attorney General Grim, and Mr. H. S. Ridgely for the United States.
Jones v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.
No. 503. Mrs. Essie Lee Jones, Administratrix, etc., v. Central of Georgia Railway Company. October 23, 1922. Mr. Emmett Houser and Mr. Thomas Swift Felder for petitioner. Mr. T. M. Cunningham, Jr., and Mr. Richard C. Jordon for respondent.
Federal Trade Commission v. Raymond Bros.-Clark Co.
No. 535. Federal Trade Commission v. Raymond Bros.-Clark Company. October 23, 1922. Mr. Solicitor General Beck, Mr. W. H. Fuller and Mr. Adrien F. Busick for petitioner. Mr. Emmet Tinley for respondent.
Porto Rico Railway, Light & Power Co. v. Camunas
No. 70. Porto Rico Railway, Light & Power Company v. Manuel Camunas et al., etc., et al. Appeal from the Circuit Court off Appeals for the First Circuit. Argued October 17, 18, 1922. Decided October 23, 1922. Mr. Carroll G. Walter for appel
Southern Lighterage & Wrecking Co. v. United States
No. 60. Southern Lighterage & Wrecking Company v. United States. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Louisiana. Argued October 13, 1922. Decided October 23, 1922. Mr. E. Howard McCaleb, for appell
Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Louisiana Public Service Commission
No. —, Original. No. 650. Ex parte: In the Matter of Huey P. Long et al., etc., Petitioners, and Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Company v. Louisiana Public Service Commission et al. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for
Interstate Commerce Commission v. United States ex rel. Members of Waste Merchants Ass'n of New York
INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION v. UNITED STATES EX REL. MEMBERS OF THE WASTE MERCHANTS ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 245. Argued October 9, 10, 1922. Decided October 23, 1922. Mandam
Jackman v. Rosenbaum Co.
JACKMAN v. ROSENBAUM COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP PENNSYLVANIA. No. 3. Argued October 4, 1922. Decided October 23, 1922. 1. The fact that a practice is of ancient standing in a State is a reason for holding it unaffec
United States v. Wong Sing
UNITED STATES v. WONG SING. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OP UTAH. No. 44. Argued October 11, 1922. Decided October 23, 1922. 1. Under the Revenue Act of February 24, 1919, c. 18, § 1006, 40 Stat. 1130, i
Gaffney v. Hoyt
No. 65. Robert J. Gaffney et al. v. James M. Hoyt et al. 'Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the’Northern District,of Illinois. October 16, 1922. Mr. James W. Cutshaw for appellants. 'Mr. Lewis, A. Stebbins, Mr. Eugene
Beer, Sondheimer & Co. v. American & Cuban Steamship Line, Inc.
No. 493. Beer, Sondheimer & Company, Inc., v. American & Cuban Steamship Line, Inc. October 16, 1922. Mr. D. Roger Englar for petitioner. Mr. Frank V. Barnes for respondent.
Union Electric Welding Co. v. Curry
No. 481. Union Electric Welding Company v. John P. Curry et al. October 16, 1922. Mr.. Thomas H. Tracy, Mr. George D. Welles and Mr. Charles E. Brock for petitioner. Mr. Samuel Owen Edmonds and Mr. Wilbur Owén for respondents.
Mobile Shipbuilding Co. v. Federal Bridge & Structural Co.
No. 465. Mobile Shipbuilding Company v. Federal Bridge & Structural Company. October 16, 1922. Mr, .Solicitor General Beck, Mr. Elmer Schlesinger, Mr. Chauncey G. Parker and Mr. Henry M. Ward for petitioner. Mr. Amos C. Miller and Mr. Willi
Reed v. Village of Hibbing
No. 319. Henry P. Reed et al. v. Village of Hibbing et al. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Minnesota. October 16, 1922. Mr. H. V. Mercer,, for plaintiffs in error, in support of the petition. Mr. C. A. Severance, Mr. George W. Mo
Ford v. United States
No. 495. Benjamin N. Ford v. United States. October 16, 1922. Mr. Nelson B. Cramer for petitioner. No brief filed for the United States.
Canute Steamship Co. v. Pittsburgh & West Virginia Coal Co.
No. 471. Canute Steamship Company, Limited, et al. v. Pittsburgh & West Virginia Coal Company et al. October 16, 1922. Mr. Charles R. Hickóx and Mr. Delbert M. Tibbetts for petitioners. Mr. John W. Davis, Mr. Theodore Kiendl, Mr. Tracy L Te
United States v. Anderson
No. 458. United States v. Henry B. Anderson. October 16, 1922. Mr. Solicitor General Beck for the United States. Mr. Roy C. Gasser for respondent.
Mills v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.
No. 48. No. 49. No. 50. Ira B. Mills et al. v. Northern Pacific Railway Company et al.; Railroad & Warehouse Commission of Minnesota et al. v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Company; and Railroad & Warehouse Commission of Mi
North Carolina Railroad v. Lee
NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPANY v. LEE, ADMINISTRATRIX OF LEE CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP NORTH CAROLINA. No. 33. Argued October 6, 1922. Decided October 16, 1922. 1. A railroad corporation whose line, while leased to an
Knights v. Jackson
KNIGHTS v. JACKSON, TREASURER AND RECEIVER GENERAL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OP THE STATE OP MASSACHUSETTS. No. 167. Argued October 3, 1922. Decided October 16, 1922. The objection that a tax on a special class of persons and pro
Charlotte Harbor & Northern Railway Co. v. Welles
CHARLOTTE HARBOR & NORTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. WELLES ET AL., CONSTITUTING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DE SOTO COUNTY, FLORIDA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP FLORIDA. No. 4. Submitted March 16, 1921; restored to docket
Lederer v. Stockton
LEDERER, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA, v. STOCKTON, SOLE SURVIVING TRUSTEE OF DERBYSHIRE, DECEASED. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS-FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 16. Argued October 5, 1922. —
Ponder v. Georgia
No. 42. George F. Ponder v. State of Georgia. Error to the Court.of Appeals of the .State of Georgia. October 9, 1922. Mr. Max Isaac for plaintiff in error. Mr. George M. Napier for defendant in error.
Converse v. Portsmouth Cotton Oil Refining Corp.
No. 441. H. P. Converse et al. v. Portsmouth Cotton Oil Refining Corporation. October 9, 1922. Mr. Edward R. Baird, Jr., Mr. George M. Banning, Mr. Clarence W. De Knight and Mr. Rufus S. Day for petitioners. Mr. Thomas H. Willcox and Mr. J.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.