Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1923 Cases
351 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Jose Taya's Sons Co. v. Duche
No. 1101. Jose Taya’s Sons Company, Claimant of the Steamship Asuarca, etc. v. Jean B. M. Duche et al. June 11, 1923. Mr. John M. Woolsey and Mr. Robert S. Erskine for petitioner. Mr. D. Roger Englar and Mr. T. Catesby Jones for respondents
Federal Trade Commission v. Mennen Co.
No. 1079. Federal Trade Commission v. Mennen Company. June 11, 1923. Mr. Solicitor General Beck, Mr. Alfred A. Wheat, Mr. W. H. Fuller and Mr. Adrien F. Busick for petitioner. Mr. Gilbert H. Montague for respondent.
Hillegass v. Rohm
No. 967. A. J. Hillegass et al. v. Bertha Rohm, Administratrix, etc. June 11, 1923. Mr. A. J. Hillegass and Mr. Jo V. Morgan for petitioners. No appearance for respondent.
Delaney v. United States
No. 1113. Thomas A. Delaney v. United States. June 11, 1923. Mr. Michael M. Doyle and Mr. Lawrence M. Fine for petitioner. No brief filed for the United States.
Eighth Avenue Railroad v. Hedges
No. 656. No. 657. Eighth Avenue Railroad Company v. Job E. Hedges, as Receiver of the New York Railways Company; and Ninth Avenue Railroad Company v. Job E. Hedges, as Receiver of the New York Railways Company. Appeals from the Circuit Cour
Cochran v. Becker
No. 498. James K. Cochran and Harris Kobey v. Coulton M. Becker. Error to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Motion submitted June 4, 1923. Decided June 11, 1923. Mr. Harris Kohey pro se. Mr. Oliver J. Miller for defendant
Oklahoma v. Texas
STATE OF OKLAHOMA v. STATE OF TEXAS. UNITED STATES, INTERVENER. No. 18, Original. Order entered June 11, 1923. Order providing for release of certain lands from the receivership herein, upon stated conditions.
Milheim v. Moffat Tunnel Improvement District
MILHEIM ET AL. v. MOFFAT TUNNEL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ET AL. ERROR to the supreme court of the state of colorado. No. 791. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted February 20, 1923. Decided June 11, 1923. 1. A federal question which requires a
Rindge Co. v. County of Los Angeles
RINDGE COMPANY ET AL. v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. No. 237. Argued April 26, 1923. Decided June 11, 1923. 1. Whether a use for which pr
City National Bank of El Paso v. El Paso & Northeastern Railroad
CITY NATIONAL BANK OF EL PASO, TEXAS, v. EL PASO & NORTHEASTERN RAILROAD COMPANY ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OP CIVIL APPEALS, EIGHTH SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT, OP THE STATE OF TEXAS. No. 309. Argued March 12, 1923. Decided June 11, 1923
Bluefield Water Works & Improvement Co. v. Public Service Commission
BLUEFIELD WATER WORKS & IMPROVEMENT COMPANY v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA ET AL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP APPEALS OP THE STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA. No. 256. Argued January 22, 1923. Decided June 11, 1923. 1. A
Joslin Manufacturing Co. v. City of Providence
JOSLIN MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. CITY OF PROVIDENCE ET AL. SCITUATE LIGHT & POWER COMPANY v. CITY OF PROVIDENCE ET AL. JOSLIN v. CITY OF PROVIDENCE ET AL. ERROR TO THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF RHODE ISLAND. Nos. 219, 220, 221. Argued A
Farmers & Merchants Bank of Monroe v. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond
FARMERS AND MERCHANTS BANK OF MONROE, NORTH CAROLINA, ET AL. v. FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF RICHMOND, VIRGINIA. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. 823. Argued April 30, May 1, 1923. Decided June 11, 1923. 1. Man
American Bank & Trust Co. v. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta
AMERICAN BANK & TRUST COMPANY ET AL. v. FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF ATLANTA ET AL. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 717. Argued April 30, May 1, 1923. Decided June 11, 1923. 1. It is within the statutory power
Lion Bonding & Surety Co. v. Karatz
LION BONDING & SURETY COMPANY v. KARATZ. DEPARTMENT OF TRADE & COMMERCE OF THE STATE OF NEBRASKA ET AL. v. HERTZ ET AL., AS RECEIVERS OF LION BONDING & SURETY COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. Nos.
Georgia Railway & Power Co. v. Railroad Commission
GEORGIA RAILWAY & POWER COMPANY ET AL. v. RAILROAD COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF GEORGIA ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA. No. 298. Argued November 29, 1922. Decided June 11, 1923.
Commonwealth v. West Virginia
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA. STATE OF OHIO v. STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA. IN EQUITY. Nos. 15 and 16, Original. Decree entered June 11, 1923. Decree, declaring c. 71, Laws of West Virginia of 1919, unconstitutional; en
Pennsylvania v. West Virginia
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA. STATE OF OHIO v. STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA. IN EQUITY. Nos. 15 and 16, Original. Argued December 8, 9, 1921; restored to docket for reargument January 9, 1922; reargued February 28, March
Kentucky Finance Corp. v. Paramount Auto Exchange Corp.
KENTUCKY FINANCE CORPORATION v. PARAMOUNT AUTO EXCHANGE CORPORATION. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WISCONSIN. No. 17. Argued October 5, 1922. Decided June 11, 1923. 1. A corporation which goes into a State other than that of it
Chas. Wolff Packing Co. v. Court of Industrial Relations
CHAS. WOLFF PACKING COMPANY v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP KANSAS. No. 739. Argued April 27, 1923. Decided June 11, 1923. 1. Legislative authority to abridge freedom of co
Sonneborn Bros. v. Cureton
SONNEBORN BROTHERS v. CURETON, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, ET AL. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OP TEXAS. No. 20. Argued March 24, 1922; restored to docket fox reargument May 29, 19
New York Central Railroad v. Cuddeback
No. 1076. New York Central Railroad Company v. Florence M. Cuddeback, as Administratrix, etc. June 4, 1923. Mr. Daniel M. Beach for petitioner. Mr. Arthur E. Sutherland for respondent.
Morse Dry Dock & Repair Co. v. Danielson
No. 1062. No. 1063. No. 1064. Morse Dry Dock & Repair Company v. John Danielson, an Infant, etc.; Morse Dry Dock & Repair Company v. Eilen S. Warren, Administratrix, etc.; and Morse Dry Dock & Repair Company v. William J. Connelly. June 4,
United States v. Ganci
No. 1040. United States v. Giuseppe Ganci. June 4, 1923. Mr. Solicitor General Beck, Mr. Assistant Attorney Géneral Grim and Mr. Harry S. Ridgely for the United States. Mr. M. Michael Edelstein for respondent.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.