Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1924 Cases
322 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
United States v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.
UNITED STATES v. TITLE INSURANCE & TRUST COMPANY ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 358. Argued February 28, 1924. Decided June 9, 1924. 1. Where there are two grounds upon either of which an appellat
United Leather Workers International Union, Local Lodge or Union No. 66 v. Herkert & Meisel Trunk Co.
UNITED LEATHER WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, LOCAL LODGE OR UNION NO. 66, ET AL. v. HERKERT & MEISEL TRUNK COMPANY ET AL. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 233. Argued April 24, 25, 1924. Decided June 9, 19
United States & Cuban Allied Works Engineering Corp. v. Lloyds
UNITED STATES & CUBAN ALLIED WORKS ENGINEERING CORPORATION v. LLOYDS, A CORPORATION, AS TREASURER OF LLOYDS UNDERWRITERS SYNDICATE NO. 601, ET AL. ON TRANSFER FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 940. Motion to dism
Wiggins v. Hummel
No. 996. Samuel T. Wiggins, Assignee, etc., et al. v. F. E. Hummel, Receiver. June 2, 1924. Mr. R. N. McConnell for petitioners. No appearance for respondent.
Sain v. Cypress Creek Drainage District
No. 890. Peter Sain et al. v. Cypress Creek Drainage District. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Arkansas. June 2, 1924. Mr. Lamar Williamson, for plaintiffs in error, in support of the petition. Mr. Charles T. Coleman appeared for
Fulton National Bank v. Hoosier
No. 750. Fulton National Bank of Atlanta v. I. S. Hoosier et al., Receivers, etc. June 2, 1924. Mr. John D. Little, Mr. Arthur G. Powell, Mr. Marion Smith and Mr. Max F. Goldstein for petitioner. No appearance for respondents.
City of New York v. Garrison
No. 892. City of New York et al. v. Lindley M. Garrison, as Receiver, etc., et al. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Motion to dismiss submitted May 26, 1924. Decided June 2, 1924. Mr
Thomson Spot Welder Co. v. Ford Motor Co.
THOMSON SPOT WELDER COMPANY v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 120. Argued December 5, 1923. Decided June 2, 1924. 1. The question whether an improvement in the arts involved inventi
United States v. Ninety-five Barrels, More or Less, Alleged Apple Cider Vinegar, Douglas Packing Co.
UNITED STATES v. NINETY-FIVE BARRELS, MORE OR LESS, ALLEGED APPLE CIDER VINEGAR, DOUGLAS PACKING COMPANY, CLAIMANT. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 559. Argued April 10, 11, 1924. Decided June 2, 1924.
United States & Interstate Commerce Commission v. American Railway Express Co.
UNITED STATES AND INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION v. AMERICAN RAILWAY EXPRESS COMPANY ET AL. SOUTHEASTERN EXPRESS COMPANY v. AMERICAN RAILWAY EXPRESS COMPANY ET AL. SOUTHERN TRAFFIC LEAGUE ET AL. v. AMERICAN RAILWAY EXPRESS COMPANY ET AL. AP
Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. City of San Francisco
PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO. PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ET AL. PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ET AL. APPEALS FROM THE DISTRIC
Goto v. Lane
GOTO ET AL. v. LANE, HIGH SHERIFF OF THE TERRITORY OF HAWAII. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII. No. 463. Argued February 28, 29, 1924. Decided June 2, 1924. 1. In the federal courts a discharge
Gnerich v. Rutter
GNERICH ET AL., COPARTNERS, DOING BUSINESS UNDER THE FIRM NAME OF B. & S. DRUG COMPANY v. RUTTER, AS PROHIBITION DIRECTOR IN AND FOR THE DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 79. Argued
Hetrick v. Village of Lindsey
HETRICK v. VILLAGE OF LINDSEY, ET AL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OHIO. No. 231. Argued April 23, 1924. Decided June 2, 1924. Failure of the state law to provide for notice and hearing before the making of a special assessmen
Dennison Brick & Tile Co. v. Chicago Trust Co.
No. 976. Dennison Brick & Tile Company v. Chicago Trust Company et al. May 26, 1924. Mr. Smith W. Bennett for petitioner. Mr. George W. Reed and Mr. Brooklyn Bridge for respondents.
Ex parte City of New York
No. —, Original. Ex parte: In the Matter of the City of New York et al., Petitioners. Submitted May 12, 1924. Decided May 26, 1924. Mr. George P. Nicholson and Mr. William G. Fullen for petitioners.
New York State Railways v. Shuler
NEW YORK STATE RAILWAYS v. SHULER, AS TREASURER OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, ET AL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. No. 103. Argued January 9, 1924. Decided May 26, 1924. Decided on the authority of Sheehan Co. v. Shuler,
R. E. Sheehan Co. v. Shuler
R. E. SHEEHAN COMPANY ET AL. v. SHULER, AS STATE TREASURER OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, ET AL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP NEW YORK. No. 593. Argued January 9, 1924. Decided May 26, 1924. Amendments of the New York Workmen’s Com
Liberty National Bank v. Bear
LIBERTY NATIONAL BANK OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA, v. BEAR, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY OF THE ESTATES OF W. L. BECKER, SR., AND W. L. BECKER, JR., PARTNERS, ETC. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 238. Argued April 2
St. Cloud Public Service Co. v. City of St. Cloud
ST. CLOUD PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY v. CITY OF ST. CLOUD. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. No. 10. Argued October 2, 1923. Decided May 26, 1924. 1. A State may authorize a municipal corporation
Lucking v. Detroit & Cleveland Navigation Co.
LUCKING v. DETROIT & CLEVELAND NAVIGATION COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 212. Argued March 11, 12, 1924. Decided May 26, 1924. 1. A suit by a past and prospective passenger and shipper to compel
Kennedy v. United States
KENNEDY ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 222. Argued April 16, 1924. Decided May 26, 1924. That portion of the Act of July 23, 1892, as amended, which made possession of into
Asakura v. City of Seattle
ASAKURA v. CITY OF SEATTLE ET AL. EKBOR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON No. 211. Argued February 25, 1924. Decided May 26, 1924. 1. The treaty-making power extends to all proper subjects of negotiation between our Government
Swendig v. Washington Water Power Co.
SWENDIG ET AL. v. WASHINGTON WATER POWER COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 142. Argued February 21, 1924. Decided May 26, 1924. 1. The Act of March 3, 1901, providing for granting rights of way for
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.