Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1926 Cases
356 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Deutsche Bank Filiale v. Humphrey
DEUTSCHE BANK FILIALE NURNBERG v. HUMPHREY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 224. Submitted October 12, 1926. Decided November 23, 1926. 1. An obligation in terms of the currency of a country takes the r
Hanover Fire Insurance v. Harding
HANOVER FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY v. HARDING, COUNTY TREASURER. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP ILLINOIS. No. 179. Argued October 18, 1926. Decided November 23, 1926. 1. While a State may forbid a foreign corporation to do business
United States v. General Electric Co.
UNITED STATES v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY et al. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. No. 113. Argued October 13, 1926. Decided November 23, 1926. 1. Through a system of contracts between a company
Hughes Bros. Timber Co. v. Minnesota
HUGHES BROTHERS TIMBER COMPANY v. MINNESOTA. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME .COURT OP MINNESOTA. No. 170. Argued October 6, 7, 1926. Decided November 23, 1926. 1. A State can not tax personal property which, is in actual transit in interstate co
Van Oster v. Kansas
VAN OSTER v. KANSAS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 303. Argued October 20, 1926. Decided November 22, 1926. 1. The power of a State to forfeit property used in violation of its liquor prohibition laws extends to pro
United States v. New York Central Railroad
UNITED STATES et al. v. NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 284. Argued October 29, 1926. Decided November 22, 1926. 1. The jurisdiction of the Interstat
Hudson v. United States
HUDSON et al. v. UNITED STATES. certiorari to the circuit court of appeals for the' third circuit. No. 307. Argued October 21, 1926. Decided November 22, 1926. After accepting a plea of nolo contendere to an indictment charging an offense p
Brasfield v. United States
BRASFIELD et al. v. UNITED STATES. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 243. Argued October 13, 1926. Decided November 22, 1926. 1. An inquiry, put by the trial judge to a jury unable to agree, asking the ex
Southern Pacific Co. v. United States
SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 239. Argued October 6, 1926. Decided November 22, 1926. 1. Military impedimenta were shipped by the War Department by expedited service over a railroad which
I. T. S. Rubber Co. v. Essex Rubber Co.
I. T. S. RUBBER COMPANY v. ESSEX RUBBER COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF (APPEALS FOR THE • FIRST CIRCUIT. No. 36. Argued April 13, 1926. Decided November 22, 1926. 1. The Court may decline to consider points not presented in.com
Graves v. Minnesota
GRAVES v. MINNESOTA. ERROR. TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP MINNESOTA. No. 320. Argued October 21, 1926. Decided November 22, 1926. 1. The requirement of Minnesota Gen. Stats. 1923, §§ 5757-5763, that every applicant for a license to p
McCardle v. Indianapolis Water Co.
McCARDLE et al. v. INDIANAPOLIS WATER COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR INDIANA. No. 37. Argued April 16, 19, 1926. Decided November 22, 1926. 1. In determining the present value of the property of a public, utility
Michigan v. Wisconsin
MICHIGAN v. WISCONSIN. IN EQUITY. No. 9, Original. Decree entered November 22, 1926. Decree fixing boundary between Michigan and Wisconsin and dividing costs equally between (he parties. [See opinion, 270 U. S. 295.]
Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.
VILLAGE OF EUCLID et al. v. AMBLER REALTY COMPANY. APPEAL PROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. No. 31. Argued January 27, 1926; reargued October 12, 1926. Decided November 22, 1926. 1. A suit to enjoin th
Anderson v. Shipowners Ass'n
ANDERSON v. SHIPOWNERS ASSOCIATION OF THE PACIFIC COAST et al. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 306. Argued October 28, 29, 1926. Decided November 22, 1926. 1. A suit by an individual, claiming injury, o
Yankton Sioux Tribe of Indians v. United States
YANKTON SIOUX TRIBE OF INDIANS v. UNITED STATES. CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 250. Argued October 7, 1926. Decided November 22, 1926. 1. Where promises are in the alternative,, the fact that one of them is at the time, or subseque
United States v. One Ford Coupe Automobile
UNITED STATES v. ONE FORD COUPE AUTOMOBILE. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 115. Argued December 9, 1925; reargued October 19, 20, 1926. Decided November 22, 1926. 1. Where property declared by a federa
Cusmano v. United States
No. 670. James Cusmano v. United States. November 1, 1926. No appearance for the United States.
Bliss v. Graves
No. 599. Aaron T. Bliss, Clerk of Midland County, et al. v. James C. Graves and Clifford G. Olmstead. November 1, 1926. Mr. Gilbert At Curry for petitioners. Mr. Frank A. Rock-with for respondents.
Ford Hydro-Electric Co. v. Neeley
No. 593. Ford Hydro-Electric Company v. Janet Neeley et al. November 1, 1926. Mr. William Ryan for petitioner. Mr.- William P. Beld'qn for respondents.
Winsett v. Spurway
No. 585. A. I. Winsett, Nathan Kendall, Charles E. Walker et al. v. H. J. Spurway, Receiver of The Tucson National Bank. November 1, 1926. Mr. Frank E.' Curley for petitioners. Mr. Francis M. Hartman for respondent.
Benham v. United States
No. 573. William G. Benham and Dwight Harrison v. United States. November 1, 1926. Messrs. Robert. R. Nevin and Smith W. Bennett for petitioners.. Solicitor General Mitchell, Assistant Attorney General Luhring, and' Mr. Harry S. Ridgely for
M. Samuel & Sons, Inc. v. Second National Bank of Toledo
No. 565. M. Samuel and Sons, Inc. v. Second National Bank of Toledo. November 1, 1926. Mr. Morris D. Kopple for petitioner. Mr. Robert C. Morris for respondent.
Riggs v. Workman
No. 559. L. J. Riggs v. Siegel Workman, United States Marshal. November 1, 1926. Mr. A. M. Belcher for petitioner. Solicitor General Mitchell, Assistant Attorney General Wille-brandt, and Mr. Mahlon D. Kiefer for respondent.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.