Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1926 Cases
356 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Ottinger v. Brooklyn Union Gas Co.
OTTINGER, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW YORK, v. BROOKLYN UNION GAS COMPANY. OTTINGER, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW YORK, v. KINGS COUNTY LIGHTING COMPANY. APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Nos. 358, 3
Ottinger v. Consolidated Gas Co.
OTTINGER, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW YORK, v. CONSOLIDATED GAS COMPANY OF NEW YORK. APPEAL FROM TI-TE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 357. Argued October 18, 19, 1926. Decided November 29, 1926. An Act o
Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. Doughton
WACHOVIA BANK & TRUST COMPANY, ADMINISTRATOR, et al. v. DOUGHTON, COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. 49. Argued May 6, 1926. Decided November 29, 1926. 1. A State may not subject to taxat
Mueller v. Adler
No. 4. Henry F. Mueller, Josephine Waldeck, Leona Muller by Josephine Waldech, Curatrix, et al. v. Samuel W. Adler, St. Louis Transit Co., et al. November 23, 1926. William J. . Hughes and Henry J. Richardson for'appellants. Mr. Henry S. Pr
Emlenton Refining Co. v. Chambers
No. 677. Emlenton Refining Company v. Walter A. Chambers, Trading as G. L. P. Chambers and Company, to the use of James A. Adams, etc. November 23, 1926. Messrs. J. E. Mullin and W. Pitt Gifford for petitioner. Mr. Henry J. Bigham for respo
Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Florida ex rel. Burr
No. 654. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company v. State of Florida ex rel. R. Hudson Burr, A. S. Wells, et al., etc. November 23, 1926. Messrs. James F. Wright, W. E. Kay, Thomas B. Adams,, and Frank W. Gwathmey for petitioner. Messrs. Fred
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Mappin
No. 645. Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company v. Gertrude Mappin, Administratrix of the Estate of Walter W. Mappin, Deceased. November 23, 1926. Messrs. Edgar W. Camp, Robert 0. Brennan, and E. E. Mclnnes for petitioner. Mr. Maxwel
Ashbaugh v. United States
No. 632. Paul M. Ashbaugh v. United States. November 23, 1926. Messrs. J. W. Barry and Paul M. Ashbaugh pro se, for petitioner. Solicitor General Mitchell, Assistant Attorney General Luhring and Mr. Harry S. Ridgely for the United States.
Kansas Flour Mills Co. v. Farmers National Bank of Burlington
No. 624. Kansas Flour Mills Company v. Farmers National Bank of Burlington, Kansas, et al. November 23, 1926. Mr. T. A. Noftzger for petitioner.' No appearance for respondents.
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. United States
No. 612. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company v. United States. November 23, 1926. Mr. Stanleigh P. Friedman for petitioner. Solicitor General Mitchell, Assistant Attorney General Willebrandt, and Mr. Mahlon D. Kiefer for the United
Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad v. United States
No. 589. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Company of Texas v. United States. November 23, 1926. Messrs. F. W. Clements and Lawrence H. Cake for petitioner. Solicitor General Mitchell, Assistant Attorney General Galloway, and Messrs. Gardiner
United States v. Ritterman
No. 669. United States v. Leib Ritterman. November 23, 1926. Solicitor General Mitchell, Messrs. J. Kennedy White, and Harry B. Amey for the United States. Mr. Albert MacC. Barnes, Jr., for respondent.
Ingram-Day Lumber Co. v. McLouth
No. 642. Ingram-Day Lumber Company v. Sidney C. McLouth, Revived against The American Loan and Trust Company, etc. November 23, 1926. Messrs. George L. Canfield, W. A. White, and Sidney T. Miller for petitioner. No appearance for respondent
United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp. v. California Wine Ass'n
No. 618. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation v. California Wine Association. November 23, 1926. Solicitor General Mitchell, Messrs. J. Frank Staley, Arthur M. Boal, Frederick R. Conway, and Ira S. Lillick for petitioner
Nagle v. Loi Hoa
No. 607. John D. Nagle, Commissioner of Immigration v. Loi Hoa. November 23, 1926. Solicitor General Mitchell and Assistant Attorney General Luhring for petitioner. No appearance for respondent.
Wisconsin v. Illinois
No. 7, original. State of Wisconsin v. State of Illinois and the Sanitary District of Chicago. Motions submitted .November 1, 1926. Decided November 23, 1926. Mr. James M. Beck in behalf of Messrs. William B. Applegate, Daniel N'. Kirby, an
Southern Surety Co. v. United States
No. 146. Southern Surety Company v. United States. Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of South Dakota. Motion to transfer submitted Novemoer 1, 1926. Decided November 23, 1926. Solicitor General Mitchell for t
Port Gardner Investment Co. v. United States
PORT GARDNER INVESTMENT COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 173. Argued December 9, 1925; reargued October 19, 20, 1926. Decided November 23, 1926. The prosecution with effect,
Federal Trade Commission v. Western Meat Co.
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. WESTERN MEAT COMPANY. THATCHER MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION. SWIFT & COMPANY v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. CERTIORARI TO THE C
United States v. Brims
UNITED STATES v. BRIMS et al. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTPI CIRCUIT. No. 212. Argued October 8, 1926. Decided November 23, 1926. 1. A conspiracy of manufacturers of mill-work, building contractors, and union ca
Salinger v. United States
SALINGER v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA. No. 238. Argued October 21, 1926. Decided November 23, 1926. 1. The statutes which define and distribute federal appellate jurisdiction a
Luckenbach Steamship Co. v. United States
LUCKENBACH STEAMSHIP COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 32. Argued March 11, 12, 1926. Decided November 23, 1926. 1. An appeal from a judgment of the Court of Claims (entered April 28, 1924,) applied for while a
Dodge v. United States
DODGE v. UNITED STATES. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT' No. 341. Argued October 27, 1926. Decided November 23, 1926. 1. Proceedings to forfeit a motor boat, under § 26 of Title II of the . National Prohibit
Massachusetts State Grange v. Benton
MASSACHUSETTS STATE GRANGE v BENTON, ATTORNEY GENERAL. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE . DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. No. 296. Argued October 13, 1926. Decided November 23, 1926. 1. Semble that there is no inconsistency b
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.